I take 19 different medications a day for lots of physical problems. The total monthly bill for my medicine is 3,600 dollars. My total income is 1,900 dollars, my INSURANCE does the rest. My insurance keeps me alive, fact.
Abortion does not kill a baby. Abortion stops the process of creating a baby.What abortion does do is remove a fetus, that is it, nothing more or less. No babies are involved.!
Wrong again! "A baby goes through several stages of development, beginning as a fertilized egg. The egg develops into a blastocyst, an embryo, then a fetus." http://www.merckmanuals.com/home/wo...development_of_the_fetus.html?qt=fetus&alt=sh killing a fetus is clearly killing a baby.
I checked all the medical dictionary entries for "baby" at One Look Dictionary. Not a single one said a fetus is a baby: http://medical-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/baby
So NOW you abortion apologists want to use dictionaries, how funny is that!!!!! The Merck manual is a medical reference far more credible than any medical dictionary you can dredge up.
Well that is obviously false to anyone with even a rudimentary understanding of the English language. When you are talking about a baby beginning as a fertilized egg, you are obviously saying the baby exists at the beginning right? You seem very confused. Some people can only learn through repetition, so I will try to help you out here: "A baby goes through several stages of development, beginning as a fertilized egg. The egg develops into a blastocyst, an embryo, then a fetus."
This is laughable. First off it is not the purpose of the Merck manual to define what is human and what is not. This is not the "Domain" of Medicine. The Science that defines what is a human is Biology which trumps the opinion of any Doctor. Biologists claim that a zygote has the potential to develop into homo sapien/ human/ baby. They do not claim that the zygote is a homo sapien/human/baby.
you're the one giggling incessantly at everything. You tell me, IS this a game? if not, then stop with the mocking snickers and I will follow suit.
I think abortion should be legal, I just dont' think it should be used as birth control...it should be the absolute last resort and done early in the pregnancy.
so you are saying that medicine isn't science? and I love how you capitalize "Science" like someone would say "God"...how funny. Is that Freudian or did you mean to do that? you DO know that science never stays static, we learn new things all the time that changes theories and conclusions?
the people here that are prodeath want unrestricted abortions up to the moment of full seperation of baby from mother...they are even for the partial birth abortion.
The more "TRAP" regulations by the government, the more later abortions will be done. Things such as parental notification laws, 24 or 48 hour waiting periods, required ultrasounds, etc. serve to delay abortions when it is safer for a woman the earlier it is done.
Infanticide occurs on a baby between birth and the age of one year old. NOTICE THAT: Between BIRTH and ONE YEAR Before birth it is an abortion of a fetus, not a bay killing or infanticide.
I have good doctors they check to see what medications my insurance covers and see to it that those are the ones prescribed/
Why do you think babies get stressed if they are too long in the birth canal? But there is a difference in brain development between 30 weeks and 36 weeks.
Nope .. just not the Domain Science for distinguishing between human and non human. When Biologists start claiming that the zygote is a human "changing currently held theories and conclusions", then perhaps is the time to consider giving rights to zygotes, not before.
