Bloombergmania is the Rage in Trumpdom!

They are squealing like viagra-overdosing swine in heat, and Mayor Mike hasn't even brought Bolton, Cohn, Kelly, Tillerson, Mattis, McMaster, McChrystal, McGhan, Sondland, Taylor, Cooper, Yovanovich or Vindman on board his campaign yet.

​

Trumpers are asking, "Can Fake Don hide the sworn testimony of Bolton, his tax returns, and his DNA?"

With his scary talk, the Mooch has some hard cases wetting their cribs.

 

Obviously I intended to say Bloomberg and not Bernie. A lapse in concentration.

 

So true. Mike does not like what he calls dirt.

 

Speaking of Smarter..."100 times smarter" sounds like an ignorant at best argument. I guess I could retort by saying Trump has a taller building nanny nanny boo boo.

 

I hope he gets pummeled in tonight's debate. Bloomberg is most likely trying to get Trump re-elected.

 

Thats what most did last election, do you see where it got us? I dont buy Bloombergs BS.

 

Hardcore Trumpthumpers are in a tizzy over Bloomberg.

In Fake Don's policy of outsourcing, maybe he can get Ukraine or China to contrive some dirt on him!

 

So the gist of your OP is that there's too many threads about Bloomberg and your conclusion - certainly one HereWeGoAgain hath writ and that you appear to agree with - is that this is because the RW fears him. The problem with your thesis is that a quick perusal of threads that you yourself created - which can be found HERE and that's just counting the threads with the word "Trump" in them, there's far more without his name included in the search where the OP revolves around Trump anyway - indicates that you yourself have made nine pages full of Trump threads over the years, and countless more relating to the general theme. The real conclusion is that you yourself must be terrified of Trump and or your "hysteria", as you yourself put it, is possibly a form of projection? I mean, surely what you have done is overkill?

To be sure, I don't mean that you are afeared in the general sense of being afraid of what he might do, but rather in the same way you imagine the RW to be afraid of Shorty B. And if a mere five threads indicates hysteria, what does the number of threads you yourself (being merely one man) have writ indicate? I daresay I shall leave the conclusions to others, sirrah.

I myself posit that you yourself, as well as some members of the Left on this forum, are mayhap in consternation regarding the number of unpleasant tidings made known of Sir Bloomberg, and this is a means of trying to control the debate. Nay, sirrah - not as long as he stays in the news.

I bid thee good fortune.

 

Ha! Wouldn't it be a hoot if all those rich old White men on stage accused Mike of being rich, old, and White?

 

I see it didn't take long for the other shoe to drop.

So AJ, as I and many others here have noted, whenever a thread drops in Current Events that fails to meet your standards, you invariably post something like "Where is the link? There is no link!" or "The title is misleading!" or "This is not a current event! This belongs in (fill-in-the-blank). Or noting some duplicate Thread. Or the OP refers to a story from such and such time ago. I have to commend you for your fastidiousness in searching out ways a thread you disapprove of does not meet your standards, but pray tell - what IS the current event in the OP? Or the link? Are threads at PF Considered current events? Hmm, there's a link in the OP but it's over a year old. And yet somehow you've seemed to overlooked all of that. It makes one wonder if there's some kind of double-standard going on as this thread must surely belong in the opinion section. Oh, don't worry - I reported it, Thanks for Asking.

I can't speak for Trump world, but I can Speak for myself. I doubt anyone is Afraid of Shorty B. But I am Amused at the pretzel shapes the LW is twisting Themselves in trying To defend Bloomy. And that's what you're seeing - the absolute Laughter at the Left while it's defending Bloomy.

The LW can complain all it wants about the threads Mocking Bloomy. Keep complaining, it'll Just make our laughter all the Sweeter. And the Threads coming all the More.

Oh, and if you don't like Trump? You're free Not to vote for him.

So, there's THAT.

 

The laughter is as sweet as can be.

 

Because.........??

 

~ I hope Bloomberg is the candidate Trump goes up against - especially if he drags Hillary along. He will be easy and amusing to defeat. Sanders is more popular and likely could be a lot harder to deal with.

 

And why shouldn't he have to? He is a Democrat only because of his disdain of firearms. The rest of his views align perfectly with the RNC.

Harass people of color for no reason? CHECK

Demean, insult, and make fun of women? CHECK

His entire political history is pulled straight from the RNC playbook.

Bernie is going to tear him a new one...

 

In 2011 Bloomberg said, "Some blacks and Hispanics just don't know how to behave in the workplace".

Wow. And Trump is the racist.

 

Not without precedent.

"FOUR MORE YEARS~ FOUR MORE YEARS!"​

 

it went beautifully. Bloomer was gobsmacked, but will persist in spending a fortune exposing Fake Don.

Maybe Trump and his butt remoras can now stop weeing their frillies over their fear of Li'l Mike and resume their dung-flinging at more promising prospects.

 

He’s a con man who told people what they wanted to hear.

 

If you need to contrive an equivalency between an incumbent, impeached POTUS running for re-election and a guy without a single delegate who hasn't held political office for six years, you can, of course, but rational folks readily recognize which merits the preponderance of attention.

As a practical matter, a strategy like railing "Lock him up! Lock him up!" at a fizzling Bloomer and/or insisting that he is a foreign-born Muslim may be misdirected, mindless rage at this juncture.

 

~ And then he actually went to work doing exactly what he told the people he would do.

 

Fantasizing that there can be only one "racist" is wishful thinking, indeed.

As a certitude, there are folks of every demographic who do not know how to behave in the workplace - e.g., Trump.

 

But if thou, maychance, doth not understand that a man - yes, but one man who hath injected himself into the political arena mayhap doth make the news - and that, sirrah, this be a public forum where we doth discuss events which are current and upon the tongues of those that dally in such news, than thou dost not comprehend where thou be.

For in thine fear and fury at Trump, though hast writ so much that thine own motivations be suspect, yea more suspect than those that penned the quintet of threads thou dost abhor.

 

Releasing his tax returns, immediately repealing 'ObamaCare' and replacing it with "something terrific!" that "covers everybody!" at "less cost!", reviving coal mining and steel manufacturing, rebuilding the nation's crumbling infrastructure, withdrawing all US forces from Afghanistan, reducing the bloated national debt, outsourcing dirt-digging to Ukraine, et., etc., etc., etc.,...

 

And in his particular case, it was what we wanted to hear...

We’re all not racist and homophobic.
Our country doesn’t suck.
Our country is more important than 3rd world **** Holes.
Our citizens are more Important than illegals.
Borders matter.
The 2ndA and free speech is more important than totalitarianism and the govt boot on our necks
Capitalism is a good thing.
Freedom isn’t free.
“Free stuff” actually costs money and guess who pays?
And soldiers are allowed to defend themselves FIRST and not wait to be killed...like Obama decreed!!!!

I know I know. Terrible concepts.