Buffalo Shooter's Manifesto

Discussion in 'Political Opinions & Beliefs' started by Golem, May 19, 2022.

  1. Grau

    Grau Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Nov 1, 2015
    Messages:
    7,263
    Likes Received:
    3,113
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male

    What about those of us who have alway's treated minorities with generosity, kindness and respect?

    Who comprises the "they" you have in mind?
     
  2. kriman

    kriman Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2018
    Messages:
    21,758
    Likes Received:
    8,575
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    You are guilty of the same thing that the shooter is. The shooter wanted something for his manifesto which would somehow justify what he was doing. One of the things he chose was replacement theory. The fact that it made no sense, did not bother him at all.

    You were looking at some way to blame a republican for what he did. Since he mentioned replacement theory, that was good enough for you. The fact that it made no sense, does not bother you at all.
     
    Buri, popscott and Hotdogr like this.
  3. Golem

    Golem Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Feb 22, 2016
    Messages:
    31,211
    Likes Received:
    12,831
    Trophy Points:
    113
    You claimed I expressed a "non-sequitur", and to supposidly "prove" this, you quote me saying:

    Me: "So deporting was not enough for this shooter. And he goes on a killing spree."

    Do you even know what a non-sequitur is? Because that's not a syllogism. It's not even a conclusion. It's just an observation. If you don't know what it is (and it certainly looks that way), you can still be considered a serious poster if you ASK. I hope this is the case because otherwise, our expectations of considering you a serious poster lay on thin ice. Please don't disappoint us.
     
  4. Golem

    Golem Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Feb 22, 2016
    Messages:
    31,211
    Likes Received:
    12,831
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Only white supremacists.
     
    Grau likes this.
  5. Grau

    Grau Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Nov 1, 2015
    Messages:
    7,263
    Likes Received:
    3,113
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Thank you,
    Would you regard someone who feels that affirmative action is counterproductive a White supremacist?
     
  6. Polydectes

    Polydectes Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 21, 2010
    Messages:
    42,319
    Likes Received:
    12,456
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    They are pawns of their media. Because MSNBC and CNN combined don't have the audience of trucker Carlson he may be an ultra devil Nazi.

    It's jealousy spilling onto people who have no personality of their own. I almost find it sad.
     
  7. Polydectes

    Polydectes Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 21, 2010
    Messages:
    42,319
    Likes Received:
    12,456
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Lizard people, Illuminati, builderburgs, those people that made the frogs gay.

    Lol
     
    Last edited: May 21, 2022
    Buri likes this.
  8. AKS

    AKS Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 20, 2010
    Messages:
    9,631
    Likes Received:
    4,262
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Expected this response from you. Means your post was disingenuous. Color me shocked.
     
    Buri likes this.
  9. garyd

    garyd Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 18, 2012
    Messages:
    48,612
    Likes Received:
    13,092
    Trophy Points:
    113
    So according to Golem we should ignore 179.5 pages out of 180. Typical leftist logic of the oh look at the squirrel sort.
     
  10. garyd

    garyd Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 18, 2012
    Messages:
    48,612
    Likes Received:
    13,092
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Oh and for what it is worth replacement
    theory is indeed racist. How we it is Democrat idea reported by Tucker Carlson. The funny thing is Democrats now want you to believe that it is racist to report on their racism.
     
  11. popscott

    popscott Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 3, 2021
    Messages:
    5,300
    Likes Received:
    3,326
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Exactly...
    "replacement theory" is a Democrat thing... it never has been a Republican issue.... Democrats are doing the "tell a lie often enough it will become truth" Their trying to say it is a republican thing so many times people will believe it... It is their usual MO... keep referencing back to each other to make an issue look legit.

    https://thebluestateconservative.co...ats-and-their-media-great-replacement-theory/
    ooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo
    “[We want] an unrelenting stream of immigration. Non-stop. Non-stop. Folks like me [of] Caucasian European descent, for the first time in 2017 we’ll be in an absolute minority in the United States of America. Absolute minority. Fewer than 50 percent of the people in America, from then on, will be white European stock. That’s not a bad thing. That’s the source of our strength.”
    Joe Biden
    https://archive.org/details/joe-bid...america-thats-a-source-of-our-strength_202101

    oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo

    https://edition.cnn.com/videos/poli...ory-race-immigration-serfaty-dnt-lead-vpx.cnn

    https://www.thewrap.com/seth-meyers-great-replacement-theory-logic-video/

    https://deadline.com/2022/05/chuck-...nt-theory-fox-news-rupert-murdoch-1235026174/

    https://thehill.com/homenews/media/573690-critics-blast-tucker-carlson-over-immigration-remarks/

    https://edition.cnn.com/videos/poli...id-19-tucker-carlson-acosta-holdon-nr-vpx.cnn

    https://int.nyt.com/data/documentto...fox-news-executives/050ee10e2ba61147/full.pdf

    upload_2022-5-21_21-39-4.png
     
    Last edited: May 21, 2022
    Buri likes this.
  12. Golem

    Golem Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Feb 22, 2016
    Messages:
    31,211
    Likes Received:
    12,831
    Trophy Points:
    113
    If they think that it's counter productive because white people are superior, they would be a white supremacist by definition. Otherwise, no.
     
    Grau likes this.
  13. Golem

    Golem Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Feb 22, 2016
    Messages:
    31,211
    Likes Received:
    12,831
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Oh no! You blew it! Claiming that somebody made a "non-sequitur" and then being unable to show what that non-sequitur is, is not something we expect of a serious poster.

    The shortage of right-wing posters who expect to be taken seriously is reaching "baby formula" proportions.
     
  14. 557

    557 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 7, 2018
    Messages:
    12,574
    Likes Received:
    6,224
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Well crapola.


     
  15. Golem

    Golem Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Feb 22, 2016
    Messages:
    31,211
    Likes Received:
    12,831
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I gave up trying to change the culture of the forum. Very characteristic of you that you omitted the part about Einstein and others, where I explain what I meant in THAT thread by "proof".

    BTW, there are so many topics in this forum... even THIS thread has multiple sub-topics.... and the ONLY thing you can comment on is semantics?

    Makes me kinda wonder why I even bother opening your posts.
     
    Last edited: May 22, 2022
  16. 557

    557 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 7, 2018
    Messages:
    12,574
    Likes Received:
    6,224
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Semantics? You chose the words my man.

    I was hoping you would go down this road. Now I get to share the whole OP post of the thread you created and show you contradict yourself in your own OP on this subject. It’s quite obvious you have no idea what you are talking about when you can’t keep your story straight in one post let alone multiple posts. Here is the full post with the very amusing contradictions underlined for emphasis.


    Clearly you can’t be taken seriously any time you reference proof or evidence. You can’t even be consistent yourself in your own OP in your own thread. Why would you expect to change the culture on a subject you contradict yourself on repeatedly?

    I like to remind everyone of a couple truisms from time to time. First, if it wasn’t for double standards, progressives would have no standards at all. Second, progressives are the least self-aware demographic I’ve encountered.

    As to why people without arguments based on logic or evidence keep responding to my posts…probably something to do with the lack of self awareness I referenced above. But as always, I’m thankful when such folks oblige. I’ll never pass up an opportunity to leverage a useful prop.
     
    Buri likes this.
  17. Grau

    Grau Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Nov 1, 2015
    Messages:
    7,263
    Likes Received:
    3,113
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male

    I agree.

    Thanks for clearing that up.

    I think that every racial, ethnic and religious group has its supremacists but for some reason White supremacists generate the most publicity.
     
  18. Golem

    Golem Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Feb 22, 2016
    Messages:
    31,211
    Likes Received:
    12,831
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I did. That thread was purposefully about semantics. This one is NOT. This one is about the white supremacist's manifesto. And looks like you have nothing to say about the topic.
     
  19. 557

    557 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 7, 2018
    Messages:
    12,574
    Likes Received:
    6,224
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Look. You claim things can’t be proven and you claim they must be in the same post. If you can’t make up your own mind on the subject you have no business lecturing others on the subject in this thread. Clearly you have no understanding of the subject.

    As to the “manifesto”, this is what I said about it when someone asked why there was no link to the manifesto on the 14th of May.


    Turns out I was correct. All we have is the edited “versions” someone wants you to see. I’m not foolish enough to comment further on a supposed document nobody can see and can’t be source verified that has selected portions described to us by known liars.

    I’ll leave the pontification on unverifiable out of context spoon fed propaganda to the gullible. Carry on. But I’ll be around to point out your inconsistencies and lack of candor. :)
     
    Buri likes this.

Share This Page