Assange: Donald Trump Will Not Be Allowed To Win US Elections

He laid out reasons for his conclusion quite clearly. I happened to agree with JA about mainstream media ignoring important emails in which was disclosed that Hillary's campaign, the Clinton Foundation and the Islamic State have been receiving funds from the same source. Basically, Hillary and ISIS are financed by the same people.

Julian Assange predicts Donald Trump will not be allowed to win US elections

http://www.ibtimes.co.uk/julian-ass...=rss&utm_content=/rss/yahoous/news&yptr=yahoo


Julian Assange has claimed that Donald Trump "would not be permitted to win" the US presidential elections due to a lack of support from any major "establishment". In the second excerpt of his exclusive interview with John Pilger, to be broadcast by Russian state media outlet RT, Assange also said that the Clinton Foundation and the Islamic State (Isis) received funding from the same source. Citing a 2014 email, recently published by WikiLeaks as part of the Podesta dump, Assange said: "All serious analysts know, and even the US government has agreed, that some Saudi figures have been supporting IS and funding IS, but the dodge has always been that it is some 'rogue' princes using their oil money


Just in case usual suspects try to divert attention and accuse Russkies of subversion.

WikiLeaks
✔
@wikileaks

ED: Assange interview was not with RT. The interview was for the UK. Dartmouth Films then sold to broadcasters outside the UK, including RT.

Assange said: "My analysis is that Trump would not be permitted to win. Why do I say that? Because he has had every establishment off his side. Trump does not have one establishment, maybe with the exception of the Evangelicals, if you can call them an establishment.

"Banks, intelligence, arms companies, foreign money, etc, are all united behind Hillary Clinton. And the media as well. Media owners, and the journalists themselves."

 

Unfortunately he is probably right. He'll win the election in terms of REAL voters, but reports of massive Democratic voter fraud and voting computers shifting votes from Republican to Democrat are coming in from all over the country from swing states - as many as 150,000 votes at a time. In addition, Democrat appointed federal judges are agreeing to ban poll watchers, which is those judges essentially authorizing unlimited numbers of fraudulent votes being cast in polling locations by Democrat polling place staff.

This does NOT mean Clinton will remain president. She is in the same situation only worse than Nixon in Watergate prior to his election - and he won 49 of 50 states. The insider elite powers-that-be did NOT want ANTI-WAR McGovern so they destroyed him - and THEN they took out Nixon after the election.

 

i don't think he is right about intelligence cia fbi nsa

 

I believe he was referring to people in charge of those organisations. The management. I'm certain there are field agents out there who are sick and tired of corruption, treason and wrongdoings within the U.S establishment. I'm afraid they're not powerful enough to turn the tide and send the ship in the right direction.

 

so this was all about putting Tim Kaine in mr CFR.. got it..
http://www.cfr.org/publication/image-resizer.php?id=37316&preset=bkg_tcp_640

 

The whole affair is simply disgraceful. I simply cannot understand why powers that be are so determined to force the most compromised and the worst character in U.S political history (Hillary Clinton) onto American people. For heaven's sake, Democrats could've chosen anyone else. Why electing a proven criminal? Whatever happens I'm certain that there's going to be some sort of a political crisis in the USA. Further divisions. Hang onto your arms.

 

soros cant lose i see even if hillary gets the boot
hes gets to be in with the top senators Senate Foreign Relations Committee

 

Well, I'd rather have the President the "establishment" wants.
Then the President the "Russian establishment" wants.

And deny it all you like. The KKK and white supremacist support Trump because they agree
with his views, when it comes to race relations.

People don't support you because the disagree with your views.

 

Is Assange also claiming that David Duke will not be allowed to win the LA Senate race?

 

I believe the anti establishment movement will continue to grow. A Clinton presidency will cauterize the movement.

 

establishment is the CFR/Senate Foreign Relations Committee is the military industry complex and will led to WANTS! ww#3

 

Seriously, do you really believe the insanity about Russian involvement? KKK? Really? Jesus, will you get out of the character assassination moonbat conspiracy talking points? It makes everyone in this country look dumber when the Russian thing is repeated.

 

The Saudis have given tens of millions of dollars to the Clinton Foundation, and it is the Saudis who have been funding AQ and the rebels in Syria - and Hillary supports them.

 

Big PR mistake having this on RT. Is Assange alive? I thought he hadn't been seen for a while?

 

Soros is playing a long game. A sneaky guy. He's been investing his own wealth into reshaping the U.S justice system according to his liking. It's actually quite surprising that he's allowed to interfere in U.S internal matters to such an extent.


George Soros is using his massive wealth to reshape the US justice system
http://www.businessinsider.com/george-soros-spending-millions-on-local-prosecutor-elections-2016-8

George Soros, the billionaire financier, is ponying up serious cash to reform the US criminal-justice system.

Soros has pumped over $3 million into seven local district-attorney campaigns in six states in the past year, reports Politico.

He is pushing the money into local elections in Florida, Illinois, Louisiana, Mississippi, New Mexico, and Texas through a network of state-level super PACs and a national "527" unlimited-money group, according to Politico...

 

Too late. We look stupid already just by the fact that people are actually considering voting Donald Trump for our President. Thanks right wingers for dumbing down our country once again.

 

RT bought his interview like any other broadcaster willing to pay for it. The interview was for the UK Dartmouth. John Pilger conducted the interview. Alive and kicking for the time being.

WikiLeaks
✔
@wikileaks

ED: Assange interview was not with RT. The interview was for the UK. Dartmouth Films then sold to broadcasters outside the UK, including RT.

 

so when one gets smarter is because they have been too one of the liberal collages and taught by a professor to be globalistic minded instead of a so called dumber one that has more common sense as a nationalist ok got it..

 

RUSSIANs!

 

Sounds like an inquiry for the tinfoil hat crowd.

 

To say nothing of the fact that a cowardly, rapist loon social media whore (like Assange) is even being taken seriously by anyone.

I wonder if Assange has cornered the market on Reynolds Wrap?

 

Some Americans are clearly deluded. Assange is an angel in comparison to Bill Clinton. They still don't understand that Assange's character assassination failed. Keep flogging the dead horse.

This is his view on U.S presidential candidates and the U.S election. You've got to choose between cholera and gonorrhea

What Julian Assange’s War on Hillary Clinton Says About WikiLeaks
https://theintercept.com/2016/08/06/accusing-wikileaks-bias-beside-point/

But it should come as no surprise to anyone who looks back at the founding principles of WikiLeaks that Assange — who has clearly stated his distaste for the idea of the former secretary of state becoming president — would make aggressive use of leaked documents to try to undermine her.

As Raffi Khatchadourian explained in a New Yorker profile of the WikiLeaks founder in 2010, “Assange, despite his claims to scientific journalism, emphasized to me that his mission is to expose injustice, not to provide an even-handed record of events.” To Assange, Khatchadourian wrote, “Leaks were an instrument of information warfare.”

In other words, Assange’s project has been from the start more like opposition research than dispassionate reporting. His goal is to find dirt in the servers of powerful individuals or organizations he sees as corrupt or dangerous, and bring them down by exposing it. As he memorably told Der Spiegel in 2010, “I enjoy crushing bastards.”

His recent focus on “crushing” Clinton but not Trump has led some to ask Assange if he is worried about helping to elect someone who might be even more hostile to him — let alone to the causes of justice and peace that have motivated Wikileaks’ previous disclosures. Asked recently by Amy Goodman of “Democracy Now” if he does prefer Trump over Clinton, Assange replied, “You’re asking me, do I prefer cholera or gonorrhea?”

Speaking to Bill Maher on Friday night from the Ecuadorian Embassy in London, where he has been effectively confined for more than four years, Assange joked about hacking Trump’s tax returns, but added, “from the perspective of WikiLeaks trying to protect its sources, you have really two very bad presidential candidates.”

In an address to the American Green Party convention on Saturday, Assange reiterated that both major party candidates for the presidency were “horrific,” but argued that “it certainly doesn’t make as much difference as people say,” which of them gets elected. What is important, he said, is to build political pressure “to discipline and hold to account and check the abuses of power during the next four years...

PS
And he was right. Snowden is deluded if he thinks Clinton is going to pardon him.

 

OP

I'm beginning to conclude there are dark forces at work here, and that Donald Trump ought to increase his personal security until election day.

 

Dark forces have been at work in the USA for quite some time. It's just easier to get the message out there in this digital age so people are better informed. In all honesty, after all those disclosures about Hillary and her inner circle, the only debate we should be having here whether to send her to prison for life or execute her for treason. Yet some morons would like her to be their next president. Beggars belief!

 

Donald Trump will never win. He doesn't need any help losing this race.

He has time an time again proven that he does not have what it takes to be a president.