If this definition doesn't fit Trump to a tee, then I don't know what does . He's the most unfit person ever to occupy the WH, that's for sure.
The variety and length to which Trump's opposition go to for insults seems not only unlimited but creative. Too bad they can't provide factual performance issues and a legitimate point. I'm sure there is a British slang word to insult people like that too.
Perfect. You might enjoy this, excerpt: Often these criticisms fall out along party lines: In these cases, the politics of the critics, that is, the outcomes they favor, align neatly with their view of the quality of these lawyers’ decisions or the processes they followed in making them. A notable example is the difference in the reactions of Democrats and Republicans to Comey’s unconventional choices in fidelity to his “honest loyalty” ethic. He would infuriate one side of the partisan divide or the other, depending on whether he did what either was certain he should do. The polarized politics of the time eventually also caught up with Robert Mueller. Democrats sharply questioned why he declined to issue a finding on obstruction; Republicans objected that he, in fact, had gone rogue in this or that particular, including his explicit refusal to “exonerate” the president. https://www.lawfareblog.com/rules-and-norms-trump-presidency-risks-and-rewards-playing-it-straight-inside
So you say, then again you folks have said all sorts of things about Trump and proven absolutely none of it. Hard to take you folks seriously, you whine and cry like babies, but prove nothing. When called out on it, you whine and cry about something else and continue to prove nothing...
I like Trump and I also like his policies, cockwomble and all. Maybe it takes a cockwomble to make America great again and also to drain the swamp. But I would prefer we call him Mr. Cockwomble.
