Can we have a civil, thoughtful discussion on this?

Such developments will have no effect whatever on the facts that prove geoist land tenure arrangements are better than landowner privilege.

 

Wanting to use resources isn't enough. They need to improve said resources right? That is the way in which atoms are turned into a product of labor isn't it? I thought that is what you said.

What would you call a piece of land that has been stripped off all the natural resources someone could take with them?

 

establish a Nazi govt to kill billions of human beings in order to steal their land and assume that is the only crime they will commit!!

 

yes animals in effect own or control the property they live on. This is a part of the basis for natural law handed down to us through Aristotle & Jefferson. Humans merely formalize the process so property can be bought and sold peacefully according to well know and agreed upon rules which seem natural to most humans except to Nazi and Communist humans.

 

And that's why that isn't going to happen again.

 

Your fantasies are getting old.

 

your inability to respond with substance is well known

 

unless of course the people are Americans who value freedom from libsocialist government. Always nice to take advice from a guy who killed 120 million making him the greatest killer in human history!

 

if you're a Marxist commie why wouldn't you want govt to own all land and all business??

 

I have plenty of substance to offer. I just don't waste it on fantasies.

 

Marx killed no one. Aren't you smart enough to know this?

 

I'm not a "commie" or a communist. I've said what I advocate and you are 180º away from it.

 

I suppose you could say he was too stupid to know that if his thinking caught 100's of million would slowly starve to death. Do you admire HItler as much as Marx? Do you hate Jesus for being the prince of peace?

 

you have pro Marx comments all over your page:


Karl Marx said “Democracy is the road to socialism” because democracy is government of the people, by the people, for the people.

 

Hitler is your guy just like Trump is.

 

Strawless?

 

Right. And you show you don't know Socialism from Communism from Marx. It's all the same to you. And you refuse to learn from someone who knows something about them.

 

Alright Kode - How would your version of Socialism deal with the information problems presented by Hayek?

 

I don't write dissertations on this forum. Got a specific question?

 

I thought my question was fairly specific.

Are you familiar with the information problems that Hayek presented as it pertains to socialism?

 

I'm a retired software developer who advocates socialism, ... not an economist well versed in various capitalist defenses if capitalism. Are you referring to his theory of distribution problems under centralized planning of economies?

 

He's talking about the economic calculation problem.

 

That's what I asked him right above your post.

 

Breaking the question down to a simple form - How do you condense the entirety of the knowledge possessed by the global market into a group of central planners?

Yes - Mises economic calculation problem that was "improved" upon by Hayek.

 

So how would your proposed socialism solve the economic calculation problem?