Barr says he thinks spying occurred on 2016 Trump campaign

Say what ???

"Barr says he thinks spying occurred on 2016 Trump campaign"

Holy crap !!!

Was the Obama administration a administration of spooks ?

For the low information...
Why are spies called “spooks”?
https://english.stackexchange.com/questions/2340/why-are-spies-called-spooks


Who ordered the spying ?

What did Obama know and when did he know it ?

Did a crime occured and if so is it a huge felony ?

A capital offense ?

Who all was involved in the spying or were aware of the spying ?

The FBI ?

CIA ?

NSA ?

Mi-6 ?

NYT, WaPo, CNN, MSNBC ?

Was Hillary involved or was aware of the spying ?

Was the DNC involved or was aware of the spying ?

Was MS-13 involved ?

 

Barr clearly loves the Dirty Donald Kool Aid.

 

If the spying was conducted by an intelligence agency like the CIA or NSA you don't have a problem with that ?

I don't think the CIA is allowed to spy on American citizens.

Back during the J. Edgar Hoover FBI the FBI spied on Americans and Americans weren't happy campers about it when they found out during the early 1970's and the FBI had to clean house.

J. Edgar Hoover had a **** file on every President from FDR to Nixon.

 

The dems were serving up koolaid with the trump putin conpiracy claims, they were just so sure of it. Looking into if the spying involved into the trump campaign was done legally isn't nearly as large a glass of koolaid as the dems served up.

Questions need to be answered, and I as a non trump voter want to know the truth, given we had the CIA spy on its own oversight committee and intel heads lying under oath to congress. And those incidents are not koolaid, and show something obvious. Our intel, at the high levels are scumbag treasonous bastards. And could have been indulging in that same behavior in regards to trump's campaign. Any reasonable person would suspect it, and want to know, and to have justice served.

Only the dems don't give a damn, about any of it! They see reality through a political, partisan prism. That could not be more obvious. I think they would even love a banana republic just as long as the democrats ran it. But totally unacceptable if the GOP ran it. They only have higher principles when the opposition don't exercise them. Looks like a fact to me.

 

Politically speaking it's turning out to be a very, VERY bad year for the Left because all their schemes against Trump have fallen apart and now the actual and real investigation into what really happened, and why, is beginning; and in turn that is going to turn a very unfriendly spotlight of the mindbogglingly corrupt Obama administration of political thugs. The Left and also their RINO allies are going to continue being . . . unhappy. Sweet!

 

The Washington Swamp was obviously very, very, very, very scared that if he became President.... he would begin a clean up operation.


https://www.nytimes.com/elections/2016/results/district-of-columbia

I am convinced that President Donald Trump has been out to fix flaws in Federal Reserve policy since 1991.


Did going bankrupt in '91 prepare Mr. Trump for the Presidency?



https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Donald_Trump

 

Trump is actually trying to fix a corrupted and mostly broken Washington, D.C.; and that's why the Leftist leadership and their equally anti-ethical and corrupt RINO political allies hate the man's guts. Well they tried and failed to overthrow a duly elected president via a soft coup attempt; and now it is their turn inside the barrel. This is going to be fun.

 

I agree that that is exactly what is happening..... and yes... I am having fun watch and imagine what will happen next.

Do you think that I am naive to think that Prime Minister Pierre E. Trudeau was probably pressured into making arguably the greatest error by a sitting Canadian Prime Minister back in 1974?


Can we learn about the Washington Swamp from the Ottawa Swamp?



After P. M. Pierre E. Trudeau's colossal error here is how the national debt of
Canada spiralled out of control:



My guess is that he was pressured into doing this so that the same thing could be
arranged in the USA:




Imagine what would happen if the brilliant Canadian banking and taxation system of 1940 - 1974 had continued?

Could a plan go into motion to spiral the USA national debt out of control compared to a good system continuing in Canada??????

 

I would not be the least bit surprised.

 

Update:

So it may have been the FBI higher echelon who were politicized and went rogue for the Democrats.

The FBI leadership became politicized under the Obama administration and went back to J. Edgar Hoover's old ways.

So banana republic of the FBI.

First it was the DNC who was exposed being a corrupt banana republic political organization and now the FBI.

 

For all of his many, many, many, many flaws Prime Minister Pierre E. Trudeau was an economist and would NOT have agreed to a policy change that would set in motion TWENTY SIX THOUSAND PERCENT INFLATION on net interest over a twenty two year time span unless he was pressured into doing so by somebody (or more likely a group)..... with serious power??????

https://www.michaeljournal.org/arti...ce-our-country-debt-free-say-three-economists

 

Open Senate and House hearings on all of those you are accusing. Haul them all into Senate and House open hearings. I am sure they all would love the opportunity to come and testify. Now you got your boy, Barr as AG. Bring it on.

 

Mr. Barr has been listening to too much Mr. Limbaugh. Of course, Barr is a Trump butt-kisser and this is all to energize the far-right for 2020.

 

Nobody was saying that when Trump first nominated Barr as Sessions replacement.

 

It's pretty obvious that Barr is trying to push the Mueller report under the rug. The investigators had prepared summaries for public release, yet Barr ignored those and released his own pro-Trump gibberish.

Mueller never possessed the authority to indict a sitting president. Only Barr can do that. Barr is either a corrupt Trump butt-kisser or he is a coward.

 

2016 election
Barr donated $55,000 to Jeb Bush during the 2016 United States presidential election

Maybe you would have preferred that Eric Holder or Loretta Lynch was the AG ?

 

EVERYONE with sense saw a PROVEN cover up man (Iran Contra), who auditioned for the job as Attorney General of The Trump Corporation (because he CLEARLY has no interest in representing America), got it, and is now trying to rush a coverup here, which will blow back on him. Just because you weren't among those folks, that didn't see it, is hardly anyone else's fault.

That's the problem. Barr overestimated himself, got all cocky cuz he pulled the wool over Americas eyes for Raygun And Bush Senior. Thought he could come in and do the Same for Trump. He didn't take account that he doesn't have the timeline to let the fury die before he has to completely blow his ethical responsibilities, and he's being loyal to a boss that will knife him in the back in an instant if he feels Barr "messed up" (if Trump messes up and someone doesn't clean it up for them it's the other guys fault ALWAYS and everyone knows Trump has known that forever).

Barrr is probably already beginning to realize he done screwed up BIG, by even getting near the Trump regime. He still has the arrogant belief that he can slither through the swamp and get by with it, but I think even he's starting to suspect, this is gonna roll over him before he has any time to really save this.

But, enjoy your active fantasy life till then, You WILL be needing it.

 

Such is the conspiracy theory. Ask yourself why the dem clown show is not asking Mueller to testify.

 

They did prepare summaries, but Barr didn't ignore them. It seems like he relied on those to get his summary out in just 2 days. read the summaries, found they had no evidence of collusion and were ambivalent on obstruction, so he summarized based on the summaries. It has been reported they can't release the summaries without redacting as they also include grand jury material, cover ongoing investigations, would harm the reputation of peripheral unindicted people or mention intelligence sources and methods.

No, if the DoJ holds the view a sitting president cannot be indicted, then the AG can't do this either, a president who should be prosecuted is supposed to be impeached.

Or Mueller actually couldn't find enough evidence to sustain an indictment. Your conclusion suggests you are certain it is impossible Trump did not collude.

 

The only thing Barr was legally obliged to provide Congress was his summary. He does not need to provide anything else. He is going above and beyond what he is legally obliged to provide yet the TDS sufferers are all conspiracy theory over it.

 

Perhaps they will start with the low hanging fruit.
https://www.wsj.com/articles/former-obama-white-house-counsel-expects-to-be-indicted-11554940801

 

I still don't understand the argument that Obama was corrupt so it's okay that Trump is

 

Who said it's OK? All you need to do is provide proof, something that has yet to be shown.

 

A threat to our democracy.
We need an investigation.

 

You're getting warmer

https://www.vox.com/world/2018/9/12/17764132/trump-fbi-russia-new-york-times-craig-unger