Are Zionist extremists about to give America their most aggressive Zionist....EVER?

Discussion in 'Latest US & World News' started by Jack Napier, Jul 5, 2012.

  1. Jack Napier

    Jack Napier Banned

    Joined:
    Mar 22, 2011
    Messages:
    40,439
    Likes Received:
    207
    Trophy Points:
    0
    One need only spend an hour, more helps, but one hour is enough to see that the mantra 'America's interests are Israeli interests', could not be more ironically accurate. Depends HOW you define the use of the word 'America' though. I would have taken it to mean, and should mean, the general and true interests of all Americans. But that would be a total lie. Israeli 'interests' are definitely NOT in the best interests of American PEOPLE, not by a LONG way.

    So, what is meant by American then?

    Well, you see, Zionism loves to do many things, and one of the things it loves to do is hijack things, and redefine things.

    Therefore, in this context, I would suggest to you that the mantra oft repeated to you in the media is a LIE, and the reality is that what they really mean when they say that Israeli & US interests cannot have daylight between them, is that Zionist Jews, with 'dual nationality', who are in high office, in the US, there cannot be any daylight between THEM and Zionist Jewish interests, in Israel.

    Makes much more sense that way, and explains why, when Americans could use the money in America, why Obama or WHOEVER, will soon write the biggest ever welfare cheque, from the US, to their masters, in Israel.

    Anyone that cares study the political landscape will soon see that the Zionist mafia, they are becoming more lunatic in their actions, and I believe they are about to throw enough money at a man who possibly who will turn out to be the worse news ever, for Americans and everyone.....except for Israel, this man who sounds like an ammoral crook, will be fettered by, and beholden to.....Israel and Jewish supremacists.

    I speak, of course, about 'Mitt' Romney.

    Read for discussion...


    Republican US presidential candidate Mitt Romney is planning a trip to Israel this summer, the New York Times has reported.

    “He’s a strong friend of Israel and we’ll be happy to meet with him,” Ron Dermer, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s senior adviser, told the newspaper. Dermer worked with Republicans in the United States before immigrating to Israel, according to the paper.

    “We value strong bipartisan support for Israel and we’re sure it will only deepen that,” he added.

    A trip to Israel would be designed in part to help Romney build support among Jewish voters, evangelical voters and conservatives.

    During the Republican presidential primary, Romney accused President Barack Obama of throwing Israel, in his words, “under the bus.”

    This will be Romney’s fourth visit to Israel. His first visit was on a Mormon Church trip, and his second visit was in 2007, when he served as a keynote speaker at the Herzliya Conference. In January 2011, Romney spent three days in Israel during a tour of the region.

    Earlier, Romney said his policy toward the Jewish state would be the opposite of Obama’s. Speaking before the “Faith and Freedom Coalition,” he said that Obama is “more concerned about Israel attacking Iran than he is about Iran obtaining a nuclear weapon.

    “He’s almost sounded like he’s more frightened that Israel might take military action than he’s concerned that Iran might become nuclear,” Romney said.

    “It is unacceptable for Iran to become a nuclear nation and that we’re prepared to take any and all action necessary to keep that from happening.”

    Asked about the president’s attitude towards Israel, the Republican presidential hopeful said: “Well, I think by in large you could just look at the things the president’s done and do the opposite. You consider his first address to the United Nations he castigated Israel for building settlements.”

    Romney described the 1967 borders as “indefensible” and noted that Obama has been “disrespectful of Prime Minister Netanyahu.”

    He stressed that if elected, his administration would “forge a strong working relationship with the leadership in Israel.”

    “I would not want to show a dime’s worth of distance between ourselves and our allies like Israel. If we have disagreements, we can talk about them, you know, behind closed doors. But to the world, you show that we’re locked arm in arm.
    http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-4250404,00.html


    I almost want to puke.

    Then laugh...

    Then sigh..
     
  2. Ivan88

    Ivan88 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 6, 2012
    Messages:
    4,908
    Likes Received:
    42
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Partisan means enemy, so he values 2 enemy support for the Israelis.

    In the dialectics of war and propaganda, you always need 2 enemies so that you can manipulate them to do what you want.

    BTW, the Israelis are neither Israel nor Zionists.

    According to the Apostle Paul, Israel and Judah are under the New Covenant with Christ, (Romans 2:2829) and Zion is "...the city of the living God, the heavenly Jerusalem, and to an innumerable company of angels,

    To the general assembly and church of the firstborn, which are written in heaven, and to God the Judge of all, and to the spirits of just men made perfect,

    And to Jesus the mediator of the new covenant, and to the blood of sprinkling, that speaketh better things than that of Abel.

    See that ye refuse not him that speaketh. For if they escaped not who refused him that spake on earth, much more shall not we escape, if we turn away from him that speaketh from heaven." (Hebrews 12:22-25)

    So how could a bunch of anti-Christs be Israel or Zion or even Judah?
     
  3. Mandrake

    Mandrake New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 21, 2009
    Messages:
    3,063
    Likes Received:
    50
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Because it's what God wants. He wants nations to be pissed off enough at the Jews so that they will attack Israel in a war and then he gets to destroy all the attackers and say "Booyah! Who's da God? Who's da God?"
     
  4. Jack Napier

    Jack Napier Banned

    Joined:
    Mar 22, 2011
    Messages:
    40,439
    Likes Received:
    207
    Trophy Points:
    0

    I don't really think this is the time for semantics, Ivan, thanks and everything, but it is better that we stick with what Zionists call themselves, that being Zionists, and it is probably best that we use Israel or the Jewish state, or the Zionist state, othewise, this is going to get hellish complex.

    When I personally speak of Zionism, I speak of material and political Zionism, as founded by Therodore Hertzl, only about 100yrs ago.

    It was he who turned Jews from being of the religion of Judaism, into a national identity, and a collective people.

    It was initially only a very peripheral thing, in Judaism, follow the time lines, you will see that there was a great rift among Jews, those that did not want Judaism to be redefined along the idea of a national identity, and a 'genetically related people', but as a religion, as it had been, for 3000 yrs.

    And they were right to resist it at first, and many Jews still do, many of them spiritual Jews, who believe that the material construct of Israel, is forbidden, by god, in their Torah, and that Israel exists in a spiritual sense, it was never intended to exist in a material sense. Even then, it can only exist in any sense, upon the arrival, and NOT before, of their messiah, whosoever they believe that to be.

    Now, Zionists may tell you, that these would be 'wrong Jews', a 'minority of Jews', and not 'real Jews'.

    Well, actually, they are wrong, these Jews may be a minority (or maybe not, probably)...but not so long ago, their view was the mainstream one, Jews defined themselves by the spiritual side alone, and never by this CREATED (and forbidden), abomination.

    But you see, no matter who you cite, no matter even if you cite actual men that lived through A'witz, all Zionists do will be to attack that survivor.

    Truly - what does that tell you?
     
  5. Jack Napier

    Jack Napier Banned

    Joined:
    Mar 22, 2011
    Messages:
    40,439
    Likes Received:
    207
    Trophy Points:
    0
    In that narrative, all the Jews die.

    Except for a tiny number.

    Who must straight away, denounce their Jewishness.

    That is fact.
     
  6. Ivan88

    Ivan88 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 6, 2012
    Messages:
    4,908
    Likes Received:
    42
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Yeah, that's the popular idea. But it is false, because all Biblical prophecy was fulfilled with Christ's coming and the destruction of Jerusalem in 70 A.D. Maybe Christians should have started their calendar with this date.

    Armageddon is what the 3 evil spirits of Revelation 16 want humanity to suffer and die in. Haven't we had enough Armageddons already?
     
  7. Ivan88

    Ivan88 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 6, 2012
    Messages:
    4,908
    Likes Received:
    42
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Knowing how it was Christians who helped & inspired Hertzl and other self styled so called Jews to strive for rebuilding the old Pharisee capital of bloody oppression, tells me that Christians are to blame.

    Napoleon made a deal with the main branch of Judaism in Europe that they would be free as long as they were loyal to their various countries.

    But when the Ashkenazi Pharisees got fired up over rebuilding the old Talmudic power base of Jerusalem, they tried to get that main branch of Judaism to support their scheme for world power. When most European so called Jews refused, the Ashkenazi branch condemned them to death.

    When the Ashkenazi branch formed the Nazi government, they then had the opportunity to carry our their death sentence, and at the same time blame Germans, destroy Germany, and create the psychodrama of the Holocaust to launch their old Jerusalem revived power base plan.

    I have to give them credit for such a masterful plan that has been carried out so successfully. Considering how foolish Christendom has been, we deserve to be under the control of those who hate us. [​IMG]
     
  8. Jack Napier

    Jack Napier Banned

    Joined:
    Mar 22, 2011
    Messages:
    40,439
    Likes Received:
    207
    Trophy Points:
    0

    No question of the following;


    1) The Zionist movement, they wanted a backlash against the wider Jewish community.

    2) They wanted to fan the flames, and then exploit the anger that they had created.

    3) They definitely were aware of what was happening, across Europe, long before it reached a climax.

    4) They definitely made every effort to block European Jews escaping to Britain and the US.

    5) They 100% were prepared to do deals with the NA, be that financial or otherwise.

    6) In doing 1-5, they achieved what they most desired - a Jewish national state, built along the same German National Socialist lines, of a racial supremacy, etc.

    I cannot imagine there to be much of a difference between the Zionist of then, and those that we see today.

    Same core principles, or lack of.

    It is 2012 - and I am well aware of what pass as 'values' ...to a Zionist/Jewish supremacist.

    Lying about others.

    Sense of entitlement.

    Sense of underserving choseness or of being special.

    If something can be exploited, then do it.

    Attack those that shine a light..on pure evil.

    Etc, etc...

    I do not believe in 'satan', as an entity, with horns and a tail!

    However, if you listed what what thought to be the 'values' of 'satan', then compared them to a list of a Zionist/Jewish supremacist, you would perhaps notice a v striking thing.....

    Jack
     
  9. Ivan88

    Ivan88 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 6, 2012
    Messages:
    4,908
    Likes Received:
    42
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Glad to see you've over come that.

    When we use the word "Satan" it is in reference to unredeemed human opposition to "nature's God".
    Satan as an entity is basically the social self or ego we all inherit.
     
  10. Jack Napier

    Jack Napier Banned

    Joined:
    Mar 22, 2011
    Messages:
    40,439
    Likes Received:
    207
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I've never come over to that(sic), the idea of 'Satan' being some entity, that can manifest, in animal or human form, is obviously a fairytale.

    It's actually worse.

    'Satan' could be used as a by word for these behaviours;


    Knowing that you are lying, and being proud of it.

    Knowing the difference between right and wrong, but not applying it to yourself.

    Making that which is material or money based into a God.

    Lacking compassion, and rewading those that demonstrate a lack of it.

    Lacking empathy, and rewarding those that can demonstrate a lack of it.

    Able to treat the suffering of others, and their death, as if it were nothing.

    And so on..

    Lots of people can exhibit some of those traits, and always have, however, it is the Zionist that has postively made them central to what they are, and how they are.

    It DEFINES them.

    Jack
     
  11. Mr_Truth

    Mr_Truth Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2012
    Messages:
    33,372
    Likes Received:
    36,882
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    4423243154_f3578be0bd.jpg



    Netenyahu is Obama's puppet master
     
  12. Jack Napier

    Jack Napier Banned

    Joined:
    Mar 22, 2011
    Messages:
    40,439
    Likes Received:
    207
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Or ANY Israeli leader.

    To any Presidential candidate.
     
    Mr_Truth and (deleted member) like this.
  13. AestheticBrah

    AestheticBrah New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2012
    Messages:
    330
    Likes Received:
    17
    Trophy Points:
    0
  14. Jack Napier

    Jack Napier Banned

    Joined:
    Mar 22, 2011
    Messages:
    40,439
    Likes Received:
    207
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Back to Romney.

    It must surely strike someone, that in a nation of some three hundred MILLION people, in a nation that has produced some great creators, thinkers, writers, etc, that Mitt Romney is really the best that the political system can offer.

    I don't believe for one second, that there are not literally millions of men more noble, honest, creative, and a fine example to the world, than ...Mitt Romney.

    Which leads to the conclusion that it is the system itself, rather than the men it produces, which really needs voted out(sic), or cleaned up.

    As mentioned here....http://www.politicalforum.com/polit...ely-clean-up-corruption-politics-finance.html
     
  15. Mandrake

    Mandrake New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 21, 2009
    Messages:
    3,063
    Likes Received:
    50
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Game on.
     
  16. Jack Napier

    Jack Napier Banned

    Joined:
    Mar 22, 2011
    Messages:
    40,439
    Likes Received:
    207
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Americans are becoming smart to the fact, albeit slowly, that the game is up - and they have all been taken for a ride.

    However..it IS going to get worse for them, before it gets better, it would seem.

    It appears that it is going to have to get much worse, before they start to look at just WHO these people are, who keep writing welfare cheques for a foreign state, the same foreign state that can pretty much put it's shills DIRECTLY into the very heart of US politics, by way of the 'dual nationality'.

    It's NOT dual loyalty though, of that I assure you.

    This is also how evil Zionist criminals were able to be present, during the horrific and anti christian actions, in the notorious prison in Iraq.

    You can blame the grunts, that were too ignorant or dumb to know better.

    But on whose authority were they acting, who prompted them?

    Go look up that good and old fashioned American name...John Israel!

    I kid you not.

    Throw that name into the mix, with the prison, and the torture, and see what happens.

    John 'Israel'.

    Dear oh dear.

    I make some citations etc here.....http://www.politicalforum.com/polit...ontaminated-america-tutored-them-torture.html
     
  17. Mandrake

    Mandrake New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 21, 2009
    Messages:
    3,063
    Likes Received:
    50
    Trophy Points:
    0
    The first instances of officially sanctioned torture that I know came about during the Fillipino revolt against our rule there in the late 1890s. We waterboarded muslims there during that time.

    Also, see this:

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Philippine_Revolution

    American atrocities during the war and subsequent occupation included an episode on the island of Palawan in 1911, the commanding colonel noticed that Muslims go to great lengths to give a wide berth to avoid dogs – even small ones. This odd phenomenon, though he had seen frequently, never struck the colonel to investigate before. This time though, he made inquiries, and was informed that Muslims are not allowed to touch dogs. (The Hadith, details the reasons for this. Prophet Muhammad did not realize where the horrible stinking smell was coming from, until three days later, he saw his dead puppy dog decomposing under his bedstead. The Prophet decreed dogs were "Najis"(unclean), and from then on, Muslims are not allowed to touch dogs, especially its saliva around the mouth). The colonel then immediately ordered for as many dogs as he could get. As soon as 37 dogs were delivered, he sent his men armed with dogs into the local Muslims’ houses (bedrooms, kitchen, and all) in a ‘house to house’ search supposedly for Muslim resistance fighters. This type of ‘house to house’ searches terrified the local Muslims. The Muslim leaders immediately cooperated with the Americans by voluntarily and freely catching the resistance fighters (dead or alive) and handing them over to the Americans.

    Soon after, an American General, John L. Hansen Jr. who was in charge of the larger southern Philippine Island of Mindanao was amused to know of the Palawan episode and had seven captured Muslim prisoners dig their own graves. The eighth prisoner was handcuffed and made to watch the American execution process. The seven prisoners were then tied to seven posts, but without blindfolds, so that they too could see the proceedings of their own execution. In Muslim belief if a pig contaminated their bodies, they would go direct to the fires of hell permanently. The soldiers then slaughtered a live pig in front of them. The prisoners’ clothes and body were smeared with the pig's blood and fat. The pig was cut into seven portions and placed in each grave. At sundown, the prisoners were shot and their bodies were placed in each grave, together with the chunk of pork. The eighth prisoner was ordered to fill up the seven graves and subsequently set free. [78]

    In November 1901, the Manila correspondent of the Philadelphia Ledger reported:
    “ The present war is no bloodless, opera bouffe engagement; our men have been relentless, have killed to exterminate men, women, children, prisoners and captives, active insurgents and suspected people from lads of ten up, the idea prevailing that the Filipino as such was little better than a dog...

    Our soldiers have pumped salt water into men to make them talk, and have taken prisoners people who held up their hands and peacefully surrendered, and an hour later, without an atom of evidence to show that they were even insurrectos, stood them on a bridge and shot them down one by one, to drop into the water below and float down, as examples to those who found their bullet-loaded corpses.[79]
    ”

    In Manila, a U.S. Marine named Littletown Waller, a major, was accused of shooting eleven defenseless Filipinos, without trial, on the island of Samar. Other marine officers described his testimony:
    “ The major said that General Smith instructed him to kill and burn, and said that the more he killed and burned the better pleased he would be; that it was no time to take prisoners, and that he was to make Samar a howling wilderness. Major Waller asked General Smith to define the age limit for killing, and he replied “Everything over ten.”[80] ”

    In the province of Batangas, the secretary of the province estimated that of the population of 300,000, one third had been killed by combat, famine, or disease.

    American firepower was overwhelmingly superior to anything the Filipino rebels could put together. In the very first battle, Admiral Dewey steamed up the Pasig River and fired 500-pound shells into the Filipino trenches. Dead Filipinos were piled so high that the Americans used their bodies for breastworks.

    A British witness said:
    “ This is not war; it is simply massacre and murderous butchery.[8
     
  18. Ivan88

    Ivan88 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 6, 2012
    Messages:
    4,908
    Likes Received:
    42
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Thanks Mandrake for posting the accounts of US democracy at work in the Philippines.
     
  19. Ivan88

    Ivan88 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 6, 2012
    Messages:
    4,908
    Likes Received:
    42
    Trophy Points:
    48
    What is "far right"? Is it on your right or mine?
     
  20. Hoosier8

    Hoosier8 Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2012
    Messages:
    107,541
    Likes Received:
    34,488
    Trophy Points:
    113
    That has got to be the funniest thing I have read in a long time!
     
  21. Hoosier8

    Hoosier8 Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2012
    Messages:
    107,541
    Likes Received:
    34,488
    Trophy Points:
    113
    During the same time it was reported in the States to wide acclaim. This was a time of expansionism and manifest destiny. This led the Japanese to believe they could be one of the big boys and followed suite to great disaster because they were not of the right race. they were not allowed in the club.

    The atrocities of the Philippines were not much different from the atrocities throughout western America just before that time.

    Note to Jack: No Jewish influence at this time.
     
  22. Jack Napier

    Jack Napier Banned

    Joined:
    Mar 22, 2011
    Messages:
    40,439
    Likes Received:
    207
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Back to Romeny, lets see who skulks in the shadows..

    How about....Orit Gadiesh.

    Who? Her....

    is an Israeli-American corporate strategist and chairwoman of management consulting firm Bain & Company.

    (Okay)

    Gadiesh was born in Haifa, Israel in 1951, the daughter of a Berlin-born Israel Defense Forces colonel and his Ukrainian-born wife. After completing her compulsory service in the IDF, serving in military intelligence, Gadiesh studied at Hebrew University, graduating in 1975 with a bachelor's degree in psychology. Gadiesh graduated from Harvard Business School in 1977 in the top 5 percent of her class and was awarded the Brown prize for the most outstanding marketing student.

    (Right you are)..

    Forbes has listed her among the world's 100 most powerful women four times since 2004.

    (Have they - lovely).

    Now.

    This should weed out those with no attention span, as it is 15 mins long.

    It would be truly staggering indeed, if someone were to watch it all the way through and STILL not see.

    [video=youtube;vCBQxaJcQBg]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vCBQxaJcQBg[/video]
     
  23. Mandrake

    Mandrake New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 21, 2009
    Messages:
    3,063
    Likes Received:
    50
    Trophy Points:
    0
    The vid looks boring. I decided to watch some porn instead. That broad probably looks nasty nekkid.
     
  24. Jack Napier

    Jack Napier Banned

    Joined:
    Mar 22, 2011
    Messages:
    40,439
    Likes Received:
    207
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Even in your humour, you serve to illustrate a good point.

    Well done.
     
  25. Jack Napier

    Jack Napier Banned

    Joined:
    Mar 22, 2011
    Messages:
    40,439
    Likes Received:
    207
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Excellent point, when did it start, what was the genisis, of Jewish extremists subversion of the US.

    Others may give you another time line, however, I believe it was the 60's, that is when I really think that it began.

    Prior to that, Americans were not bothered about Jews, in fact, if they thought about Jews at all, they did not always have a favourable view of them, for some reason, I have no idea, probably mindless Nazis.

    Truth be told, it was reported in the American media, at the time, what was happening to Jews in Europe, and Americans paid it about as much attention then, as they do reports of Palestinian deaths, today. None.

    Despite delayed tears, delayed by some 15 yrs or so, oh how they made sure you more than made up for that, since then.

    How you are made to think that all Gentile life is, ultimately up for sale or slaughter, while the life of a Jewish Zionist is more precious, how their suffering is always greater, no matter where or when or what, Goy of the world, I think your brains are that of cattle...

    Listen to it....from the horses mouth....

    [video=youtube;qUNp_Zsk7us]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qUNp_Zsk7us[/video]

    Now, my question is, do YOU think Jewish supremacy is something you wish to meekly accept?

    I think not.

    There is no reason why we NEED to go on accepting.
     

Share This Page