Clinton Funding Chaos In Charlottesville?

Oops ... you failed to calculate those ramifications. You were quick to defend the use of political mercenaries, until you realized that my assertion that Crowd Hire could have stacked the deck with crazies on BOTH sides.

 

Almost a certainty IMO. Soros has scores to settle.

 

What the hell are you even talking about? I never defended political mercenaries, and mocked the idea that the driver was hired. What part of that was confusing?

 

More bad news for Dems Russian witch hunt. Mueller lost his lead FBI investigator, and Assange has said he now intends to prove the DNC wikileaks source wasn't Russia.

 

I didn't see it.

I am worried though that this is going to connect. I have no doubt that these mobs are astroturf. It's going to suck for America if true.

 

I have no doubt that, in the very least, the alt-right mobs were real. I grew up around too much of that stuff to be able to hope it is fake.

 

Crowd Hires advertisements aren't proof?

 

Hell yes they were real, wanted the fight too. They are Neo Nazis, idiots. That was never in doubt.

 

The lady that died from being hit by a car was a local resident of Charlottesville, who had a decent job. The guy that hit her was the nonlocal from Ohio.

 

Again, what part of that do you find confusing?

 

What advertisement? The one in your OP? Read it again and I'll give you 2 guesses what's wrong with it. Hint: use Google maps.

 

Yeah, I'm aware. The questions I have are about who's recruiting these outside agitators, and where the wider responsibilities lie.

 

None of it's confusing. "Perfectly normal" is how you describe outside money, paying outside agitators. Stop running away from your own words.

 

Why? Charlotte vs Charlottesville? I'm aware. I'm also aware the agitators were shuttled into Charlottesville on buses. Where might they have boarded those buses?

 

It isn't normal paying outside agitators to cause riots. It is illegal to do so and anyone who does so deserves to have the book thrown at them. It is normal to donate to organizations you agree with and it is normal for those organizations to protest. Typically, when the right wing makes accusations of "paid protests," the later is all that's happening. As a side note, paid peaceful protesters are perfectly legal, though they shouldn't be treated as "normal" and should be publicly ridiculed. They do not, however, deserve any blame for violence. Again, not sure how any of this is confusing. It should all be common sense.

Have you found the flaw in your second link yet?

 

Bingo! Charlotte NC vs Charlottesville VA. Not the right city. Not even the right state. Why would a PR company hire people for a job in Charlotte and then "bus" THOUSANDS of them 270 miles away? The tinfoil hat was already tight. No need to make a whole suit out of it.

 

Dizzy?

 

Can't answer questions about the logistics. No way of knowing how many were collected at any given location. Might be along a Greyhound route. Irrelevant. They came, and they were paid.

 

What about it is making you dizzy? I'll try to make it simpler:

• Violent protests bad and illegal
• Paid violent protests also bad and illegal
• Paid non-violent protests, bad but not illegal
• Donating to groups and those groups later protesting, not bad or illegal. Completely normal.

Do the bullet points add clarity? Do you still find any of this confusing? Can you honestly say you find anything disagreeable about it?

 

Thank you for admitting you have nothing, only a conclusion that you want so desperately to be true that you are willing to dispense with any attempt to discuss the facts.

You have failed to provide even a sliver of proof for this claim. That's the point. You're frankly feeble argument breaks down to the fact that someone 270 miles away was paid so . . . Soros and Clinton shipped paid Nazis and anti-Nazis to the protest. I've heard lunar landing deniers put more effort and thought into their BS.

 

Hypocrisy bad. Compensation for inciting violence bad. Routine doesn't = "normal" ... or acceptable. Local issue, local residents, local goverment ... so simple.

 

Why won't you answer my question or point out what specifically about it is hypocritical? It shouldn't take more than typing two sentences to accomplish that. I understand why you are avoiding any discussion of proof or evidence, but not why you are avoiding this.

 

You've offered nothing to disprove my assertions. You've tried to pivot on your support for the practice of recruiting temp-to-hire rioters. The DOJ's investigation(s) tell me there's an element of criminality involved in those "normal" practices.

 

Logic 101. You made the assertion. It is up to you to prove it. You have failed to do so. Trumpeting your conspiracy theory as true until it is "disproven" is no different from me claiming that my reptilian alien theory is true until proven false.

I'm not sure if you are outright lying, you haven't read my posts or I haven't made them simple enough for you. Please read post #45 again. It isn't even a long post. I have never defended the legality or the morality of hiring rioters. If you find it necessary to continue lying about that fact in order to defend your conspiracy theory, we are done here.

I have not called any criminal actions "normal." Please stop lying.