Congratulations, "truthers", You Won!

Discussion in '9/11' started by l4zarus, Dec 28, 2016.

  1. Bob0627

    Bob0627 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2015
    Messages:
    6,294
    Likes Received:
    1,164
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I tried to find something in your rambling post worth responding to but I'm sorry, I couldn't find anything I wish to respond to (except perhaps to address the point below). Try again if you must. I personally would rather discuss 9/11 and other relevant events surrounding 9/11. Your post is nothing of the kind.

    The only thing that would "satisfy" me about that is what I already posted and you quoted. Was there something you didn't understand about it? Perhaps you need to re-read it for comprehension.
     
  2. psikeyhackr

    psikeyhackr Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2009
    Messages:
    1,083
    Likes Received:
    40
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Solid evidence where a 10,000 page government report cannot ask the location of the center of gravity of the top 27 stories of a 110 story skyscraper even though the report admits they tilted "20 to 25 degrees"? LOL

    That so called "conspiracy" only deals with what some people supposedly did before the aircraft impact. It does not explain the physical phenomenon that occurred after the impact. It is really curious that a government capable of putting men on the Moon half-a-century ago cannot handle some skyscraper physics.
     
    Last edited: Mar 12, 2019
  3. yasureoktoo

    yasureoktoo Banned

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2018
    Messages:
    9,809
    Likes Received:
    2,335
    Trophy Points:
    113

    Bob..Bob..Bob..

    There are over 100 eyewitnesses that saw a plane hit the pentagon.
    But those must be shills.
     
    Last edited: Mar 12, 2019
  4. Gamolon

    Gamolon Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2013
    Messages:
    2,380
    Likes Received:
    88
    Trophy Points:
    48
     
  5. Bob0627

    Bob0627 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2015
    Messages:
    6,294
    Likes Received:
    1,164
    Trophy Points:
    113
  6. Bob0627

    Bob0627 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2015
    Messages:
    6,294
    Likes Received:
    1,164
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Kokomojojo likes this.
  7. Gamolon

    Gamolon Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2013
    Messages:
    2,380
    Likes Received:
    88
    Trophy Points:
    48
    There is not one single piece of physical/forensic evidence that proves the EXPLOSIONS were caused by DEMOLITION EXPLOSIVES.

    I don't care how many people used DESCRIPTIONS of what they saw and heard. You, the lawyer's committee, or any other truther do not have one single piece of physical/forensic evidence that shows DEMOLITION EXPLOSIVES were the cause of what was seen and heard.

    Period.
     
    l4zarus likes this.
  8. Gamolon

    Gamolon Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2013
    Messages:
    2,380
    Likes Received:
    88
    Trophy Points:
    48
    You have nothing except what people described they head and saw. Lots of things explode in fires. Lots of things can sound like explosions.There was a fireball that came DOWN an elevator shaft as was described by William Rodriguez. Witnesses smelled "kerosene" all the way down the towers. Witnesses saw planes hit the towers. People saw fire in the towers.
     
  9. Bob0627

    Bob0627 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2015
    Messages:
    6,294
    Likes Received:
    1,164
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Scary, isn’t it?
     
    Last edited: Mar 13, 2019
  10. Gamolon

    Gamolon Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2013
    Messages:
    2,380
    Likes Received:
    88
    Trophy Points:
    48
    What's scary?
     
  11. Bob0627

    Bob0627 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2015
    Messages:
    6,294
    Likes Received:
    1,164
    Trophy Points:
    113
    The grand jury investigation and the facts must be very scary for you, as your posts show your desperation.
     
  12. Gamolon

    Gamolon Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2013
    Messages:
    2,380
    Likes Received:
    88
    Trophy Points:
    48
    What facts Bobby? You call people describing/seeing/hearing EXPLOSIONS as facts that prove DEMOLITION CHARGES were used?!

    :roflol:

    I don't think so.

    There are WAY more facts to support a jet fuel fireball coming down the elevator shaft, just like William Rodriguez described. Even some witnesses in the lawyer's committee document describes fireballs coming from the elevator shaft. people smelled "kerosene" throughout many levels of the towers (including the lower levels).
     
    Last edited: Mar 13, 2019
    l4zarus likes this.
  13. Gamolon

    Gamolon Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2013
    Messages:
    2,380
    Likes Received:
    88
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Nobody is going to accept seeing/hearing EXPLOSIONS as 100% proof of DEMOLITION CHARGES. Not when there are viable options available OTHER than DEMOLITION CHARGES. Such as a jet fuel fireball coming down the elevator shaft. The types of burns like those of David Felipe, the smell of "kerosene" throughout the towers pm many different floors, William Rodriguez describing a fireball coming DOWN the elevator shaft and the sound of "rumblings" (not explosions), the source of the jet fuel fireball from planes witnessed to have impacted the towers, etc.

    What does the lawyer's committee have? Only DESCRIPTIONS of sounds and sights of EXPLOSIONS. Not one piece of physical/forensic evidence of any remnants of DEMOLITION CHARGES, anyone seen placing them, or actually seeing them.
     
    Last edited: Mar 13, 2019
  14. Bob0627

    Bob0627 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2015
    Messages:
    6,294
    Likes Received:
    1,164
    Trophy Points:
    113
    A petition supported by overwhelming evidence. What do you have? Denial and desperation. Your posts are bordering on the psychotic bro. Take it easy before you get a stroke. Odds are nothing will come of this anyway despite the overwhelming evidence.
     
    Last edited: Mar 13, 2019
  15. Gamolon

    Gamolon Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2013
    Messages:
    2,380
    Likes Received:
    88
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Overwhelming evidence of some type of demolition charges being used to bring the buildings down!?

    :roflol:

    Where? show me where in the committee's documents there is any physical/forensic evidence to single out demolition charges as the definite source of the explosions that were heard or seen.

    You can't!

    You keep getting asked to provide this evidence and you never do. Why not Bobby? All you keep saying is that it exists, but cannot show it.
     
    Last edited: Mar 13, 2019
    l4zarus likes this.
  16. l4zarus

    l4zarus Member

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2012
    Messages:
    886
    Likes Received:
    19
    Trophy Points:
    18
    No, that would be the NIST report.

    On the contrary, the physics have all been explained by people who know what they're talking about.(ei. not Steven Jones or Richard Gage). But nice to hear you accept the moonlandings are real and not faked.
     
  17. Gamolon

    Gamolon Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2013
    Messages:
    2,380
    Likes Received:
    88
    Trophy Points:
    48
    How come you or any other truther has not calculated this? The information is out there and can be calculated. If you think it's so important, get off your butt and figure it out. Or have an engineer do it. Why hasn't Gage done this? Or Tony Szamboti?
     
    Last edited: Mar 13, 2019
  18. l4zarus

    l4zarus Member

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2012
    Messages:
    886
    Likes Received:
    19
    Trophy Points:
    18
    What "overwhelming evidence" are you referring to? The Bentham paper? Basile's study?
    Please do not link to Youtube videos.
     
  19. Gamolon

    Gamolon Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2013
    Messages:
    2,380
    Likes Received:
    88
    Trophy Points:
    48
    He keeps getting asked this about demolition charges, but never posts anything. I wonder why?
     
  20. l4zarus

    l4zarus Member

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2012
    Messages:
    886
    Likes Received:
    19
    Trophy Points:
    18
    Imma guessing all he's got are the Bentham Paper(fraud), and the Basile study(another fraud).

    I kinda feel sorry for people still caught up in this crap. Less so when they keep denying what is now right in front of their faces: they got played.
     
  21. Kokomojojo

    Kokomojojo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2009
    Messages:
    14,818
    Likes Received:
    367
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Bob they enjoy being PROVEN WRONG countless times 'yawn'.

    First what they did NOT show you on the news,


    [​IMG]


    If course they will deny explosions despite we can see the demolition wave travel down the tower, and despite we can see the floors being blasted several stories in front of the debris and flaming columns bursting into flames midair.

    BTW Take note of the cutters going off on wtc1 at the same time.


    check this other out too, they are trying to use highly explosive butane and others are using nitrous to make bottle rockets as we can see the **** dosent even have enough power to hurt the 2 liter plastic bottles. Cant even burn it, much less blow it up. as you can see your opponents have no idea what so ever what they are talking about.



    Like everything else on 911 'jet fuel is mysterious and magical' to the OCTers, it travels down 1000ft towers with a single leap and blows every elevator door off along the way roasting people in the basement! Good thing he didnt put magical jet fuel in there because it would have blown his whole upper body clean off. :roll:

    this is WAY TO EASY
     
    Last edited: Mar 15, 2019
    Eleuthera and Bob0627 like this.

Share This Page