An Explicit Refutation of Michael Mann in the Peer Reviewed Literature

This is something you don't see every day: a peer-reviewed paper explicitly calling out by name the work of another scientist. But climate science is ground-breaking in many, and unexpected, ways.
Scientists Link 1950s-Present Climate Change In Europe To Sunshine Duration, ‘Natural Factors’
By Kenneth Richard on 16. June 2022

Share this...
There has been a “strong upward trend” in solar radiation over the European continent since the 1980s driven by natural ocean circulation factors responsible for “triggering and controlling the entire chain of events in climate processes.”
A new study references Dr. Michael Mann’s claim that “changes in SST and heat resources in the waters of the North Atlantic take place owing to anthropogenic factors.”

The authors have found conclusive evidence Mann’s so-called thesis is “inconsistent with both empirical data and modeling results” and, more directly, Mann’s claims are “not reflected in reality.”. . . .



Image Source: Marsz et al., 2022

 

Careful...He's highly litigious.

 

Suing over an article in a peer-reviewed journal would be self-defeating.