As the Lauren Boebert "SugarDaddyMeet.com-Gate" begins to expand...and it is going to expand a lot

I thought I would add my opinion.

First, there is a Liberal PAC called "American Muckrakers". They've been around for a while. However, they jumped to prominence as they brought things about soon to be Ex-Congressman and wonderful cross-dresser Madison Cawthorne to light.

There is also an associated group called "Fire Boebert" (probably an arm of the Muckis) and a number of days ago, they issued these allegations against Boebert:



That's a lot of stuff, so let's break that down some. Here no. 1:



So, they are claiming that she moonlighted as an unlicensed sex-worker. I personally have no problem with her having earned some bucks as a sex worker, but the Party she is part of has a major problem, you know, family values and all that stuff. I write that she moonlighted as such because I doubt you will find pay receipts from SugarDaddyMeet.com on her tax returns.

No. 2:



Actually, they are claiming that she had not just one, but rather, two abortions. Again, I have no problem with her having had an abortion (or 2). Heck, with all those clients who were deep inside of her, it was bound to happen that she might just get a wee bit pregnant. Only, she is against abortion, so the hypocrisy of this stinks to high heaven.

No. 3:



Aha, the plot thickens. Turning tricks for the Koch family and then, all of a sudden, in the "company" of a US Senator. Interesting!

No. 4:



Ok, that's an ethics issue, may also be an election crime. Also, she is not good at math.

So, Boebert's 1st response:



Ripping a page out of Trump's book, she just called it fake news. But the Muckrakers were not shaking in their boots.

So, Congressthing Boebert turned up the heat a little:



Interestingly enough, she did not do this from her official congressional Twitter account, but rather, from her private account. Hmmmm...

Then, an attorney representing her threatened Muckrakers:



Interesting!

More:



"When you are terrified, threaten!"

Unfortunately for Congressthing Boebert, the Muckrakers are still not shaking in their boots, nosiree:



First, I would say this this tweet was very unartful, but it tells me how solid the Muckis think their allegations are. In other words, they are not scared.

The key sentence is: "We would love to depose you about these matters...."

Because if she files a defamation lawsuit, then this means discovery and discovery process means depositions that she cannot skip out on.

Either way, she is now damaged goods. Cruz will drop her like a hot potato and will have to explain to Heidi where $75,000 of their money went...

I must assume that this is just the tip of the iceberg, that the Muckis have just a ton of evidence (written, video, audio, checks, receipts, internet urls, and so forth) to back up what they are alleging -- and then some to boot. Because where there is smoke, there is fire.

Also, this is coming out 5 1/2 months before the Congressional Midterm Elections of 2022, so the drip-drip-drip of this is not going to go away.

This same PAC has also alleged that she was in a major car wreck and fled the scene, leaving an injured relative and at least one of her kids in the car, two weeks before the 2020 congressional primaries in Colorado.

Lauren Boebert is a lying hypocrite. She is bad for America and especially bad for the Republican Party. I look forward to her deposition!!!

-Stat

 

this is the best op explaining this situation yet. thanks.

add boebert's work on jan 6 tweeting ms pelosi's location to the mob and she may be in enough trouble.

there is some speculation that cawthorne had become enough of an embarrassment to repub leadership that they sent the evidence to muckraker. do you think boebert might have irritated her senior repubs enough for them to torpedo her?

 

maybe this important thread needs a kick

 

With MAGA so many things are possible!

 

One correction, the "American Mudrakers" is not a liberal PAC, but a conservative one.

 

I believe you are right on that and I apologize for the slight error.

 

So...no evidence, but because they claimed they have evidence, that's proof?

OK.

 

So you believe men will testify that they paid her for sex? I wonder what made her change to a less honorable profession?

 

expand or.... spread

 

They're not worried about getting sued so they must have something.

 

so soon we see then, let's see if Boebert sues

 

they will slowly release more evidence as Boebert puts herself into a corner

 

Clearly we have different standards of evidence but OK

 

two abortions from a Republican Congresswoman would be something, would she still get the rights vote?

 

As long as she says she found God after her multiple abortions, they will vote for her.

 

Boy McCarthy and Moscow Mitch, sipping off the Russian dark money, must really want her gone to burn her like this.

 

if they would vote for Trump, they have no moral backbone to brag about

 

Says the person who claims to have been a trump supporter...

 

yep, and when the truth about Trump came out, I stopped supporting him.... see how that works.... I have a moral backbone

 

Endless financing from political allies is what they have. They dont care if they lose because the clicks, donations and favors will outweigh the settlement regardless. 'Lawfare' and propaganda is big business these days.

 

I doubt it but ok.

 

So you jump out of The frying Pan directly into the fire. Lol.

Way to really display that ''backbone''

 

do you still support Trump? Way to really display that ''backbone'' if you do?

 

Of course she will, as long as her opponent is a Democrat. I don't live in her district, but I'm not far from it. After all, they voted for a man who cheated on all three of his wives, one after another.

 

That's an interesting notion. Is there proof of their involvement with the Muckrakers?