Auto-abortion: a marvelous feat of modern bio-engineering.

Discussion in 'Abortion' started by spt5, Dec 9, 2011.

  1. spt5

    spt5 New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 28, 2011
    Messages:
    1,265
    Likes Received:
    18
    Trophy Points:
    0
    The famous UCLA bio-engineering lab extention at its Bucharest experimental facility has finally achieved the symmetric distribution of pregnancy processes between mother and father. This ground breaking feat of engineering eliminates the unfair burden of pregnancy on women, who biology played that nasty trick on for centuries, forcing women to endure all pregnancy processes, whilst letting men free of it.

    In the new human pregnancy process, pregnancy initiates as usual, upon regular sexual activity. However, the baby's body parts will develop only partially, in BOTH the mother's and father's body.

    To conclude a birth, the initial sexual act that started the pregnancy has to be REPEATED after ~9 months, for the baby's body parts to enter final assembly. Then after a few days, the mother gives birth to the fully completed baby.

    A great advantage of this new human pregnancy process is that half of its load is saved away from the mother, thereby imposing a lot less negative impact on the mother's shape and general physical well being.

    An interesting aspect, as noted by the lead scientific team, is that if the initial sex is not repeated at ~ 9 month later, the baby's parts quickly disintegrate inside the mother and the father, and reduce the life expectancy of both father and mother by 10 years.

    Would you like to join the eager volunteers (formerly recruited from the Romania orphanages) to further advance these experiments? What is your opinion? And does this help to solve the abortion issue, or does this make it worse?

    Cheers everyone!

    ~spt5
    Securitate Interrogation Chamber, Bucharest, Romania
     
  2. Whaler17

    Whaler17 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2008
    Messages:
    27,801
    Likes Received:
    302
    Trophy Points:
    83
    What a complete waste of forum space.
     
  3. OKgrannie

    OKgrannie Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Aug 9, 2008
    Messages:
    10,923
    Likes Received:
    130
    Trophy Points:
    63
    So supposed this reduces the pregnancy burden on the woman, but the woman must give birth 100% of the time? Even so, this will be a great boon to the over-population problem.
     
    spt5 and (deleted member) like this.
  4. Whaler17

    Whaler17 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2008
    Messages:
    27,801
    Likes Received:
    302
    Trophy Points:
    83
    :roll:
    WOW, the clueless I guess don't see that this was a joke.
     
  5. OKgrannie

    OKgrannie Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Aug 9, 2008
    Messages:
    10,923
    Likes Received:
    130
    Trophy Points:
    63
    It's funny to divide the burden of pregnancy but leave 100% of birthing to women? HAHA!
     
  6. spt5

    spt5 New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 28, 2011
    Messages:
    1,265
    Likes Received:
    18
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Joke, yes, but not only. Every joke has some element of facts/views it propagates for discussion.
     
  7. Makedde

    Makedde New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Apr 16, 2008
    Messages:
    66,166
    Likes Received:
    349
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Its always interesting to wonder what the future could be like, but there are problems with your idea.

    What happens if the couple split up? If the woman has sex with a different man after nine months, what happens? And since the man (also with half a fetus) hasn't had sex with her, what happens to him?
     
  8. Whaler17

    Whaler17 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2008
    Messages:
    27,801
    Likes Received:
    302
    Trophy Points:
    83
    REally? Every joke? That is asinine.
     
  9. Blasphemer

    Blasphemer Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 2, 2011
    Messages:
    2,404
    Likes Received:
    53
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Interesting thought experiment to ponder - if men also carried fetuses like women, I have no doubt any talk about criminalising abortion would be opposed by all of them. :mrgreen:
     
  10. Pasithea

    Pasithea Banned at Members Request Past Donor

    Joined:
    Feb 26, 2011
    Messages:
    6,971
    Likes Received:
    83
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I don't think so.

    I think many men would stand by their pro-life beliefs just as many women do even if they could get pregnant. Although that's the thing. Every individual should have the right to choose. If people think abortion is wrong they should not be coerced or forced to have one, just like if someone wants an abortion they should not be coerced or forced to give birth.
     
  11. Whaler17

    Whaler17 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2008
    Messages:
    27,801
    Likes Received:
    302
    Trophy Points:
    83
    You are, once again, WRONG!
    You would, however, see men taking every precaution available to make sure they don't get pregnant.
     

Share This Page