Bombing victims,or actors?

You are really reaching here.

Yes, clothes can be ripped off of the body by concussion waves and not leave a mark on the body.

I'm guessing the 2nd guy was in shock. He stood up, was confused about his pants, got light headed from shock and sat back down.

I think you are seeing phantoms where none exist.

 

You know those are sweat pants right? The "stretchy" kind.

She also lost hearing in right ear, and had shrapnel all along the side of her body. Let's just sweep that under the rug and use her as a conspiracy tool, shall we?

 

She was taken to a major medical facility in a big city in the states, not wounded on a battle field, transported while a medic kept her alive and was rushed to a doctor that came 104th in his graduating class.

 

Of course, you always have 101 reasons to justify. But could you explain the following inconsistencies?

,

 

Was not there, cant confirm any of that. But you can find 101 inconsistancies all day long as well about it and it still comes down to those two brothers did it.
Not some shadow organization within the government. Just like 9/11 was not the a self inflicted attack, this was not either.

 

They did not have reporters embedded with the SWAT teams.

Orally-transmitted data gets mangled in an OH (*)(*)(*)(*) scenario. I have seen fire department after-action reports that describe the same event in conflicting manners. whoop

 

Well in terms of shots being fired I was watching CNN and one of their reporters broke in to say he'd just heard about 10 shots fired. He was not reporting second hand information, he was claiming he'd heard the shots himself. So it does not take long for something to become public memory of an event.

 

Yes because we all know how calm and relaxed we are after being stunned. For all we know that guy might have thought he was sitting down on his couch to watch the afternoon baseball game, and could not find the beer he'd just opened

 

I once fell out of a jeep moving at 35 MPH. After the nearly 40 yard roll/skid my new Levis as well as my shirt were eviscerated. I had a scratch on my left thumb. No bruises, contusions or broken bones.

So yes. It is possible.

 

yes it is possible. concussion rips clothes quite easily, it's the shareds of metal that cause the horrific wounds that bleed. ever seen an old flag, tattered and torn? that's done by years of wind. press all that wind into a fraction of a second and you have a bomb blast.

 

look! her boyfriend changed clothes too! for the record-that pink thing over her wound isn't a pant leg, it's a "sock". trauma units have all sorts of specialty clothing.

 

i skinned my knee once thru a pair of Dockers...pants were barely scuffed.

 

WTF is a "crisis actor"? I need a conspiracy dictionary to keep up with this crap.

 

come'on. they're legitmate questions.

 

To quote Hillary: "What difference does it make?"

It seems conspiracy theorists are as ubiquitous as there are shooters and bombers in the US. But, you have to admit the Keystone Kops investigation of this bombing kind of asks for this kind of thing.

Frankly there's a whole lot of reasons that guy could be standing up, it looks to me like he got something stuck to his leg. It is not odd at all until we start seeing it in slow mo over and over.

There's the conspiracy. Hey I got visual affects software too. I can make it look like the moon is eating your green cheese. Let's all remember that this is the 21st century; "nothing is real."

 

It's amazing that actors could so love their craft, that they would be willing to lose arms and legs.

 

9/11 started a cottage industry of lunatics that sit at home spouting bull (*)(*)(*)(*) 24 hours per day.
They can tell you who really brought down the HIndenburg but they can't explain the giant gaping holes they have left in their retelling of the Boston bombing (because it happened practically right before everyon's eyes and is the best documented act of terrorism ever).
I admit I absolutely think the Warren Commission was lying through their teeth but that doesn't mean every single event of terrorism we see is
being orchestrated by the Illuminati (or whoever).

The internet encourages this stupidity and often one fool will egg on the other.

 

Aha....a thinking man!'


What I have always found amusing is that any theory has to be subject to scrutiny, but most of these don't get past basic Bolean logic. Recently I heard again how the NASA moon missions were faked and the speaker had a lot of reasonable sounding data to support it. I turned to him an said "OK, so you're saying that with the whole world watching, the Russians scrutinizing every step the same administration that could not keep a lid on a third rate burglary in the Watergate Hotel complex managed to fool the entire world, the Soviets, the British, the Chinese and three TV networks....and, you are the only one to have figured it all out and lived."

There's where it breaks down. I was a reporter for over 30 years and I made my living on people more than willing to talk for a variety of reasons, jilted lovers, pissed off workers, political enemies, it doesn't matter but little brown envelopes used to appear in my office rather routinely.

I don't think the Warren Commission covered anything up...I KNOW THEY DID. Look, "Early" Warren wasn't known for aggressiveness in the law and neither was Gerry Ford. I've read the report and all the books about it I could get my hands on and the amount of evidence they chose not to look at is not exactly overwhelming, selective actually, in that anything that didn't fit the depository/single gunman theory simply did not exist in their world. I saw it all go down on TV, including the Jack Ruby shooting and I knew something sucked even at 14.

But that is a far, far cry from saying the CIA or J Edgar or Johnson did it. Fact is, now that they've set the release of evidence back to 70 years from 50, no one who was alive at the time will ever be able to try to find out. If that doesn't convince you they're keeping something from us, nothing will.

 

Good stuff.

And that is why I reject outlandish conspiracy theories such as this. Look, in one thread there are four different and distinct impressions of what the man in shorts is doing and I doubt any of them is right.

But, we have granted extra-ordinary powers, powers that suspend our liberties, in the name of security.

But the security isn't there. Further, inconsistencies mount about what the different police agencies have said, there are serious questions about whether federal officials were running an operation or a drill and there are gaping holes and inconsistencies about the shooting and arrest between the Boston cops and the FBI.

With that, the citizenry should be demanding an accounting on whether these extraordinary measures are working, necessary or even valid. And finally, in light of the inconsistencies, can we trust them with these powers.

I sure doesn't look like it.

 

To another thinking man..............At the risk of having this thread moved away, check out the evidence that was destroyed, "lost" or altered by the Warren Commission (the president's very own brain, the limosine JFK was shot in, his clothing, etc.).

I too was sitting at home waiting to go to church and watching the news on live television when Jack Ruby was allowed to loiter in the basement of the Dallas jail, armed and among friends and clients of his Dallas strip joint when Lee Harvey Oswald was being transfered under their "watch". I will never forget what I saw.
When you look at who would benefit from continually pushing back the date for release of Warren Commission material back you would have to say it's the same people who staged the "investigation", who hold all the information and who decide to add twenty more years to the waiting period.
There are very very dark forces at work in our government and apparently they go on to this day.

 

http://www.chrisspivey.co.uk/?p=11184

amputee full article with pictures.

 

It matters not if a million, ten million or the overwhelming majority of Americans demand that our government show absolute transparency when events such as these occur, the government has an obligation to protect itself, its interests, our perceived sensibilities and their sources/methods, among other things. In other words, the need and want for secrecy runs deep in our government. It's the same way everywhere. Governments have their reasons, though, I am not condoning the hush-hush cycle, I understand it and am well aware of it, as well, frustrated by it. It makes an adult feel like a child again, you know, how children sometimes get wind of something and are of course naturally curious to know more for various reasons, but their pursuits for the attainment of truth is stifled by their parents sturdy stonewall. The governments of the world do that to adults on a daily basis. Requests for information or the truth about something are summarily denied. People the world over are kept in the dark on a multitude of levels. Most people are too busy to even scoop up the available open-source intelligence that is always and constantly floating all around them. It is both funny and sad at the same time because this conglomeration of information could easily change the person's life, and all it requires is an Internet connection and some free-time. Nevertheless, there will always be this great imbalance. I think governments rely on it, partially for politicians, businessmen and the like having the kind of shelf-life they enjoy having, for if everyone, everywhere, was in tune to the noise these men and women that are supposedly leading us all make, there would be upheavals all the time... or worldwide communism to both crush and crackdown on this new worldly self-enlightenment. At any rate, the more you know about things like this as a nobody private citizen, especially in this day and age when anything can be construed as 'terrorism', it is like having a large neon sign above your head that reads, "Watch me!" But that is redundant, you know, since, at some level, we're all being monitored, recorded and analyzed because we all pretty much use phones, e-mail, the Internet, TV and agree to license agreements without even reading them. If a purge ever happens in America, or the West in general, the government will know who to come afafter