Baldwin Calls for 'Overthrow of Trump' at Dem Fundraiser .....

The news you didn't know about that you already admitted to.....like the left mobbing politicians homes and offices. Getting violent. Like the Leftist that tried to stab a Repub candidate. Like the Demos making statements using innuendo to incite violence.

I didn't see anything in this thread about Tucker Carlson or Hannity. So deluding yourself as to what sources people are using. You need to do some research. As that leftist tactic don't work with people who use ALL sources, including those overseas.

Trumps rallies aren't being shown as much going into the election. Afterall they don't want to keep giving Trump or Repubs a lot of exposure. Can't have the Demos and their collective whining and making excuses about Trump and the Repubs got all that free air time.

 

I keep hearing that. He certainly has the money to go, huh?

 

Wrong on all counts.

 

Denying reality does not make your case.

 

The Trump protesters were there to cause a commotion and trouble. They went in with the knowledge they were not going to be welcomed and possibly tossed out. Going to a restaurant is different you go to relax and enjoy a meal not to be protested and threatened. Not to mention Pam Bondi being harassed at a movie theater.

 

Operative sentence here is:

"In an orderly and formal way, and lawful way, we need to overthrow the government of the United States under Donald Trump,” Baldwin said."

Voting came after that so his priority is overthrowing the government by such means as endless investigations based on made up charges.

 

Reality is the post I gave you to read and you responded by showing me a picture. You sure as hell made no case. My case was made in that post.

 

There were protests. What kind of threats?

 

Yawn. Keep on going, you're acting like you need a safe space.

It would be called an overthrow if the people voted him out and his Republican lackeys.

Grow up and stop acting so pathetic.

 

Spit upon and in your face actions. When someone gets in your face yelling that is threatening. Why would someone get in your face if it wasn't to suggest a threatening action? Pam Bondi is a woman, can you imagine a man spitting on a woman? Real cowardly for a man to do that to a woman.

 

After 8 years of Obama's stagnant malaise, Trump is proving Democrat ideas simply don't work. It scares them to derangement tactics.

 

Spitting is a hostile act. Was it reported that he spit on her? Did she say it? Proof? If there was no spittle on her or spittle that didn't match after a DNA test, then she must be lying. The flock needs proof, right?

 

Yes I made the case, and its clear you don't have a grasp on reality. Even saying Baldwin wasn't a comedian.

So basically you don't know much about politics. Hit me up when you finally start learning something. Then we will see if you can finally know what you are talking about.

If you can't …..stick to sports. You might do better.

 

This is getting too ridiculous to respond. Spitting on someone is never ok and yes it is hostile.

 

Yes, that is what he was doing to an extent, but at the same time he was putting in plain language what unhinged liberals wanted to hear....This not being a Presidential election year, it shows that an "overthrow" pursued by democrats is exactly what they want....To nullify the '16 election because they didn't like the result.

 

Can't be. He said orderly, formal and lawful.

It is funny how you guys all focus on one word and ignore that word in the context of everything else he said. It is absolutely clear that he was talking about "overthrowing" Trump by encouraging people to get out and vote. Kick the bums out at the ballot box. Nothing more.

You really need to go back into your safe spaces where these kinds of words won't trigger you.

 

Obviously he knows Mid Terms wont remove Trump or his Administration.

Of course saying something off the top of his head quickly would cause leftists to miss just what he was saying. The Norm when dealing with the Collective.

Plus he knows using that word would trigger the weak and meek followers of the left. Which is damn near all of them.

 

So, an "overthrow" or "silent coup" is exactly what you sick people are trying for eh?

 

What he was talking about was to "overthrow" the Republicans by getting out and voting against them.

That is absolutely clear from his remarks. But you guys pick up on one word and curl up into a ball in the corner and cry about it while sucking your thumbs.

 

I can't believe I have to explain this to you....Look, I know that this is a midterm election, and that the office of President is NOT on the ballot, so you claim of 'overthrow' meaning voting is only half true....The "overthrow", since the President can't be voted out, is meaning taking over The house, The Senate, or both, so that the "REAL overthrow" can take place through impeachment....

And let's say for a moment that your fever dream is realized....Do you really think that you won't pay a political price for what you want to happen?

My suggestion is that you libs get back to a real platform in American politics other than "Get Shorty".

 

FYI I'm not a lib.

I don't see anything about impeachment, even implied, in what Baldwin said. You're reaching. And I personally do not think there is enough evidence to impeach Trump at the moment. Maybe there will be when Mueller finishes his inquiry, but there isn't (in my opinion) now.

I think it would be a mistake for Ds to start down the path of impeachment if they win the House. Having said that, suppose for a moment that they did win the House and even the Senate. Suppose for a moment that they controlled huge majorities in both. Impeachment is a political process. To impeach the president would be completely legal. It would be entirely constitutional.

It would be politically stupid but it wouldn't be illegal, so you can't complain about the process.

But FFS read everything that Baldwin said. He was calling on people to get out and vote. Nothing else.

If anyone thinks it WAS something more than that, by all means point us to the concrete efforts to overthrow the government that have been triggered by his speech.

 

Voting them out = no overthrowing of "the government of the United States under Donald Trump."

"Under Donald Trump" you cannot overthrow the government of the United States by voting.

Impeachment for political gain, is what domestic enemies do.

I swore an oath to protect and defend the constitution against all enemies foreign and DOMESTIC, that now includes DEMOCRATS. Even if I wanted to vote for one, like I voted for Nelson previously, I cannot do so, it would violate my oath to vote DEMOCRAT.

 

I love that leftists pretend there is no trend, and that it is not spiking upwards.

https://www.foxnews.com/entertainment/rosie-odonnell-wants-military-to-get-trump-from-white-house

 

That is the point. Where is the proof except for her word? By the way, I believe her even without proof and I believed Dr. Ford even
without proof.

 

And?