BREAKING: Second accuser brings new allegation of sexual misconduct against Brett Kavanaugh

Did you keep a diary of that time in 1982 you were unsuccessful in raping that sophomore?

 

But she would put it in HER diary, right?

 

has her diary been submitted as evidence?

 

I wasn't born in 1982(92' for the record) and I've never assaulted any woman in my life. I never will. I have that self decency and respect about myself. An assault on a woman is basically admitting you can't get any. And I'm too prideful to do that. Either someone is genuinely attracted to me, or I'm fine floating by my own boat.

 

There are several possibilities, but I doubt Ford has anything substantial except a teary-eyed retelling of her trauma with a drunken 17 year old.

 

That was common at the time and a good possibility.

 

hmmm... now that would be interesting. Kudos to you for bringing in an interesting twist that no one has thought of (at least not that I've seen in these threads). As Max said, it was common at the time for girls to keep diaries. My older sister has diaries from around the mid 70's through the late 80's. She still has them.

 

That "teary-eyed retelling" would go a long way today, especially if written in a teenage hand 30+ years ago.

That said, you can say what you want about how stupid Democrats are. Especially on internet forums like this. One thing comes to mind: Of all the criminal acts allegedly committed by the Clintons, not one accusation has ever stuck. From Whitewater to Benghazi, no criminal charges have ever been leveled that resulted in anything, even when her accusers were Republicans. Not One Criminal Charge.

It's amusing to see Democrats portrayed as bumbling idiots, and I understand how that makes conservatives feel better about themselves. On the other hand, I know a lot of smart Democrats, and by smart I mean smart enough to weigh the good and bad in accusing a SCOTUS nominee. You can focus on 85 year old Feinstein. She's an easy target. But, she aint' pulling the strings, she is the puppet.

There is more to this story. And we will all be witness to it as it unfolds.

Kavanaugh will not be confirmed.

 

That'd be a good guess. Let's wait and see. Maybe Feinstein really does have an October surprise lined up.

Meanwhile, Brett's virginity defense is getting as many laughs as Trump at the UN. Are any Republicans scratching their heads on that one?

 

If there's physical evidence, it could carry the day. If it's just he said/she said, then Brett will be buying a new robe.

 

This whole carnival is exactly why I will never run for anything, even dog catcher.

 

Me neither. My next door neighbor is running for city office, but I don't think I can vote for him. Nice guy, but a bit out there on the rightwing fringe.

 

I’m not laughing

This has been a very humiliating experience for the man and pure leftwing hell for his family

I hope he remembers every minute of it for as long as he sits on the bench

 

Rightwing, Leftwing, it's all the same. I was 15 once, and I've been divorced twice. No way in hell I would put myself through that.

 

You dont need physical evidence.

His defense was "i never heard of such a thing" "i am not capable of doing such a thing" & "I was an innocent boy scout virgin"

Well we know the first & third to be BS: his own friends, his own statements and the people that knew him there al speak of culture of heavy drinking and partys. (something quite normal for someone that age btw)

So the second is BS as well even without the heavy drinking people can do this, sometimes those you elast expect it from. Add heavy drinking until you pass or blackout and I doubt he can even recall what he all did .

What is quite clear he is lying about his time there to paint a better picture of how he behaved at the time.

 

Unfortunately, I think he will. If he is willing to lie in order to become a judge, then he's just the type of low-life cheating scumbag to violate his oath and use his office to seek revenge and attack anyone who disagrees with him. I sincerely hope he isn't appointed since such people are bad for America. It goes against our founding principles.

 

Well, aside from so much hot air, she does have zilch. So a diary would be nice. But even at that, who cares what kids did 36 years ago where nobody was hurt. Leftist idiots get incensed over nothing. It IS nothing. And the real ugliness is within themselves. That's what they are protesting, hating and resisting. It's all show...all bullcrap....all for the want of power. And about as un-american, unjust, and unappealing as ever. Wicked and wounded, the left just stinks to high heaven anymore. You lost. Get over it.

 

Disagreed. This isn't a court nor a poll, it's a Republican controlled committee which will send his nomination to a Republican controlled Senate and he's backed by a Republican President. While it's sad we have a Sexual Predator-in-Chief who is backing a lying Justice-to-be, I also hold the Democrats equally to blame since they too voted for and supported (still support!) a Sexual Predator-in-Chief and his lying wife. It's disgusting.

Those facts aside, Ford could bring a videotape of Brett clumsily and drunkenly groping her and he'd still be nominated since "it was over 30 years ago". IMO, it's not what he did then that matters but that he's lying about it now. Virgin? GMAFB

 

For her discretion, not her services.

 

It would take something rather shoking to get ten or so gopers to tell the theocrats they just wasted 20-30 million just on this guy. Now they could have another of their choosing, but the gop would have to have a good excuse as to .... why.

Personally, I want to get rid of theocrats. They simply detract from fiscal and defense issues. They are wedge issue voters. So, confirming Bluto Blutarsky is fine by me. It'll piss off women.

 

Doing stupid things as a child is normal to an extent and part of growing up is regretting the harm we've done to others out of carelessness, neglect or intent.

While agree two kids at a drinking party which ends up with one groping the other isn't unusual, lying about it over 30 years later is wrong. Even worse if the liar is seeking a job in one of the highest courts in the land.

 

Agreed.

Again, it's no so much about proving that Brett clumsily and drunkenly tried to get into Ford's pants while she'd been drinking too but that he's lying about it now that would bring him down. If there's hard evidence he's lying, he's done.

 

This accuser has zero credibility, just like that Ford Activist woman.

• No evidence.
• No corroboration.
• No witnesses.

But, leftist are alright with ruining a man's family and career with absolutely nothing, because Leftist are authoritarians that put ideology over everything else. This is some real sick crap going on here.

 

She has credibility but little evidence. The fact she's discussed this with others well before Brett's Justice nomination is credible evidence.

Brett's virgin comments shoot down his own credibility.

Why are Republicans and RWers having such a problem with this? They voted for Trump, right? So what if Ford has a video tape of Brett ass ****ing her? It was over 30 years ago, amirite? When did Republicans start giving a damn about a 15 year old's feelings from the 1980s?

 

Well, there's a supermaj of women now who think he's lying, and his lying involves behavior towards women in one way or another. So, given that the gop has sold itself to the theocrats' funding, there's not much they could do to make this better for me. I have little hope the dems can take the Senate, but one has to have hope .... LOL