This is certainly interesting: OK... reducing the inflammatory response certainly does sound logical. Preventing Ebola from being used as a weapon sounds like a good idea as well.
I certainly think so. Crisis on the border: Ebola & horrific child rape Illegals bring intestinal parasites with them, and other diseases long thought eradicated from the United States
Such was discussed previously in the following thread. http://www.politicalforum.com/index...onse-to-the-ebola-crisis-in-the-congo.558905/ The proposal for controlling the risk of an outbreak of ebola is to sterilize the region via firebombing. Read as deployment of whatever degree and/or level of ordnance is deemed necessary to ensure even the bacteria found within the soil does not survive to infect others.
I think that whoever would be in charge of making a decision like that should really take the time to listen to the audio interview that I gave in post number four first...........
At the 5:55 mark in the video Dr. Joseph Ahrens states that the difference between influenza and Ebola... is the INFLAMMATORY response. That idea really grabbed my attention and gives me hope that various viruses may be beaten soon.