You're misstating 90% of what I have already posted. 1) The SAT, PSAT, ASVAB, etc., are quasi-IQ tests, and I presented plenty of proof of that with numerous quotes, numbers, and graphs showing the correlations between them and IQ. 2) Because the SAT, PSAT, and ASVAB are not exactly IQ tests, you can indeed study for them and improve your score. I never said otherwise, but you're now claiming that I did, or claiming that's what I implied. 3) Studying for IQ tests is possible, but the better quality IQ tests will not have any questions that you can/will have prepared for. "Make a sentence using the three words, hunter, hare, field," is the famous one from Judgement at Nuremberg. A simple-minded man can study all day long and still not be able to do it. I'm having trouble teaching my 5 year old niece how to count to five. I don't hold out much hope that she's going to become a nuclear physicist. 4) The SAT was revamped back in the 1990s to cover more academic subjects rather than fluid intelligence, making it less of an IQ test and more of a test of academic memorization. However, even memorization, crystallized intelligence, is part of IQ. High IQ individuals can learn and memorize more and faster than low IQ individuals. High IQ individuals are going to be in fast track and college track courses and thereby be exposed to higher-level concepts and problems than low IQ individuals, giving them an inherent advantage to doing well on the SAT. If anything, the fluid intelligence test was better because it picked up smart kids who did poorly in school or who had been put in the wrong track early in life or ended up at low grade schools and gave them a second shot at success. This was the concept behind Malcolm in the Middle, a smart kid whose talents hadn't been recognized before being tested because he'd been an adequate but not outstanding student, and how his life changed after being moved up to the group with the nerds & outcasts. I'm curious why the left has no problem believing that the races are not equal when it comes to athletic ability but have a real problem with believing that the races are not equal when it comes to intellectual ability. Why do blacks make up 80% of the NBA but only 2% of doctors? Why are leftists okay with the first number but not okay with the second one? Why does the first number represent merit but the second one represent bigotry? Well, here's some more bigotry to make you feel better: The average IQ in the Middle East is down around 80, below that of American blacks, mostly due to the Islamic practice of incestuous marriages between cousins to keep property in the family. And most Middle Easterners are considered Caucasian. Meanwhile, down in Nigeria, the Igbo tribe has an average IQ of 100-103, and they are as black as they can be. Many US schools have been recruiting Igbo children to get their minority numbers up. Meanwhile, not all Asians enjoy a naturally high IQ. Koreans (106), Japanese (105), and Chinese (103) do, but the average IQ in Vietnam is only 96, in Indonesia 89, and in the Philippines just 86. One of the tiny ethnic minorities in China (I forget which one now) essentially takes the place of blacks, with low IQ's, high crime, and high birthrate. It's an insult among Han Chinese to be called by the ethnic minority name. Ashkenazi Jews form an overclass anywhere they live because they have an average IQ of 115. Sub-Saharan Africans would be considered mentally retarded in the United States because they have an average IQ of 70. If you were going to take in millions of new immigrants, which would be more advantageous, taking in millions more Ashkenazi Jews or taking in millions more sub-Saharan Africans? I don't know if this is what Trump was talking about when he talked about taking in Norwegians (average IQ 98.) rather than Mexicans (average IQ 87) or Haitians (average IQ 72), but it certainly makes sense from an IQ standpoint. Which cousin would you rather come stay with you, the smart one who makes a six figure income or the stupid one who is unemployed and going to leech off of you for the next five years? East Asian immigrants make six figure incomes, as do their kids. Haitian immigrants leech off of welfare for years, as do their kids. This isn't hard to understand, but leftists have a hard time accepting it for some reason.