AOC's Chief of Staff says the Green New Deal is not about the Climate

Yes I do. Accredited universities can’t teach BS and expect credits to be transferred from one school to another. Plus, large related corporations get really pissed when a student in engineering applies for a job with a degree from A university and claims to be a denier of AGW.

 

That is news to me. I had never at any point heard it said that scientists vote for Obama or for Hillary or even for Biden.

Liberals are not ever Democrats. At least not a true liberal. A Democrat is an authoritarian. As you are. See you are trying to bully this forum into your belief.

My science courses including in College never made me believe science is bogus. We were actually trained to think a lot. To learn to reason. To learn to connect dots.

We were not trained in politics. Clearly you believe your power is in politics. Mine is more in science frankly.

With politics one has to study much more than simple issues. One must learn a lot about psychology to learn why one man votes for an Obama vs a man who voted for Romney. Why would both be positive each is correct?

How can an entire nation follow say a Maduro of Venezuela and why would America's Democrats fawn over Maduro?

 

I’m not impressed by your little questions just thrown out there to promote doubt. All you have to do is google a serious institution if you really wanted to get answers. But you aren’t. You still confuse climate with weather.....39 years waisted.

 

I never said they voted for Obama. I said they were liberal.

 

You just did it again. AGW

AGW posits man is in control of climate and will show he is the master by making laws.

When you speak of global warming, it is not science at all. it is really politics.

Denier is a political term. But not scientific.

 

Why use a term like Liberal when you do not yet understand the meaning?

 

Actually climate is weather. What do you think Climate is? My thing that did not impress you is a serious study of clouds. A true scientist cares about clouds.

 

Speaking of politics, this really has to piss off conservatives.
https://www.huffpost.com/entry/only-six-percent-of-scien_n_229382

 

I didn’t use a term like Liberal, I said liberal. If you can’t tell the difference, you need to google it. It appears by your confusion of liberal with a lower case L, it’s you who don’t know the difference.

 

We’ve had racial equality for decades now. There are no laws or policy that stops anyone from doing anything they want, unless you want to talk about AA. So if you want to talk about racial equality start by eliminating policy that allows businesses and universities to fill quotas according to race and gender
Instead of the most qualified. That **** has to go.

Equality of outcome is untenable and flat out evil since we don’t have equal demographics which according to math and logic makes it impossible to have equal outcomes in ANYTHING. I’ll agree to handing CEO positions over to more minorities or women as soon as an equal number of white guys are playing in the NFL and NBA. AND women have to compete directly against men in all sports too. Let’s get equal

If expanding public housing means tax payers on the dole for certain people to get free room and board, often due to terrible decision making in their lives, then NO, we don’t need more of that crap. We need to teach people that others aren’t responsible for your screw ups.

 

Tell us what AGW means .

 

If you’re white, you’ve had racial equality for decades.

 

Climate is not weather.
You’re not a real scientist are you ?
slideplayer.com
“Climate vs. Weather. Weather is the day-to-day state of the atmosphere in a region and its short-term (minutes to weeks) variations, whereas climate is defined as statistical weather information that describes the variation of weather at a given place for a specified interval “

 

Are Democrats the Party of Science? Not Really.
Until liberals truly embrace the spirit of scientific inquiry, they'll never gain the upper hand in the policy debates of the Trump era.
By ERIC ARMSTRONG
January 10, 2017

https://newrepublic.com/article/139700/democrats-party-science-not-really

 

I’m doing my part. I’m pointing out how dumb it is to discredit the science from the world’s institutions dedicated to science.

 

Vague and undefined.

 

You did it again. Fell into my trap. Climate you just said is weather.

 

I see you believe you have had a superior life due to being white. Actually this thing called racial equality has to be a myth. Democrats do not believe it is on us yet.

 

Come on. Tell us what a denier is. I for example have long cited grand examples of climate changing. But truthfully not caused by man.

 

No, i am not a scientist. As a kid in college that was my plan at the time. But it did not turn out that way.

 

What is stopping black people or women from achieving ANYTHING they want? There is policy making it easier for them actually. Special scholarships, documented AA in college admissions and hiring. No ALL white colleges out there. No white ONLY scholarships or student groups. No white male ONLY loans. But there are female business loans. Black loans. Female ONLY or black only conferences. No white only leadership conferences besides whatever the KKK might put on in a grungy basement somewhere=) NO safe spaces for white people, hehe. But women and black people have them for some odd reason...while complaining about segregation, they SUPPORT IT. Boggles the mind when you break it down. No one celebrates an ALL WHITE owned business, yet people will cheer if someone says they started a black owned business. Where I work, we literally reserve contracts for black ONLY businesses. Cities do this as well, all in the name of "equality".

There has been equality of opportunity for quite a long time. Only recently have Democrats really gone over the deep end and embraced Communist/Socialist Equal Outcome beliefs. VERY scary. When a loon claims there should be an equal numbers of black CEOs, you have to wonder if they even understand basic math.

 

Steve McIntyre, the qualified expert who called out Hansen at NASA for cooking the data, gives us this definition of Climate Science
https://climateaudit.org/2015/09/28/shuklas-gold/

 

Then at least, it’s worthwhile looking things up on real science institutions sites before commenting on them.

 

Steve is a retired mining consultant. Wtf is his expertise in dissing NASA. NASA is an institution daily responsible for disseminating information that the entire world depends upon. . It has the backing of thousands of evidential related reaserch. Steve “wonder” is a coal schill. This is why AGW is overwhelming. You have individual schills, AGW has institutional backing. So now, you and Steve are smarter then NASA. Wow.
Steve writes a blog. Anyone can write a blog.

 

We still want to know if any deniers really understand AGW.