California ammo control lawsuit

Discussion in 'Gun Control' started by OrlandoChuck, Jan 6, 2018.

  1. Vegas giants

    Vegas giants Banned

    Joined:
    Jan 28, 2016
    Messages:
    49,909
    Likes Received:
    5,343
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Uh....you have different information? Please provide it. LOL
     
  2. vman12

    vman12 Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 25, 2015
    Messages:
    66,645
    Likes Received:
    46,476
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Let me just put this to bed so you don't rack up another 10,000 posts of "nuh uh, lol, prove it, lol, show me the evidence, lol".

    I don't care what you think the chance is, I don't care how you came to your 1-2% chance, you have no point, you've contributed nothing to the thread, and I'm not interested in going back and forth in a 3rd grade manner with you.
     
    OrlandoChuck and DoctorWho like this.
  3. Vegas giants

    Vegas giants Banned

    Joined:
    Jan 28, 2016
    Messages:
    49,909
    Likes Received:
    5,343
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Well then let me explain it to you. SCOTUS recieves over 7,000 requests for judicial review and accepts between 75 and 80. So it is a basic math issue. I hope this helps
     
  4. TOG 6

    TOG 6 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 23, 2015
    Messages:
    47,848
    Likes Received:
    19,638
    Trophy Points:
    113
    The board has an ignore function.
     
  5. Vegas giants

    Vegas giants Banned

    Joined:
    Jan 28, 2016
    Messages:
    49,909
    Likes Received:
    5,343
    Trophy Points:
    113
    It sure does
     
  6. vman12

    vman12 Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 25, 2015
    Messages:
    66,645
    Likes Received:
    46,476
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I know, but I don't like to use it.

    Censoring people, even for my own benefit, annoys me even more than useless debate.

    It's easy enough to glide over his posts, as they normally contain nothing that requires thought.
     
  7. TOG 6

    TOG 6 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 23, 2015
    Messages:
    47,848
    Likes Received:
    19,638
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Well, that's true. I see no reason to waste the time, but to each his own,.
     
  8. vman12

    vman12 Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 25, 2015
    Messages:
    66,645
    Likes Received:
    46,476
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I prefer addressing the problem directly. It does take a little more effort but I find it's usually worth it.
     
  9. TOG 6

    TOG 6 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 23, 2015
    Messages:
    47,848
    Likes Received:
    19,638
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Problem with trolls is they aren't interested in honest debate -- as I'm sure you've noticed.
    Thus, you just waste your time.
     
  10. vman12

    vman12 Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 25, 2015
    Messages:
    66,645
    Likes Received:
    46,476
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Well that's why I told him it was a waste of time, now when I ignore his "two word+"LOL"" posts, he'll know why.

    Will it matter, probably not, but like I said, ignoring his lack of content is easy with proper application of the mouse wheel.
     
  11. TOG 6

    TOG 6 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 23, 2015
    Messages:
    47,848
    Likes Received:
    19,638
    Trophy Points:
    113
    If you don't feed the trolls, they go away.
     
  12. vman12

    vman12 Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 25, 2015
    Messages:
    66,645
    Likes Received:
    46,476
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Oh I'm not debating him, I simply told him I'm not interested because there's no debate to be had.

    Some trolls get paid to do what they do, and don't go away.
     
  13. TOG 6

    TOG 6 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 23, 2015
    Messages:
    47,848
    Likes Received:
    19,638
    Trophy Points:
    113
    If they get everyone to ignore them they are of no use to their employer.
     
  14. vman12

    vman12 Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 25, 2015
    Messages:
    66,645
    Likes Received:
    46,476
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Yeah but not everyone will. I can still ignore him, and do most of the time.

    I only responded this time because he tried to engage me, so I figured I'd save everyone from scrolling through 10 pages of constant one liners from him.

    Anyway let's get back to @OrlandoChuck s thread and how we can stomp on Commie California's fascist tendencies.
     
    OrlandoChuck likes this.
  15. TOG 6

    TOG 6 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 23, 2015
    Messages:
    47,848
    Likes Received:
    19,638
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Eventually, it will be struck as no compelling state interest can be shown.
     
    OrlandoChuck and vman12 like this.
  16. Richard The Last

    Richard The Last Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 31, 2017
    Messages:
    3,980
    Likes Received:
    1,376
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Posting a quote from the Giffords Law Center and providing a link to the same does not mean much. Giffords is a gun control organization. If I posted information from the NRA you would take issue.
    Do you have an actual source of the stats provided on the web site? I believe I counted only 102 cases cited in this report yet it mentions 1,230. I guess they got the info on those 102 cases from somewhere. Do you know of a link where I can read about the other 1128?

    I find this part of the report very interesting. Another case of the un-gun crowd twisting information. The report indicates it was last updated December 5th 2017 but not everything was updated.
    The report is correct, in Heller, the Court acknowledged the government’s continuing ability to regulate the possession of guns in sensitive places. It specifically mentions National Parks indicating they would be one of those places. What this report doesn't tell you is that in 2010, less than two years after Heller, Congress approved a law allowing loaded firearms in national parks.
    I understand the main point of the article is the SCOTUS letting lower court rulings stand. I just find it interesting that it doesn't bother to mention that Congress changed the law. How many other things is the Giffords Law Center not bothering to mention to their followers and readers of their web site?
     
    Last edited: Jan 15, 2018
  17. Josephwalker

    Josephwalker Banned

    Joined:
    Nov 25, 2016
    Messages:
    19,954
    Likes Received:
    10,174
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Another good reason not to live in California
     
  18. Turtledude

    Turtledude Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2015
    Messages:
    30,274
    Likes Received:
    20,261
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    and Vegas constantly claims he's not a gun banner yet he is clearly supporting the incremental ammo ban in california
     
    DoctorWho and An Taibhse like this.
  19. Vegas giants

    Vegas giants Banned

    Joined:
    Jan 28, 2016
    Messages:
    49,909
    Likes Received:
    5,343
    Trophy Points:
    113
    You have admitted your gun banning views loud and clear
     
  20. Xenamnes

    Xenamnes Banned

    Joined:
    Mar 3, 2015
    Messages:
    23,895
    Likes Received:
    7,537
    Trophy Points:
    113
    In the same sense that this supposed "ton of evidence" as to the effectiveness of certain firearm-related restrictions has been presented by yourself. That is, not at all.
     
    Turtledude likes this.
  21. Vegas giants

    Vegas giants Banned

    Joined:
    Jan 28, 2016
    Messages:
    49,909
    Likes Received:
    5,343
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Thank you for your opinion
     
  22. Xenamnes

    Xenamnes Banned

    Joined:
    Mar 3, 2015
    Messages:
    23,895
    Likes Received:
    7,537
    Trophy Points:
    113
    It is not opinion, it is fact that has been confirmed, because the work has been invested to actually do such.
     
    DoctorWho and Turtledude like this.
  23. Vegas giants

    Vegas giants Banned

    Joined:
    Jan 28, 2016
    Messages:
    49,909
    Likes Received:
    5,343
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Thank you for your opinion
     
  24. Xenamnes

    Xenamnes Banned

    Joined:
    Mar 3, 2015
    Messages:
    23,895
    Likes Received:
    7,537
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Thus demonstrating that no actual rebuttal is actually possessed, otherwise it would have been presented by now.
     
    Turtledude, 6Gunner and DoctorWho like this.
  25. Vegas giants

    Vegas giants Banned

    Joined:
    Jan 28, 2016
    Messages:
    49,909
    Likes Received:
    5,343
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Ok have a nice day. Lol
     

Share This Page