http://photoblog.msnbc.msn.com/_new...show-up-in-moon-photos?chromedomain=cosmiclog lol. Of course this is just propaganda designed to support the ludicrous notion that men managed to land on then take off of the moon and return home. (sarc)
Those photos are fakable so they're not proof of anything. They also don't make the anomalies, which are proof they did some faking, go away. http://www.politicalforum.com/moon-landing/190138-apollo-moon-missions-were-faked-studio.html If they had really gone, there wouldn't be any anomalies.
What "anomaly"? You can see the (*)(*)(*)(*) shadow from the base stage of the LEM and the (*)(*)(*)(*) tire tracks from the lunar rover all over the place in the Apollo 17 landing site pictures. It's quite obvious what they are! Conspiracy theorists obviously have mental issues.
Of course there would be. There are always anomalies in everything. Theories of science such as gravity, relativety, magnetism all have anomolies. COmplex mathematical formulas always have anomolies. Events witnessed by many people ALWAYS have anomolies. Furthermore the so called anomolies you refer to are nothing of the sort they have been explained to you and debunked over and over you simply ignore facts.
Anomalies only prove the existence of anomalies, they don't prove faked photos. There have been plenty of proposed explanations to that effect. Anyway, faked photos wouldn't prove no man has ever been to the moon. Incidentally, why couldn't the anomalies in the photos themselves be faked?
Anomalies, in this case, means something that a denier doesn't (want to) and perhaps can't, understand. And the number of things that a denier cannot understand is, sadly, much greater than the world-wide average. So they see lots of anomalies. Added: BTW, Scott, why not pick your very favorite, absolute best, smokin' gun, killer anomaly. JUST ONE. The best example you can find. And I'll be happy to go through it point by point with a proper analysis. Are you up for it? This could be your big chance to show your knowledge and the soundness of your approach.
There are several anomalies that are so clear that any attempt to obfuscate them will be ineffective. This proves the hoax all by itself. [ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ymwE1sNm82Y"]Apollo 15 flag waving - YouTube[/ame] This video show that the flag started moving before the astronaut got close enough to touch it. [ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dW9qcL4LiUg"]Initial Apollo 15 Flag Movement - YouTube[/ame] This shows that the movement is not due to a film phenomenon. [ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oFMpmjEv9o0"]The flag that moved - YouTube[/ame] The movement is completely consistent with the atmosphere explanation. ---------------------------------------------------------------- MYthbuster ended up proving the opposite of what they'd set out to falsly prove when they tried to obfuscate the flag movement. [ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I7yc2rVOs00"]windyz.wmv - YouTube[/ame] (2:00 time mark) ---------------------------------------------------------------- The movement of the corner of Collins' jacket in this video is consistent with its being in strong gravity. They were supposed to be halfway to the moon when it was taken. [ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6fqdB1b53jc"]Apollo_11__The_TV_Transmission_Conspiracy_Theorists_Hate_.mp4 - YouTube[/ame] (00:52 time mark) Compare the movement of Collins' jacket corner fo the movement of the jacket corners in this clip. [ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DTNGNW5Evs4"]ISS space station treadmill running - YouTube[/ame] The corners move exactly the way the corner of Collins' jacket moves. Look at the way the straps attached to this astronaut's waist move. [ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1ofwzby1c7o"]Our World: Exercise Equipment - YouTube[/ame] (3:17 time mark) Just before she starts moving they are not hanging at her sides the way Collins' jacket corner does. They are floating. They also have no tendency do go downward when she's jogging in place the way Collins' jacket corner does. Look what happens at the 00:08 time mark in this video. [ame="http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=TejsnPThmd4"]Discovery Crew Enters International Space Station - YouTube[/ame] There is no tendency for the jacket corners to go downward as there is in the Apollo footage.
There are several anomalies that are so clear that any attempt to obfuscate them will be ineffective. This proves the hoax all by itself. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ymwE1sNm82Y This video show that the flag started moving before the astronaut got close enough to touch it. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dW9qcL4LiUg This shows that the movement is not due to a film phenomenon. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oFMpmjEv9o0 The movement is completely consistent with the atmosphere explanation. ---------------------------------------------------------------- MYthbuster ended up proving the opposite of what they'd set out to falsly prove when they tried to obfuscate the flag movement. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I7yc2rVOs00 (2:00 time mark) ---------------------------------------------------------------- The movement of the corner of Collins' jacket in this video is consistent with its being in strong gravity. They were supposed to be halfway to the moon when it was taken. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6fqdB1b53jc (00:52 time mark) Compare the movement of Collins' jacket corner fo the movement of the jacket corners in this clip. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DTNGNW5Evs4 The corners move exactly the way the corner of Collins' jacket moves. Look at the way the straps attached to this astronaut's waist move. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1ofwzby1c7o (3:17 time mark) Just before she starts moving they are not hanging at her sides the way Collins' jacket corner does. They are floating. They also have no tendency do go downward when she's jogging in place the way Collins' jacket corner does. Look what happens at the 00:08 time mark in this video. http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=TejsnPThmd4 There is no tendency for the jacket corners to go downward as there is in the Apollo footage.
I knew it. Scott, did you miss this?: Thread debunking the dreck presented by the last couple of moon hoax believers So, your best is not even worth the time you spent reposting it. Next. And I hope you enjoyed wasting your time reposting that inane drivel. If I was the forum owners, I'd be a tad miffed..
He didn't debunk that evidence. He only tried to obfuscate it. The viewers can read the part of the discussion that starts here... http://www.politicalforum.com/moon-...missions-were-faked-studio-5.html#post4105095 ...and decide whether he has any credibility. Sorry about the double post above. It was an accident.
In your opinion only, and you have shown that to be worthless. Why apologise - after all, the way you operate is to drown the discussion with lengthy diatribes, multiple irrelevant and flawed YouTube videos, and completely ignore facts. So double posts would be perfectly in line with your normal strategy. Anyway, end of discussion - I shall help you promote this stupidity no longer. Is there anyone convinced by any of Scott's arguments or has anything of actual substance, who would like to present that in their own words? Ever notice how many anomalies the last few surviving Apollo deniers can find? To educated folk (like the entire engineering and science regime), there are no anomalies... Gee. I wonder what that means...