California appoints illegal immigrant to government position, CNN praises the move

https://edition.cnn.com/2018/03/16/politics/california-undocumented-appointment-trnd/index.html

I got to admit : this surprised even me.

That Cucklifornia was literally a province of Mexico hiring Mexican citizens in government positions to explicitly promote the interests of foreign citizens to get their "rightful" place in the country over Americans, no surprise.

But that CNN would openly endorse that move, I didn't expect that.

Because now CNN openly advocates for breaking the law, since hiring an illegal is explicitly forbidden by law.

"Call to action" is where free speech ends. They clearly just crossed the line.

Just sue this criminal media already.

 

Sue CNN after the illegal alien is deported and whoever appointed her is prosecuted.

 

It's time to send in the Marines and re-take California for the U.S. Talk about collusion with Mexico.

 

What is remarkable to consider, beyond the obvious, is the question of how this illegal alien is going to be paid.

 

Leaving aside the legality, it's a definite fact that California is better at hiring qualified people than Trump is. She looks damn young to have her own law firm while accomplishing all those things. Compare that to Trump who can't get anybody qualified or honest enough to stay in their position for more than a few months.

BTW, the OP and title are clearly delusional. I don't see any "praise" by CNN. The reporter simply does what reporters are supposed to do... report!

You might want to go easy on your Fox wingnut hallucinogenics

 

She even made a Facebook post a couple years ago saying “this is all for Oaxaca a land I miss so much!” (Paraphrasing). She isn’t even hiding that she represents Mexico, not America. And of course the anti American left is happy with this . That shouldn’t have surprised you.

 

Irrelevant to the topic and obvious deflection attempt. Even if Trump were the worst person in the world, this would still be a case of institutional lawbreaking at the state level supported by the media.

And visibly, also by you. Otherwise, will you condemn this appointment?

Wrong. The author clearly frames this appointment as an act of opposition to Trump, and not as a criminal act, which it is.

Since CNN openly endorses opposition to Trump, adequating hiring illegals with opposing Trump means endorsing hiring illegals.

 

The Feds simply need to come in and arrest those willing to violate the law. I think some of these lefty politicians would welcome it. They can brag about how they went to jail for their political beliefs.

Oh, and deport this illegal while they are at it. She says she misses Mexico, let’s reunite her with that POS country she loves so much.

 

I certainly would not. She has the constitutional right to occupy that position, and state authorities have the Constitutional obligation to appoint the best person for the job. She's an American who personifies what this country is about.

But what I was commenting on was the "praise" part. If that's "irrelevant" (as you now say) why was it included in the title itself? As a matter of fact, youi specifically said that the appointment itself was not the issue. You said "no surprise". And then you added

You: "But that CNN would openly endorse that move, I didn't expect that."

What made you change your mind? Let me guess: you realized that it was an absurd point.

I said I wasn't commenting on the legality. The reason is I don't know what law they''re supposed to be breaking and you don't even bother to mention one

The title clearly says "praised". Where is it praised? Show a quote. Where do they "openly endorse it"?

So... since CNN endorses opposition to Trump, then simply reporting about an appointment that you don't like is "praise" or "openly endorsing" it....?

What part of your sphincter did you pull that logic from?