Yes.....but when did anyone 'trust' any USA Government/Regime? Your Constitution is built on the basis that the citizens never trust their own system of government, hence the 2nd Amendment.
And we all know that with dems all that is needed is the accusation....Remember? After what America witnessed during the Kavanaugh hearings, democrats sure are doing whatever they can to screw the pooch in two weeks....I can't imagine any rational person with two brain cells voting for democrats seeing how they act.
Oh....because you reckon I am too dumb to understand your explanation? You could of course, try explaining, yes?
I could try, but then, it would appear from the evidence, you couldn't understand. You did ask the extremely transparent question, after all. What does a Supreme Court Justice do? A Justice looks at cases brought before the court and applies Constitutional tests to determine if there are Constitutional issues that favor a ruling one way or the other. Outside of that, they have no power to do anything. They don't make law, they rule on the Constitutionality of cases brought before the court. A wanker Senator like Booker can introduce legislation and conspire with other like minded wanker Senators to create laws and policies that have immediate impact on all citizens. They can raise taxes, pass legislation that harm the economy, or create new programs that control major portions of things like healthcare or immigration. No question what poses the greatest threat. It's a wanker Senator.
Judge Have a go at trying to educate this dumb Aussie. What would I know? What does SCOTUS Judge do? Well....if a SCOTUS Judge has the casting judgement....plenty, and if he is in the pocket of the President.....he is extremely powerful. That is exactly why Donald put Bart there. Donald was bringing HIS balance to SCOTUS with his hand picked Captains Choice choir boy (and disgraced) muppett. A wanker Senator (introducing wild card legislation) not having 'casting vote' anywhere is just a pointless number with a great car park close to the first tee. He has a great say on the course paid for by dumb arse sycophants.......but that's it. Bart on SCOTUS has the power to interpret some obscure piece of crap legislation so that wanker Senator gets to keep his perks. *Metaphor*
What would be really cool was if he defended himself by stating that it's not assault between consenting adults and then follow that up with, "But I am not gay!" All that aside, however, I won't become a leftist in this and maintain that the accusation IS the evidence as the Left did with Kavanaugh. I will simply wait as he gets investigated up one side and down the other at the insistence of the leftist loyal mainstream media -- and we will all stop for a giggle over them ever actually treating leftist politicians the same as they treat people Right of Center -- and then watch what happens after that.
Actually they have nothing to worry about because it is not as if the leftist allied Mainstream Media will POUND the fellow and HOUND him and INSIST upon a wide full open and fully funded and open ended investigation into any and all accusations no matter how wild or how blatantly bogus in nature they seem to be. So he's probably safe. Welcome to the United States of America in the 21st Century.
But in truth Ruth Bader -- the U.S. Constitution should not be a model for any new nations -- Ginsburg doesn't have all that much impact any more, even if she IS an utter disgrace.
The accusations are kind of crazy. I don't believe it. Could be, but is there any actual evidence? IF there is no actual evidence this is another nothing burger, like Doc Ford.
Hmm....I wonder if there will be any protests? Anyone carrying signs demanding he resign? #believeAllAccusors
I know a polygraph examiner who can be very helpful for only 10K per question... Yep, Ford's polygraph examiner rec'd 20K for a few hours and only two questions.
Well it's simple really. We need to wait for Dianne Feinstein to out him. Then have senate hearing on just how deep the pole smoking conspiracy goes. Then Spartacus can take to the senate floor denouncing the alleged pole smoking incident as a fabrication. Simple really.
Most victims don’t have a lawyer. Unless you are Dr Ford who had no idea who was paying for the attorney. When Diane Feinstein sends you to an attorney the bill goes to the DNC or Soros.
Actually it now appears that the DNC and Soros are the exact same entity. One does have to admire him for the wisdom of his purchases. Mostly they come cheap.
You mean it's fine when the left considers the accusation to BE the evidence but it would be wrong if the Right were to do it? Is that some sort of law? But still I agree. It would be anti-ethical for the Right to be exactly the same as the Left in this instance. The accusation is NEVER the evidence. There must be proof! So in order to find the proof he needs to be investigated all the way back to his kindergarten year of school and everyone he ever knew MUST be interviewed no matter the expense or investment in time and the nation's news media MUST make this the centerpiece of all their reporting for -- say -- at least the next two weeks. It is vital to establish the truth.
Ford's attorneys were working pro bono. Sometimes it can be confusing for a client in those situations as they still may get "bills" but aren't expected to cover them.