Wow, this is pretty serious stuff. Just wondering if the liberals on here agree with Pres. Clinton or if they disagree with his assessment. He is stating what most of us on the right have been saying since day one.
This is like a paradox to stupid liberals (i know, i dnt have to put the stupid qualifier ther as we all know they are just that, stupid.). Do they follow their only mildly successful president or do they follow their current failure?
This is some pretty shocking stuff, provided there is truth to the excerpts. What source does the author quote?
I know....he's pursuing it all "under the radar". People will be livid when they find out how much of it he's really institutionalized in bureaus and regulations. Tellin' ya, hon - this country does NOT want collectivism. The giant is only now coming out of Rem.
I know, obviously the corporatist president we now have, is a full blown marxist revolutionary fighting agains global capitalism, by doing everything he can to support the global capitalist elite!! You see, it is all part of his cunning plan to hide his marxism. He will act absolutely NOTHING like a marxist, while secretly being a marxist. Good thing for right wing psychic abilities, because otherwise we would never know about his cunning plan, since his actions would make one erroneously think he was a corporatist tool!!
I hate Obama, but am certain that it didn't happen. It was made up. Not surprising. These sorts of books come out pretty often, quoting unnamed sources, but only get any tread in kook corners of the internet, because any real journalist would say "bill Clinton did you say those things" Bill Clinton would then obviously say "no" and then the story is over. However, when you are making things up to sell a book to partisan hacks, who cares about things like that? PS. As if there aren't enough sourced things to criticize Obama about, why is inventing lies necessary?
Yes, of course. Unsourced quotes. That is acceptable if the journalist has some credibility. Obviously Edward Klein has none.
when corporatism and marxism shake hands, then you have Obama. Fascist. Bill is an amateur. He was boosted to the high-chair because he was the overseer of all of the drugs that George Sr's CIA was smuggling into Arkansas. CIA agents have spoken about this plenty of times. Just look at Bill's red nose and his cokehead brother. Hillary was always higher on the reptile chain than Billy Boy. they knew things in 1911, when this cartoon was drawn, that has been buried in this time. Here's Obama shaking hands with his Wall St masters.
Clinton sold out America by supporting and signing NAFTA and GATT...He's a filthy whore and full partner in the Bush Crime family. When are you dupes going to realize that the only difference between the demikins and the republicrats anymore is the rhetoric....Until we clean house, it doesn't matter one bit who gets elected as they are all owned by the same foreign entity.... BushI=Clinton=BushII=Obama=Romney..... Our country has been under the control of corporate fascists since Reagan was shot by a freind of GHW Bush.....Since then it has been a steady decline into totalitarionism and destruction of the US Constitution....How have the major oil companies and defense contractors fared in this horrible economy while poeople are losing their homes and their aquired wealth? Get a grip you nit wits... "I believe that banking institutions are more dangerous to our liberties than standing armies. If the American people ever allow private banks to control the issue of their currency, first by inflation, then by deflation, the banks and corporations that will grow up around the banks will deprive the people of all property until their children wake-up homeless on the continent their fathers conquered." -Thomas Jefferson
Imagine, if you worked for the federal government you would be implementing those commie regulations that you hate so much. You would then be a commie!
Do you think that the new people you want to put in power won't also fall prey to those evil corporate fascists?
And foot notes lol! Don't forget footnotes! Those little bastards that authors with bad sources love... like Ann Coulter.
Does anyone really think that Clinton would engage in such reprehensible behavior? I know he has a multitude of faults but I'm doubtful that he would cross the line and make such insulting remarks.
It would have been a waste of time for the little woman to challenge Obama. Or any white for that matter. Blacks hold an insurmountable advantage in Democrat primaries that could mean every Democrat nominees in the future will be black.
It's about as reprehensible as the time Obama left Bill Clinton at the podium to finish answering questions from the press for him because Obama had to tend to the First Ho.