Anomalies in Vote Counts and Their Effects on Election 2020

Internet rumors are not proof of anything - sorry, dude.

 

Republicans have evidence which will come out in a court of law. Democrats have nothing.

 

Then use mail-in for strictly those(or count only strictly those age-groups.) Those who are healthy/unaffected should vote with the normal process. Also, it's cute that it's not "normal" to force everyone to go to a polling place, but it is normal to give ballots to every American to fill out by mail.

The fact is, the election shouldn't have been done this way. It should've been done as normal elections, how can we complain about election interference, and not have a normal election? This isn't me doubting the veracity, but the fact that others have. And we could've avoided this, since Trump/Biden agreed that it's madness.

 

Cool. Then my evidence will come out in court too. But thank you for admitting, once again, that you haven't actually seen any evidence and are just blindly believing what you've been commanded to believe.

 

See you in court.

 

it should have been Canadian style - paper ballots.

 

Let me save you some time. When you guys fail in court, your new excuse will be that the courts are part of the conspiracy. Bookmarked for later, though.

 

What lawsuits have Democrats filed?

 

Like your "evidence," that's a secret.

 

The courts will decide. And appeals will go to the SCOTUS.

 

Again nothing. Democrats have no lawsuits.

 

I'll make a deal with you @AFM , if Trump or any of his allies manage to prove, in a court of law, that massive voter fraud occurred and manages to flip the election, I will donate the maximum amount legally allowed to Trump's 2024 campaign (or to the RNC if Trump is not the candidate in 2024). You willing to make a similar wager?

 

Yes. Nothing. Which is exactly what you have. Are you starting to understand?

 

No it is not evidence.

It is based on a false premise which is the same false premise Gamblers fall prey to.

Dice do NOT have memory.

The voting patterns of the past are not valid predictors of current outcomes.

If they fail to predict and the current election breaks allpast trends it is NOT evidence of fraud

 

Loaded dice do have memories. They act similar to fraudulent ballots.

 

Which you've admitted you've seen no evidence of.

 

The courts have decided. Where have you been?

SCOTUS. Good luck getting this heard by SCOTUS. Not in a million years.

 

Dice and ballots do not act.

No one has displayed any fraudulent ballots.

And no, dice do not have memory nor do voting patterns

 

That will be there next excuse. "We would have won if SCOTUS had taken the case!" Every time they fail, they will update their excuses.

 

They're coming. You just wait. Right around the corner. I have lawyers working on it now.

 

There are lawsuits going forward as we speak. The entire election stinks. Other countries can see this and understand that the US has become a banana republic.

The SCOTUS should force a new election in the states in question.

 

The cases will be made in court.

 

Why, so you guys can make up **** about that one, too?

This is just another reminder that you have no evidence, you've admitted to seeing no evidence, and you still haven't said whether or not you'll take me up on my wager.

 

If you actually think they will win, you can take me up on my wager. But thank you for admitting, once again, that you've seen no evidence yourself.

 

Any Democrat law suits will only expose their own corruption.

 

That should be Trump's 2024 campaign slogan: "The check is in the mail!" Works on several levels.