Are you a brat? What year? There was NO consulate in Benghazi.. no diplomatic mission, no consular officers and no Marine Guard.
This is simply amazing. Are you really calling out people for mocking and making insulting names about Trump? Shall I list the 100’s he has created???? Glass houses
Lived there for a while. 1990-1997ish? It was a regional embassy, so security was still to be provided. That really doesn't have anything to do with the fact that Obama and co lied like crazy about it being cause by the video, which is the main point.
don't care. it was an organized terrorist attack by an "Al Qaeda-like group" (as Hillary wrote to her daughter on the day of the attack), it WAS NOT a 'spontaneous protest over a YouTube video that got out of control'
You are wonderful. Continue to cling to fragments of hope with your well chewed fingernails. I am never surprised by the depths the rabid lefties will sink to while trying to make a point that has no point. Kavanaugh appears to be a saint. I am torn between wanting him to get confirmed, or remaining on the DC Court of Appeals where he could potentially do much more damage to the lefties cause by following the U.S. constitution due to the fact he would rule over five times the number of cases he would if seated on the SC.
No.. There has never been a consulate in Benghazi. After ABQ 1950 .. my family was with Esso Libya in Tripoli.
Oooh ... I believe her already! Avanetti's defamation case against Trump has collapsed ... judge mulling tossing it entirely. Avanetti's got to get from underneath that bankruptcy somehow. Daniels is disposable I guess ...
Why would it risk her security clearence? Kavanaugh has held the highest and went through 4 security background checks when at the White House.
Benghazi is a non issue and always was. The entire thing was a total Farce drummed up by the Fox News Propaganda Machine and you know it.
Blah blah blah. It was a small fire fight. Obama and Hillary lying about it? Please. Not one cent was expended in actually investigating if the Bush administration covered things up in the vast majority of consulate attacks after 9/11. Not one right winger I know can tell me how many AMERICANS - contractors - died in Iraq. No one can because nobody cared. The entire thing was a political hatchet job and never merited an investigation on the scale that blow hard Gowdy insisted.
It's not about Kavanaugh it's about destroying someone for purly political reasons and more than that it's about our justice system. The new mantra from the left is guilty until proven innocent and accusers are always telling the truth. That rips at the very foundation of our country and puts us on par with the Soviet Union or any despot run country where you are imprisoned on suspicion and left there to rot. This is the totalitarian left on display
Lie-detector tests are so unreliable and easily manipulated by people who have had the training that they are not even admissible in a court of law! That's been true for decades! As far as 'credible' goes -- hey, I can produce 'witnesses' who will probably pass lie-detector tests affirming that there is a Santa Claus! So far, not even ONE credible charge has been thrown at Brett Kavanaugh which contains any evidence or proof at all! The entire Democrat strategy here is to delay, delay, delay, for as long as possible. During these idiotic, completely undeserved delays, they hope to 'turn' RINO's like Flake, Murkowski, and Collins, and bait them into voting against his confirmation. And if, despite all their made-up accusations Kavanaugh is confirmed anyway, then these deceitful liars can sing a "swan-song' to their radical 'faithful', energizing them to go swamp the mid-term election with 'revenge' in November....
Isn't this the same lawyer who says he has damning video's/DVD that will destroy Trump? He, ironically, never released those video's/DVD? He's either accepting a bribe from Trump to keep them under wraps which would taint his credibility or he never had said video's/DVD, which also taints his credibility. The left will do anything to destroy this man... It's absolutely sickening. Granted, if there is evidence of Kavanaugh's conduct, then he needs to be removed as a candidate for the position. By evidence, not hearsay or circumstantial as it really looks like the liberals are desperate and are fabricating a storm of accusations to destroy him. One thing the liberals are doing, however, is solidifying the rights base and ensuring a strong presence at the polls by this litany of attacks on individuals. See below. [youtube]bEcCXjTKdaY[/youtube] And if you find this acceptable, we should be able to do the same thing to these people who do this. Follow them everywhere and attack (verbally) them and their family! Nah, we aren't that low!
And the sad part is that you truly believe that some self-respecting prosecutor is going to try to charge a person with an impeccable life with a 36 year old ‘crime’ where the ‘victim’ can’t remember where or when It occurred.........and all of the ‘witnesses’ say they have no recollection of the event, Lord God.........I’ll give you funny.......delusional but funny
No one shred of evidence or corroboration from any of these "allegations". We can now destroy a man's person life and career with lies and Leftists celebrate it. #HIMTOO
Why do they like being lied to? I don't understand. I left the Democratic Party(whether they believe me or not) because the dishonesty was beyond my moral code of conduct(You know, those things.) When you've got these prominent people making false, slanderous claims that can never be proven(and that they have no intention of proving), it should really invoke some soul searching. No one ever pretended that Donald Trump was the perfect person, or the perfect President but the Left has largely pretended in my lifetime that it is the party of 'progressive values'. If lying and cheating to get what you want are some of those values, then I think the Left has lost the moral argument. Which in part is why we have Trump. To 64 million voters, it was all relative.
Always. I'll wait and see if she testifies. I'm no expert, but if she lies under oath, wouldn't that be enough to have security clearances revoked? And yeah, I've actually been on the fence and leaning to his side through all of this political theatre. It's way to well timed, coupled with the fact that the first accuser was known about since July. This is the only accusation that IF the individual actually testifies under oath, that I'd give some credibility to. The rest is just Dems throwing bombs trying to delay till the mid terms.
FBI Conducted Six Background Checks of Brett Kavanaugh ... https://www.lifenews.com/2018/09/20/fbi-conducted-six-background... Sep 20, 2018 · The FBI conducted six background checks, including for jobs Kavanaugh held in the White House and before he became a federal appeals judge in 2006. Sen. Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif., the ranking member of the Senate Judiciary Committee, revealed the existence of Ford’s letter days before the scheduled vote.