Clarence Thomas pushing vaccine conspiracy theories

​

Justice Thomas is absolutely right about fetal cells from elective abortions being used in the development of a wide range of vaccines. Not only that, but Thomas is a brilliant legal scholar and SC Justice, far smarter and more ethical than any of the liberal Justices. We're lucky to have that man on the Court during this time America needs him most.

https://www.science.org/content/article/abortion-opponents-protest-covid-19-vaccines-use-fetal-cells
Abortion opponents protest COVID-19 vaccines' use of fetal cells

"Cells derived from elective abortions have been used since the 1960s to manufacture vaccines, including current vaccines against rubella, chickenpox, hepatitis A, and shingles. They have also been used to make approved drugs against diseases including hemophilia, rheumatoid arthritis, and cystic fibrosis. Now, research groups around the world are working to develop more than 130 candidate vaccines against COVID-19, according to the World Health Organization; 10 had entered human trials as of 2 June.


At least five of the candidate COVID-19 vaccines use one of two human fetal cell lines: HEK-293, a kidney cell line widely used in research and industry that comes from a fetus aborted in about 1972; and PER.C6, a proprietary cell line owned by Janssen, a subsidiary of Johnson & Johnson, developed from retinal cells from an 18-week-old fetus aborted in 1985. Both cell lines were developed in the lab of molecular biologist Alex van der Eb at Leiden University. Two of the five vaccines have entered human trials (see table, below).

The Trump administration has restricted the use of human fetal tissue from elective abortions in biomedical research. One year ago, it adopted a policy that forbids researchers at the National Institutes of Health (NIH) from using fetal tissue from elective abortions in their studies. And it imposed an extra layer of review on non-NIH scientists seeking agency funding to do research using such tissue. But the policy did not stop either group from using decades-old fetal cell lines like HEK-293 and PER.C6."​

 

This is a prime example of liberals not giving a rats rip about black people (as well as a liberal's tendency to be racist and bigoted). Any black person who they don't like (or espouses ideas that aren't liberal) is instantly slurred as an "Uncle Tom"... Utterly disgusting... Don't black lives matter??

He was chosen by a President, with the advice and consent of the Senate, as with any SCOTUS justice. How did Ketanji Brown Jackson and her ideological racist ass get on the supreme court??

His claim is correct.

 

I can't like this post enough. Liberals really do need to be held to their own standards, so good job with this!

 

Yes, it was. The whole point of doing what Politico did is to get a fake story out there and get people talking about it, THEN quietly retract it later on, after the damage has already been done.

I demand an apology for such racist rhetoric. BLACK LIVES MATTER!!!!!!!!!!!!

It's interesting that most all of the racism in this world comes directly from leftists... This thread has been QED of that.

 

I'm willing to believe just about anyone over Politico (it is capitalized, btw, as it is a proper noun). I do not accept Politico as a source of anything.

Samuel L. Jackson is a racist as well (and is also a leftist... see the connection yet?). It is a derogatory and racist comment to make no matter what race the person is who says it. I demand an apology from you, some of your fellow liberals in this thread, and from Samuel L. Jackson for your racist rhetoric towards a SCOTUS justice. BLACK LIVES MATTER!!!!!!!!!!

Why do so many liberals hate black people so much??

 

Hence, Politico lied. What was said was accurate. This is why I don't accept Politico as a source of anything.

 

No, Politico outright lied. Lying is second nature for liberals.

... for what crime?

What did he do to women across the country?? I have no idea what you are talking about, and I'm willing to bet that you don't either...

 

Politico retracted the assertion. Please apologize to the forum for posting this garbage. Also, being openly racist reminds one that the Klannishness of the Democratic party and their supporters never actually stopped.

 

Read and view the recent info and link above on the SINISTER FDA... they want covid to live forever.

Sinister and Corrupt Criminals the Govt FDA.

 

The claim is partly correct. The mRNA covid shots and the J&J shot (they are not vaccines) use either HEK 293 or MRC 5 cells in the testing and development. Both of those cell strains originate from an aborted fetus (HEK 293 from an abortion in 1973 in teh Netherlands, MRC 5 aborted in the early 1970s).

The claim is that the fetal cells were used in the production of the medication but did not go into the actual medication injected into people. I'm not sure that is possible. Given all the lies and conflicts of interest from the people involved with covid I don't believe anything they claim.

 

I don't understand the leftist hate. I admire Clarence Thomas.

 

Have you apologized for slandering Clarence Thomas? Its already been pointed out that Thomas did not say what you claim. How quick you are to slander someone who leaves the plantation.

 

No trust in any of them involved in the covid mess, I figured this in March 2020....

 

Added to the above:

And to those who think the Vaccine Approval Process is a months time, forget that, it's years, and it's all
Ignorance on their parts...

 

IMO, Thomas is the single most important addition to the Court in my lifetime. And Joe Biden tried to destroy him for political reasons.

 

No one thinks the approval takes 30 days.

 

I found my new Screensaver..!

 

To be fair to Thomas, a man whom I loathe, I also don't support giving misleading statements (not intentionally, anyway), now, it's not your fault because of the reportage, but the article includes a correction,

CORRECTION: An earlier version of this report misattributed the claim that Covid-19 vaccines were “developed using cell lines derived from aborted children” to Thomas. The headline and article have been updated to directly state that Thomas was referencing petitioners’ claims.