Congratulations, Ron DeSantis. Great Job [rolling eyes]. Moron.

I do. You don’t. No controls are used in meta analysis, literature reviews or systematic reviews.

 

You can not use a study of influenza from 2009 or 2016 as a control in a Covid study. LOL

 

Pull quotes from YOUR LINK are woo woo? LOL

 

I told you I’d be back to correct your misinformation. If you don’t want me to point out your misinformation, stop posting misinformation! Your choice. As long as you keep posting garbage information I’ll keep exposing it for what it is—false.

 

Funny, it was published just a few months ago.
Yet, you’re willing to go with flu trial results long before that. Two faced ?

 

What was?

 

Not anything you’ve read. You’re all over the place.

 

Silly post. You’re way behind. You don’t choose a mask for the general public that are difficult to wear, breath and need frequent expensive replacement.

 

Your link was an article by a MSNBC journalist. It includes many meta analysis, literature reviews and systematic reviews. The individual studies/analysis have publication dates over a 16 month period. What are you claiming was just published?

 

Sorry. The CDC has now taken my position. Finally after they denied science for 18 months.

 

Not quite. You’ll always be alone and behind. Of course you don’t have a reference do you ?

 

More babble.

 

You’re all about braggadocio. You haven’t done anything but make up sht. Now you claim what….. .by the cdc with no reference ?

 

Gave it to you over a week ago. Not interested in repetition.

 

Gave it to you last week. Better get your memory checked. Over and out.

 

It’s your link. Call it babble all you like.

 

Sure you did. Another cop out.

 

http://www.politicalforum.com/index.php?posts/1072930121/

Get that memory checked, friend. It’s going fast.

 

Ha ha.
Kn95 is not n95. They sound like Chinese knock offs. You fell for that ? Where does it say they recommend the n95 for anything but special use.
The n95 is a respirator still only recommended for special use.

“

• BE AWARE: About 60% KN95 respirators in the United States are counterfeit (fake) and DO NOT meet NIOSH requirements.

 

Why selectively edit my post?

 

Who says it has to be linear for my statement to be correct?

 

You’re now on a kick for Chinese knock offs ? Really ?
Read your own reference.
Read all of it. Show me where the n95 is recommended over the cloth and standard masks for anything but special needs.

You’re on this illusional kick that better filtration of virus is always better when it isn’t. You’ve never use one so you don’t have a clue do you ? Do some research and get back to us. The virus is carried on droplets which are effectively filtered by good cloth masks which are washable, easier to wear and MUCH CHEAPER THEN n95. The kn95 is the only one that’s as cheap, and it’s a bogus Chinese knock off of limited value.

You’re now campagning for Chinese Knock offs. Hilarious.

But, you’re smarter then the Mayo Clinic I suppose. The arrogance of your posts is getting wearing.

https://www.mayoclinic.org/diseases-conditions/coronavirus/in-depth/coronavirus-mask/art-20485449

 

Read your own POST. It says that n95 are recommended for “some situations”. It’s not intended for general use. Read what those situations are. NOTHING HAS CHANGED. The n95 is too difficult to use, wear and maintain. And it’s still too expensive where it’s intended to be disposable !

It’s not the kn95. By your own post THERE ARE A PLETHORA OF BETTER CHOICES THEN THE N95. Geesus, you just listed all the better options then the n95 !!!

ITS HILARIOUS. The righties are duped again by the Chinese

 

Who says it has to be an “equation.” A better claim of “direct variation” which may be linear or not seems more appropriate.

 

Nothing in your posts supports the idea that only influenza trials are valid determinants of recommendations in mask wearing. . Influenza test are, were and still being used as control studies. They are not the definitive results. Only those studies that include COVID virus directly are valid. Your limited knowledge is staggering. The original posts and poster is wrong when it falsely used 14 older flu test to conclude something.....we still don’t know what, about covid and mask wearing . You’re both wrong, again and again....