Is "debate" really a debate when it's being "co-chaired" by an extreme activist who clearly favors only one view? Well, no, not really. But... The conclusions that will come out of this so-called debate are already a forgon conclusion; 1) punish capitalism, destroy it 2) allow world climate governance to control all economic functions 3) and allow no opposing views into the conversation.
Yes. This move says it all and it's why most people react with hostility to socialist "green" activists. Global warming is just a ruse to capture power and money. The pope is actively engaged in a sham.
There's always an issue like this needed to push sovereignty into more centralized organizations. With the US it was the supposed tariffs enacted by the States, with the EU it was monetary union and open borders, with the global government it will be climate change.
Correct, but I think the Pope is also knowingly engaged in this sham, which makes it even more egregious.
True, it is called a conference, however, how do you reach a binding agreement of all world nations if not debate? So, sure, it's called a conference and you could dance around and say the power players are 'negotiating', not debating over an agreement, but I don't dance. This so called "climate conference" is nothing more than hardcore anti-capitalists attempting to legislate globally using whatever doom and gloom climate predictions they've scripted to reach their objective.
Nope. What Redford, the Pope, hell..even Obama has said is not a theory, it's fact. But, if it's theories you're looking for, you can go to any climate doom & gloom site....they're chalked full of them. Or, you could just watch Gores movie. Knock yourself out.