Child porn found in documents Alex Jones sent to Sandy Hook family lawyers, court filing says

alex jones is masculine, it is the effeminate guys who are usually pedophiles.

 

Bewildering, certainly.
But then again people do bewildering thing
There are nearly innumerable cases where people confess to murders that they provably did not commit

Suspicious?
Over all, if someone wanted to fake the death of their child..., the probably would not do what this guy is alleged to have done... would they?

I mean i have heard lots of fake 911 calls
Off hand, i do not recall one fake 911 call where the faker was laughing about a murder

 

I guess trump can sue

But we were not talking about trump
We were talking about jones and what he did or did not do and on what basis

 

There's nothing wrong with Alex Jones, other than the way he presents himself - which is annoying, or at least to me. I assume he was a radio host because he's over emotional and doesn't seem trained for TV or videos.

 

Yeah, peddling conspiracy theory turds that encourage your cultists to send death threats to grieving families is more than just a "presentation" problem. There is a lot wrong with him -- whether it is a deficiency in sanity or ethics. It has nothing to do with training and everything to do with either mental or ethical deficiency.

 

So you reply to what you consider to be an Ad Hom by launching one at me?

Yes, in fact you either do need to have studied psychology or have assisted people through acute grief. I have done both.

https://www.psychologytoday.com/au/...the-healing-power-laughter-in-death-and-grief

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grief

 

Well, lay it out for us then.

What “truth” is “out” there?

This should be better than an episode of the X files.

 

The Republican War on Public Education doesn't leave any money over for extraneous luxuries like cameras, microphones and video recordings of every corner of every school in the nation.

Therefore your allegation is based upon a FALLACY.

 

So according to you the FBI never bothered to check for viruses and/or malware because they had no interest in finding the originator of the porn is your ludicrous attempt to "prove" that the FBI "considers Jones to be a victim"?

 

Where is your credible evidence to support that load of bovine excrement?

 

Truth is stranger than fiction. I've spent time looking at both sides of the story. It is my opinion that are things that don't add up. That is my opinion. You have yours and I have mine.

 

You would think this, but it's not really true. In fact, there doesn't seem to be any unifying trait among pedophiles that you can point to and say, "Ah ha! That's why!" And as I've noted before, there are actually four classes of pedophiles, none of whom share anything in common except being male: 1) those men who are attracted to children but don't act on it, either out of shame or fear of the law; 2) those men who are attracted to children and do act on it; these are typically the most recidivist of the bunch and the most resistant to treatment; 3) those men who are not attracted to children but take advantage of a situation where a child is available when a woman is not; this bunch is treatable, for the most part, and if there's no child available, will not re-offend; 4) criminals; this bunch abuse children as part of some other crime such as robbery or breaking & entering, and are the most dangerous because they typically kill the child after the abuse. Some serial killers will also sexually molest children before doing away with them. There's a fifth group, but it's hard to call them pedophiles because they typically only get/got one opportunity and they took it, and that's the men who have sex with a pubescent teenager. Most women's first sexual experience was at 13 or 14 with an older man, but those men typically only ever had sex with that one teenager. These are the men who typically end up on sex offender lists, and are ironically the least dangerous of the bunch. Serial offenders get locked up for life, and that life is usually pretty short in prison.

 

Perhaps you should answer your own easily answered questions yourself before you embarrass yourself.

The investigation into it has not been acknowledged, let alone completed by the FBI so I couldn't have an "according to me" in the first place.

https://thehill.com/blogs/blog-brie...s-say-fbi-notified-after-receiving-child-porn

All emails were handed over to the Sandy Hook lawyers as part of the discovery process, including emails that weren't read.

The emails in question had been emailed to JONES....Jones didn't email them to the lawyers. According to the reporting, the emails had not even been opened before.

Jones' lawyer, Norm Pattis, said in an email to The Hill that he spoke to federal prosecutors last week and that there is "no indication anyone at InfoWars knowingly possessed child pornography."

"The items were embedded in emails sent to folks at InfoWars without ever having been opened," he said. "The plaintiffs’s lawyer suggestion that anyone at InfoWars knew child pornography was embedded in emails is risible.”

 

I think they come in all shapes and sizes, sometimes those acting masculine are trying to hide the truth, you never know

heck, I would of thought preachers were safe at one time, but even they can be pedophiles

 

Why did you LEAVE OUT this paragraph?

Which PROVES MY POINT that someone at Infowars was RESPONSIBLE for SENDING those emails to the Sandy Hook legal team in response to the Discovery request.

That they FAILED to even READ the emails that they were SENDING exposes serious PROBLEMS with Jone's CREDIBILITY.

It is SOP for someone working for Jone's legal team to REVIEW the Discovery content BEFORE it is sent to the Sandy Hook team.

Why did that NOT occur in this instance?

There are NO EXCUSES for this happening.

Furthermore you have still FAILED to establish that the FBI "considers Jones to be a victim".

Why is that?

Are you embarrassed by your LUDICROUS FALLACY that the "investigation into it has not been acknowledged, let alone completed by the FBI..."?

Because this is what it says in your own link!

But that is entirely YOUR problem, not mine!

 

Couple things there 'o reading challenged one.

First of all, it clearly says that Jones lawyer said the FBI considered him a victim, and I quoted that part of the story.

Secondly, when one turns over all documents related to an investigation, one doesn't take the time to read through all of them. You dump all data requested at once.

Well, unless you're a Clinton.

Try thinking this time.

 

Ironic on all counts since NOWHERE in the OP link does that FALLACIOUS ALLEGATION of yours appear anywhere at all so next time kindly REFRAIN from PROJECTING your own comprehension challenge onto others.

Secondly only 3rd rate and lower lawyers FAIL to verify what is being provided in the Discovery process where their own client is being SUED and those documents could contain compromising and/or incriminating information.

Obviously you don't know anything at all about how these things work in reality.

Next time try RESEARCHING for yourself before posting bovine excrement that is EASILY DEBUNKED.

 

Yeah. MY reading comprehension and research failure.

Yeah, I'm laughing.



A 3rd rate forum poster would know that depends who they got the documents from, and how long they had to comply.

 

The only "war on education" has been the bipartisan acceptance of the authoritarian Prussian model of "sit down, shut up, and regurgitate what we tell you". Not education, but programming. But as for "luxuries" like cameras and microphones, are you trying to claim that nobody has a phone?

 

I think Alex Jones just wasn't careful enough with his disgusting files and now he's going to play up the conspiracy angle.

 

Could well be - Whats sad is that you can't count out the intelligence community if someone is a "threat" to the elite. It could also be some hacker if the guy has enemies.

That's why evidence is required .. aside from the rule of law of course -innocent until proven guilty.

 

In which case you must be laughing out of EMBARRASSMENT at your own ABYSMAL FAILURE to comprehend that NOWHERE in that article does it stipulate that;

Not finding evidence does NOT equate to the "FBI considered him a victim".

YOU pulled that load of crap out of your nether regions and you are unable to provide any credible substantiation because NOWHERE in the article does is say what you are FALLACIOUSLY alleging about the FBI.

I am not in the least surprised that Jones has an incompetent lawyer and that his abysmal failure to do his due diligence is being defended by those who don't know how Discovery actually works and how any COMPETENT lawyer would know that all they had to do was to request more time to complete the Discovery process.

And I am also not in the least surprised that you are now wallowing in the flame baiting sewer because you are discovering that you have nothing else to support your untenable position.

 

6 year olds had smart phones in 2012 and knew how to make video recordings while they were being gunned down?

 

Oh I see your problem.

I used thought and knowledge of definitions in my response.

You should look up the term for what a person is called when they're harmed by a crime, such as a false allegation of child porn.

Also, I read far more than just the once source. Something that is probably confusing you too.

 

Yes, because one frame of a video is entirely reflective of what his emotional state was.