Asexuals are fighting for representation too

Discussion in 'Gay & Lesbian Rights' started by kazenatsu, May 21, 2018.

  1. The Amazing Sam's Ego

    The Amazing Sam's Ego Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2013
    Messages:
    8,206
    Likes Received:
    44
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Christian cultures leave the breasts covered.

    Im not saying breasts are reproductive organs, but there's no need for people to see what a woman uses to feed her offspring.
     
  2. The Amazing Sam's Ego

    The Amazing Sam's Ego Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2013
    Messages:
    8,206
    Likes Received:
    44
    Trophy Points:
    48
    They are sexual because nobody needs to see what a woman uses to feed her offspring. There's no need.
     
  3. Maquiscat

    Maquiscat Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 25, 2017
    Messages:
    2,951
    Likes Received:
    658
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    There is not as much negative social stigma associated with female on female sexual interaction as with male on male.
     
    Ritter likes this.
  4. Maquiscat

    Maquiscat Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 25, 2017
    Messages:
    2,951
    Likes Received:
    658
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    That's an opinion. Many cultures do not agree with you. Mind you I am address the underlying issue. You present an implication that there is a problem is seeing breasts. Other cultures see no issue, so there is not a need to cover up.
     
  5. The Amazing Sam's Ego

    The Amazing Sam's Ego Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2013
    Messages:
    8,206
    Likes Received:
    44
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Whats an example? People say thats so gay but not thats so lesbian?
     
  6. The Amazing Sam's Ego

    The Amazing Sam's Ego Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2013
    Messages:
    8,206
    Likes Received:
    44
    Trophy Points:
    48
    For example, Michael Jackson is viewed as wierd for supposedly being a gay pedophile but Elvis Presley isnt viewed the same way for being a straight pedophile.

    I dont think either of them fit the clinical definition, from what I read in an article about Michael Jackson. In bibical times teenagers were considered adults. Thats besides the point because there is so much proof that he was innocent.
     
  7. kazenatsu

    kazenatsu Banned Donor

    Joined:
    May 15, 2017
    Messages:
    13,315
    Likes Received:
    3,864
    Trophy Points:
    113
    That's because all those girls (and half their mothers too) were throwing themselves at him.

    Anyway, back then in the South at that time Elvis was a star, it would have been seen as socially acceptable for a young man to get married to a 16-year-old, in some cases even a bit younger. (We've had other threads in the past about this subject)
     
    Last edited: Oct 8, 2019
    Ritter likes this.
  8. btthegreat

    btthegreat Advisor Staff Member

    Joined:
    May 30, 2010
    Messages:
    12,022
    Likes Received:
    3,565
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Yet another foolish ignorant post. You are on a roll today!
     
  9. Maquiscat

    Maquiscat Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 25, 2017
    Messages:
    2,951
    Likes Received:
    658
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Part of the issue is that.the term pedophiles is used in a lazy English manner to mean sexual attraction to anyone considered a minor, especially with a 10 year or more gap (guestimation. Some will believe it with a smaller gap). Pedophilia actually refers to attractions to children 13 and under. Hebophillia is the disorder for attraction in the 11 to 14 range, while ephebophilia is ranged 15 to 19. A minimum of a 5 year age gap is required for pedophilia at least. Not as sure on the others.
     
  10. Polydectes

    Polydectes Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 21, 2010
    Messages:
    30,219
    Likes Received:
    6,665
    Trophy Points:
    113
    You can call me all the names you want I'm still going to reject ridiculous nonsense like asexual people.

    I also reject the concept of non-binary. These stupid things are little snowflake statuses for people who aren't special but desperately want to be special
     
    Last edited: Oct 8, 2019
  11. btthegreat

    btthegreat Advisor Staff Member

    Joined:
    May 30, 2010
    Messages:
    12,022
    Likes Received:
    3,565
    Trophy Points:
    113
    yet another foolish and ignorant post, that refuses to recognize any difference between is said about a post, and what is said about a poster. You ought to be able to by now.

    Asexual people are as real as heterosexual, bisexual and homosexual people are and just as fluid about their orientation/ interests as the former or latter may be
     
    Last edited: Oct 8, 2019
  12. Polydectes

    Polydectes Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 21, 2010
    Messages:
    30,219
    Likes Received:
    6,665
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Good I'm glad you think that. anything you think is foolish and ignorant is probably well-thought-out and quite astute.

    I think I would take it as an insult If You complemented by post considering Who You Are.
     
  13. The Amazing Sam's Ego

    The Amazing Sam's Ego Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2013
    Messages:
    8,206
    Likes Received:
    44
    Trophy Points:
    48
    I don't believe Michael Jackson did any of the things that he was accused of.
    I think he was a victim of his own kindness and good nature. I think he also lacked judgment and common sense.

    I think if a person doesnt look like an adult and there's a 5 year age gap then the person has incurable psychiatric problems. I dont think all sex offenders are clinically mentally ill. I think registries shouldnt just only apply to extreme cases, because that would be taking away the consequences of sin.
     
  14. The Amazing Sam's Ego

    The Amazing Sam's Ego Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2013
    Messages:
    8,206
    Likes Received:
    44
    Trophy Points:
    48
    I still think that even non pedophilia cases should be put on registries because taking away the consequences of fornication would encourage it.
     
  15. kazenatsu

    kazenatsu Banned Donor

    Joined:
    May 15, 2017
    Messages:
    13,315
    Likes Received:
    3,864
    Trophy Points:
    113
    That view is stupid.

    Take a look at this thread: 19 year old put on sex offender registry for having sex with underage girl

    You want to talk about putting them on special underage registries, fine, but don't lump them together with the rest of those on the sex offender registry for what essentially was an act of consensual sex.

    People may not realize it, but that's the same type of mistake feminists have made expanding the definition of rape and sexual assault. They kept expanding the definition so widely that now it hardly means as much as it used to.
     
    Last edited: Oct 8, 2019
  16. Maquiscat

    Maquiscat Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 25, 2017
    Messages:
    2,951
    Likes Received:
    658
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    That is a religious principle that not all religions hold to. And even among the non religious it's a split ticket. And since no religious principle should be forced upon those not of that religion, then it's best not to have it codified in law
     
  17. Maquiscat

    Maquiscat Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 25, 2017
    Messages:
    2,951
    Likes Received:
    658
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    When you can get on the list for public urination, it's obvious the system is broken. There is nothing sexually dangerous in that.
     
  18. kazenatsu

    kazenatsu Banned Donor

    Joined:
    May 15, 2017
    Messages:
    13,315
    Likes Received:
    3,864
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I overall agree with what you're saying, but I'm going to have to point out that's a very weak argument. What if, for example, Islam says it's okay to do something? There's a lot of threads in this forum posted about that sort of thing.

    Anyway, I'm going to have to tell you to shut down this side discussion so we can return back to the main topic in this thread.
     
    Last edited: Oct 8, 2019
  19. The Amazing Sam's Ego

    The Amazing Sam's Ego Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2013
    Messages:
    8,206
    Likes Received:
    44
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Without an age of consent society would have disorder.
     
  20. The Amazing Sam's Ego

    The Amazing Sam's Ego Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2013
    Messages:
    8,206
    Likes Received:
    44
    Trophy Points:
    48
    My friend said about Michael Jackson, that even if the boys looked like men, he was still a gay pedophile because they were underage.

    Is that a strawman argeument? There's a difference between unacceptable in an orderly society and fitting the clinical definition of a mentally ill person ,t is incurable. There was more than a five year gap between them, but i remember a michael jackson fan said he didnt fit the clinical definition of pedophile because they werent younger than prepubescent

    my friend has a point because in an orderly society certain things are not acceptable
     
    Last edited: Oct 9, 2019

Share This Page