BEST Zapruder Stabilized to date: 2013 (amazing)

Discussion in 'JFK' started by Validation Boy, Nov 19, 2013.

You are viewing posts in the Conspiracy Theory forum. PF does not allow misinformation. However, please note that posts could occasionally contain content in violation of our policies prior to our staff intervening.

  1. Brother Jonathan

    Brother Jonathan Banned

    Joined:
    Nov 16, 2013
    Messages:
    1,610
    Likes Received:
    4
    Trophy Points:
    0
    That has been explained a million times. If you don't understand it then that is your problem not mine. Newton's second law of motion and the third law of motion were not violated on 9/11 but they were only claimed to be violated by the official NIST report. It is impossible to violate natural laws of motion but NIST claimed, and reported, that Newton's laws of motion were in fact violated on 9/11 from 8:30 AM until 9:30 AM on 9/11 with the collapse of two towers, and Newton's laws of motion were again violated from 5:20 PM and 5:22 PM on 9/11 with the collapse of building 7, only in New York City. Nowhere else in the entire world either before or after those times has it ever happened. It was, and is, impossible. Without a doubt.
     
  2. Ronstar

    Ronstar Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2013
    Messages:
    93,457
    Likes Received:
    14,675
    Trophy Points:
    113
    NIST never made such a claim. You defame the 9-11 victims by making such assertions.
     
  3. Brother Jonathan

    Brother Jonathan Banned

    Joined:
    Nov 16, 2013
    Messages:
    1,610
    Likes Received:
    4
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Jackie picked up JFK brain matter from the trunk and gave it to the doctors at Parkland hospital. That fact is documented.
     
  4. Ronstar

    Ronstar Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2013
    Messages:
    93,457
    Likes Received:
    14,675
    Trophy Points:
    113
    they also found brain matter infront of JFK's seat.
     
  5. Soupnazi

    Soupnazi Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2008
    Messages:
    18,909
    Likes Received:
    3,589
    Trophy Points:
    113
    No you are merely repeating yourself with a little more detail concerning the time.

    You cannot and never have answered what these laws state and specifically how they were violated.

    You refuse to do so because you do not even comprehend the laws of physics all you do is repeat that they were violated.

    - - - Updated - - -

    Yes it is and much of it was also splattered on the front of the limo.

    What you ignoe is that the limo was MOVING.

    Much of the material actually shot up in the air while the car was moving forward under it.

    This explains how some material landed on the back of the car but not on the front and windshield UNLESS he was shot from behind.
     
  6. Hannibal

    Hannibal New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2009
    Messages:
    10,624
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    0
    No it isn't. Repeating that lie ad nauseum won't make it true.
     
  7. Brother Jonathan

    Brother Jonathan Banned

    Joined:
    Nov 16, 2013
    Messages:
    1,610
    Likes Received:
    4
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Your inability to understand Newton's laws of motion is your problem not mine. I understand them.

    Demonstrate with proof that Jackie Kennedy did not hold some of JFK's brain matter in her hand until she saw the doctors at Parkland hospital.
     
  8. Soupnazi

    Soupnazi Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2008
    Messages:
    18,909
    Likes Received:
    3,589
    Trophy Points:
    113
    If you understood them you could explain them and then specifically explain how the NISt report claimed they were violated you are incapable of doing neither.

    I never claimed she did not do this I clearly stated she did you ignored why it is irrelevant
     
  9. Brother Jonathan

    Brother Jonathan Banned

    Joined:
    Nov 16, 2013
    Messages:
    1,610
    Likes Received:
    4
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Read the report for yourself: If you understand the laws of physics then you will understand the report. If not then you may be prone to spread a lie. Are you are a liar or are you a teller of truth? NIST
     
  10. Ronstar

    Ronstar Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2013
    Messages:
    93,457
    Likes Received:
    14,675
    Trophy Points:
    113
    if he was a liar, he's be part of the 9-11 Trough Movement.
     
  11. Soupnazi

    Soupnazi Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2008
    Messages:
    18,909
    Likes Received:
    3,589
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Unlike you I have indeed read it and you are outright lying when you claim it violated the laws of physics.

    This is why you always run from stating specifically where and how they stated anything of the sort.
     
  12. Brother Jonathan

    Brother Jonathan Banned

    Joined:
    Nov 16, 2013
    Messages:
    1,610
    Likes Received:
    4
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I don't run from anything Soupnazi. What are you talking about?

    - - - Updated - - -

    Mod Edit ~ Focus on the topic. Don't make it personal.

    The NIST report is a lie. Read it for yourself.
     
  13. Soupnazi

    Soupnazi Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2008
    Messages:
    18,909
    Likes Received:
    3,589
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Explain specifically which laws of physics the NIST report claims were violated.

    How they were violated and where in the NIST report they made this claim.

    I have my copy handy right here so include page numbers.
     
  14. Brother Jonathan

    Brother Jonathan Banned

    Joined:
    Nov 16, 2013
    Messages:
    1,610
    Likes Received:
    4
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Good grief. Does not anyone anymore understand the laws of motion? Good grief. I am living in a time of total ignorance because of government indoctrination? Why don't you take a physics class? A real physics class. Jonathan Cole explains. If you don't understand the videos then take a physics class for God's sake.
     
  15. Soupnazi

    Soupnazi Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2008
    Messages:
    18,909
    Likes Received:
    3,589
    Trophy Points:
    113
    We were discussing the NIST report not a video and you do not understand them if you cannot answer the question.

    You claimed you never run but that is precisely what you are doing running away from a difficult question you are too ignorant to give a specific answer to
     
  16. Brother Jonathan

    Brother Jonathan Banned

    Joined:
    Nov 16, 2013
    Messages:
    1,610
    Likes Received:
    4
    Trophy Points:
    0
    What question?
     
  17. Angedras

    Angedras New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2011
    Messages:
    8,178
    Likes Received:
    168
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Attention ~

    Stop the baiting and insulting.

    If unable to contribute to the discussion in a positive manner, leave the thread.
     
  18. Hannibal

    Hannibal New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2009
    Messages:
    10,624
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    0
    NIST never made any such claim. Seems we are all in agreement.
     
  19. 9/11 was an inside job

    9/11 was an inside job Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 8, 2011
    Messages:
    6,508
    Likes Received:
    109
    Trophy Points:
    63
    it sure is their problem if they can understand newtons laws of physics or use logic and common sense that Jackie retrived brain matter from the back of the limo behind them giving it to the doctors.:roflol:
     
  20. Soupnazi

    Soupnazi Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2008
    Messages:
    18,909
    Likes Received:
    3,589
    Trophy Points:
    113
    It is you lacking comprehension of physics and if you had read the posts you would know that it is irrelevant what she did.
     
  21. Libertarianforlife

    Libertarianforlife Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 16, 2013
    Messages:
    1,410
    Likes Received:
    62
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Except the documentary that showed photos of kennedys skull showed a bullet hole dead center in the back (entry) and a large hole front right top (exit.)

    Debunked.
     
  22. Validation Boy

    Validation Boy Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 13, 2012
    Messages:
    3,748
    Likes Received:
    29
    Trophy Points:
    48
    You can't debunk something with sources that emulate from the conspirators themselves.

    Duh.
     
  23. Libertarianforlife

    Libertarianforlife Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 16, 2013
    Messages:
    1,410
    Likes Received:
    62
    Trophy Points:
    48
    There was no bias in the source. You CAN debunk something with actual photographs and science, which is what it showed. There was a single hole through the skull, from roughly center of the back to the front right. There was more scientific experimentation with bullet ballistics, timing, etc in that documentary than this edited video in the OP showed. Not to mention the one thing that doesn't lie, the photograph. There is one hole dead in the center of the back of his head.

    God, you'd think idiots that believe conspiracy theories would at least believe something that a simple photo on wikipedia couldn't prove wrong.

    [​IMG]

    Debunked.
     
  24. 9/11 was an inside job

    9/11 was an inside job Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 8, 2011
    Messages:
    6,508
    Likes Received:
    109
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Debunked my foot.using proven faked forgeries doesnt debunk anything.:roflol:

    the best photography experts around the world have concluded those are forgeries.:weed::roflol:

    you would think that idiots who believe in the conspiracy theory of the governments that oswald was the lone assassin would take the time to listen to what the doctors said.what the dallas doctors saw was TOTALLY different than what that fake photo shows. why is it that magic bullet theorists always bltantly ignore facts what the dallas doctors said they saw and what photography experts from around the world say?:weed: comedy gold.:roflol:
     
  25. Libertarianforlife

    Libertarianforlife Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 16, 2013
    Messages:
    1,410
    Likes Received:
    62
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Prove with a reliable source that photo is fake or retract immediately.
     

Share This Page