Boom! National Poll: Trump Leading 67% To Hillary’s 19% Of 50,000 Voters

u really dont seem to know what left and right mean in a political context, bernie sanders might have been the first presidential candidate that is left from the middle in the entire history

as virtually every politician in the US, obama and clinton are certainly on the right side of the political spectrum

 

Well the demographics of the LSM, surely isn't representative. Each of those polls are skewed with a heavy side of Democrats and is not equal. At least the poll shown here is random and taken in the 50 states.

 

The other poster " May " have a smidgen of inadequacy in his statement, but your candidate is one big Blemish that will destroy this country as we know it.......

 

protectionism, isolationism, appeasing russia... throwing away decades of american efforts to build an international order.

Have you heard that statistic about how trump averaged on lie every three minutes? i mean seriously, you can't hold truthfulness as something trump is good at. He literally lies all the time. about everything. from accusing obama of being a muslim to denying he sniffed during the debates.

You have to consider that Trump has never been in a position where his decisions can result on people dying. so a direct comparison is pointless.

I imagine that she is not a good campaigner, but better at the actual job. She certainly isn't stupid. moral is another matter, but she is quite evidently a smart person.

dude.. wtf?.. seriously?

She will be more hawk, and being hawk means you are not a pus$y. it means, for example, that you stand up to putin.

it's funny you say that when you praised trump for wanting to bomb isis and take their oil. But no, she wants to solve the problems there, and preferably not with ground troops. that's what she's said about that.

she's the closest things of the two options.

scotus appointments is highly overrated. wait another four years and you can elect a good conservative president who can solve immigration for you. Just don't nominate someone like trump again and lose the election.

Well, gun rights don't matter much, and immigration can be adressed in four years, so I don't care much about that.

 

Do you agree with running trade deficits with CHina and mexico?

What kind of international "order" is that?

No I haven't. BUt I assure you Hillary lies far more than he does. It disgusts me.

Maybe at some things, but I don't consider anyone who is PC to be correct on anything. That is impossible. THe only thing she is smart at is lying to idiots who don't check her record and knowing how to advance her self interests by preying on such people.

Yep.

She is a PC hawk. They are by far the worst. And its not like she is fighting herself. SHe is a politician who sends other people to fight for her. Not really respectable. And I know you are probably going to say the same thing about Trump and yes you would be right. But literally being politically correct with other peoples lives is literally evil and so mean and careless.

How will she stand up to Putin specifically?

I don't know why democrats are making an enemy out of Putin. He has a lot of similar American values for Russia. He is fighting ISIS in the middle east while Obama is funding ISIS in Syria.

What is wrong with that?

Every great military leader uses the enemies resources for his own ends except for politically correct dip(*)(*)(*)(*)s like Bush and CLinton.

 

He has a lot of common sense positions.

It depends on the issue I think.

 

The most accurate and true poll is conducted on Election day. Btw, what is the significance of the word "Boom!" mean in your thread name?

 

Trade deficits are not as important as you think.

IMF, NATO, trade agreements, WTO, world bank, UN... All those things are based on liberal western values and they are primarily maintained by the USA. It is basically an international framework in which all nations, including china and russia, are forced to operate in. If we let russia and china establish alternative systems, we'd lose huge influence.

no, she really does not. I mean, statistically speaking.

Are you sure she is not lying about being PC? I think she is, to a large extent.

yep?? groping women is wrong ffs.

yes, I would say the same thing about Trump, and in addition he is a draft dodger and he mocked PoWs. Plus, he'd start a war over twitter, and that's worse.

increase sanctions, put more pressure on him miltiarily and economically.

similar values?? god.

Well, maybe he is an enemy because he is humiliating the US across the world, working against your intrests everywhere, and even bloody hacking your elections.

it's just funny because you asked if hillary would get you entangled in the middle east. Trump certainly will.

Then you can't criticise hillary for it.

she is and that is not conservative. I do not like it.

Latinos are catholics and very religious. It is amazing that the GOP haven't gotten a solid latino vote. Or i mean, it's not suprising when you nominate someone like trump. But latinos should be easy to win. The old GOP coalition obviously doesn't work anymore, so you need to put together a new one. get working.

 

lol........

 

The only polls that show Trump winning are two are three outliers and online polls that literally let you vote as many times as you want and which Reddit and 4chan users are openly and eagerly abusing for Trump. And the poll is far from "random," by your video's own admission. They artificially inserted equal representation among Republicans, Democrats and Independents. That would get you an F in any basic polling class. That is like asking whether more people would vote for red balloons or blue balloons and then polling people whose favorite color was red and people whose favorite color is blue equally. Your "poll" assumes that Democrats, Republicans will turn out in equal numbers, which is complete nonsense.

Polling Democrats and Republicans equally to find out who will win is idiotic. Poll likely voters without artificially trying to shoehorn political equity. The whole point of an election is that the supporters aren't going to turn out in equal numbers. How is this lost on people? I mean really?

If you want to believe that the race is close, fine, but really? Trump at 67% Hillary at 19%? Who is seriously gullible enough to swallow that Kool Aid?

 

Well... he does have a point here:

Read more at: http://www.brainyquote.com/quotes/authors/d/donald_trump_4.html

 

Have anything I can read? I will appreciate it.

I do believe that you are mistaken though on trade deficits. They are not sustainable.

Those are all garbage organizations that undermine our standing and only cost money except for NATO. The IMF and World Bank just take taxpayer money and give it to third world dictators. The U.N. hates the U.S.

If you always believed in these organizations, I don't think you were a conservative to begin with. No pun intended.

Where did you get this source? Show me please.

Not really. Its wrong if they tell you to stop and you then do it again. Which I don't think DJT did.

I think that's an exaggeration.

What do you mean by put pressure on him militarily?

I don't see why we need another cold war with Putin.

Yes. He defends Christianity in Russia to my knowledge and economically he is following Americas conservative past with taxes unlike most socialist European countries.

He is humiliating Obama and I agree with Putin on that. Obama is arming and funding ISIS in Syria while Putin is fighting the right people by being Pro-Assad.

I didn't

. Those two issues alone should make you think of another candidate.

Yeah but who wants to pander to Latinos and become a third world country? Even Hilary says latinos are poor and needy behind closed doors. While its true Latino are religious on social issues, they are not on fiscal ones which are probably more important. They flock to the democratic party.

I think its pathetic that we have a third world people deciding our elections now.

 

No need. He's always on thin ice here.

 

OMG,

 

Followed in a close second by Hillary.

 

Why make a new framework, when they can turn the current one inside out? See Here

The Chinese very basically have found a way to maintain a Protectionist System, while participating in the Global Economy. It's quite a feat, but one that undermines the United States. As long as the US is the 'main producer' of the Global Economy(basically a seller, rather than a buyer), we will continue to lose out. We have been transitioning from a Developed Country, back to needing to Develop. A unique regression in history IMO.

 

I cannot refer to anything particular no, but I have heard it from Thomas Sowell. I do not remember exactly where.

I'm not saying they're perfect.. But they're better than nothing.

http://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2016/09/2016-donald-trump-fact-check-week-214287

yes really. You can't just go grab people between their legs just like that. christ sake.

WHO KNOWS. Just look at this guy, this idiot. The guy is running for president and he's acting like a complete bloody jackass. Obviously there is something wrong in his head. He could very well be capable of starting wars over twitter. or maybe not. I don't want to find out.

arms race. We can bankrupt them, because they're poor. I'm talking about actual war, that's just stupid.

Neither do I, but it was Putin who started it, and now we gotta finish it or we'll look like pu$$ies. Sad but true. Can't back down now, you'll look weak, and no one likes weakness. That's the only thing I agree with Trump on.

eh, you are not very knowledgeable about the russian economy then. The russian economy can be summed up by just three words: corrupt as (*)(*)(*)(*). You need a bribe to do anything. But don't take my word for it, google "economic freedom index" and look for yourself. russia scores horribly.

Not only Obama, but the whole US. You, collectively, are being made fools out of.

Whining isn't solving any problems. You have many latinos now, even if we just count the legal ones, like it or not. don't curse the darkness, light a candle.

yeah, we need to stand up to china on trade. By which I mean, enforce the current rules. Trump's approach is just stupid. This is why we need a good Us president which can lead the western countries to collectively pressure china.

 

What part of active duty military was unclear? If it comes down to another civil war or other domestic problem which would merit an en masse turnout of the armed citizenry (militia ) the members of the military are still first and foremost citizens. They would divide along ideological lines on any side of the conflict like any other citizen. Sides include but are not limited to: rebels, imperials, anarchists, commies, conscientious objectors, etc.
Active duty means they'd be in possession of their gear in some respects and certainly in place to take more (they're on base). I mean have you never thought of, practically speaking, how a revolution takes place or ever studied them?

 

I think it's fair to say that most people in the military are not extremists, and so they would back the government.

yes, i have thought about how revolutions take place. The USA isn't a banana republic. The state has very good control over the military.

 

Well that prediction didn't wear well.

NEWSWEEK WONDERS: WILL THE REPUBLICAN PARTY RECOVER FROM A TRUMP DEFEAT?

 

Had the election been held back in october, trump would have lost... then came comey

 

Shoulda, coulda, woulda, yadda yadda yadda!

 

Wow how could you possibly have been more wrong with this post eh? I mean first Trump did win and second, the leftists are now pulling people out of their cars and beating them because they voted for trump.
Could you explain how your post above was so fantastically backwards from reality?
Maybe you can clear this up for us.

 

since trump won, we'll never know how violent his supporters would have become if he lost. I'm just saying, based on what some of them said, it was likely they'd be violent. i guess we'll have to wait four years, see if there's the same kind of rethoric, and the gop loses.

 

Do you realize just how insane you guys sound? If trump lost we would have been violent? Based on what the lefts track record of paying people to incite violence?
Newsflash trump didnt lose he won. Secondly it's the lefties pulling people out of their cars and beating people, its the left blocking streets and ambulances here in reality. You have a couple months left...after that these violent protestors will be getting tear gas and rubber bullet reminders when they step out of line. Your days of anarchy are numbered. The nation has spoken, we are sick of leftists.