"Call the police" Yea, right.(The sinister twist of the Zimmerman case)

I can't believe there still are people, in this forum think that Zimmerman should "call the police" instead of "taking matters into his own hand".

He did. He MF did. The police did exactly what they did in Sandy Hook Elementary: not being there.

Oh and Aurora, and VT, and Columbine.

Did I mention he is a neighborhood watchman? A strange kid roaming around your property. Yea, nothing should get on your nerve.

If I tell ya a high school girl just bought a used dodge neon using the money she made working at wendy's, then the car got stolen near her friend's house and she was devastated and she started to think she is a fudge-up, how much difference do you think it would make for her to file a report to the police?

Get real man, just get real. Don't have high hopes for the US legal system.

 

What crime had the boy committed at the point Zimmerman decided to take matters into his own hands

 

How about assaulting him?

 

He assaulted him after Zimmerman confronted him. So the question stands what crime had the boy committed at the point Zimmerman decided to confront him

 

Are you saying what I think you are saying?

If I yell "Hey, get back in line and wait, no cuts" at a teenager, then the teenager is justified to get back on me in violent ways?

What about "Get off the streets you bum" and "You are not welcomed here"?

Yea, when you think about it, rape victims are partially guilty in that they shouldn't be that good-looking.

 

I am not saying anything. I am asking a question that you seem very reluctant to answer. What crime had the boy committed before Zimmerman decided to take matters into his own hands

 

These people are pathetic. In thread after thread, they have proven that their "superior" solution to crime is simply to relinquish your right to self-defense, appeal to a higher authority, hope they get there in time, and if not, then surrender, cower, and if necessary, die. What are we? French?

 

Maybe you want to have a go at the question. What crime had the boy committed that led Zimmerman to feel he needed to get involved?

 

defense?? lol. he was the attacker

 

I believe that was all answered in the OP. Zimmerman was neighborhood watch. Martin was suspicious. Zimmerman did his job. Not much else to it.

 

wrong. his job was to report which he did. he was then told to stand down. he didn't.

 

Could you point me to the particular statute thats says looking suspicious is a crime

 

Wrong. You misinterpreted the 911 operator just like all the other anti-Zimmerman people. The operator's exact words were, "We don't need you to do that." He did not say, "Do not do that." HUGE difference. Zimmerman was never given a specific order not to follow.

 

No, we're not going to play this little game. What do you think a neighborhood watchman does? He looks out for suspicious activity. You're also on the verge of building a straw man here since "looking suspicious" is not what got Trayvon Martin killed. Beating the (*)(*)(*)(*) out of George Zimmerman was what got him killed.

 

hahahahahaahahahah! you mustb have dainty fingers to pick those tiny nits!!

 

You're not too bright, are you? Rest assured that Zimmerman's lawyers will use this in court. And it will likely stand up.

 

dream on. and a guy who doesn't understand the added costs of producing things in two sets of units really shouldn't be discussing intelligence. stick to your tv football, its safer foor you

 

Strawman. No crime was claimed or needed. A citizen has the right to follow and confront strangers in his neighborhood. He doesn't need to see a crime or to have some kind of probable cause. If you want you can confront a stranger in your neighborhood too.

 

Try assault and battery. Druggie Trayvon was holding George down....geez, that alone allows someone to defend their self.

 

Martin assaulted him after being followed through the neighborshiood for about 40 minutes. Someone stalks me down the street, and I will just shoot them.

 

OK......So unless it's worded as a direct order, it's not an order........So when my employer has a "Employees, Please Wash Your Hands" sign in the bathroom, I do not need to do it, since it's not a command.

 

I'm curious what you think Zimmerman should have done. Ignore the actual outcome and all the arguments surrounding that. What do you think should be the positive outcome of a neighbourhood watchman suspecting someone who is just walking down a public street?

 

#1 the 9/11 operator is not a police officer and cannot give lawful orders anyways.

#2 you guys are pure stupid

 

So you didn't bother reading the second sentence of the OP?

 

So you are on the side that believes that it is acceptable to attack someone for walking behind you. Luckily not one state has any laws that agree with you.