"Consent to sex equals consent to pregnancy" - an ethics analysis

Discussion in 'Abortion' started by kazenatsu, Jan 27, 2019.

  1. kazenatsu

    kazenatsu Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    May 15, 2017
    Messages:
    34,665
    Likes Received:
    11,236
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I take it then you don't consider the inside of a uterus to be "in this world".
     
    Last edited: Jan 27, 2019
  2. kazenatsu

    kazenatsu Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    May 15, 2017
    Messages:
    34,665
    Likes Received:
    11,236
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Oh, so it's an individual then... The fetus and mother are one.
    Like conjoined twins.

    Did you see that other thread on the conjoined twin analogy as it relates to abortion?
     
    Last edited: Jan 27, 2019
  3. dairyair

    dairyair Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 20, 2010
    Messages:
    78,908
    Likes Received:
    19,944
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Correct. As the law indicates. Unless the potential future mother says otherwise.
     
  4. dairyair

    dairyair Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 20, 2010
    Messages:
    78,908
    Likes Received:
    19,944
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    yes
    and
    no
    not related, IMO
     
    Last edited: Jan 27, 2019
  5. kazenatsu

    kazenatsu Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    May 15, 2017
    Messages:
    34,665
    Likes Received:
    11,236
    Trophy Points:
    113
    What would you do if the law was ever changed and you couldn't hide behind legal arguments anymore?
     
  6. kazenatsu

    kazenatsu Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    May 15, 2017
    Messages:
    34,665
    Likes Received:
    11,236
    Trophy Points:
    113
    It's only not related if you believe the fetus is a non-person.

    You stated that there is one individual, so if the fetus did exist in the sense of a person, you'd agree the conjoined twin analogy would be appropriate, correct?

    Maybe I was totally misunderstanding you.

    Let's take a look back at the conversation:
     
    Last edited: Jan 28, 2019
  7. dairyair

    dairyair Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 20, 2010
    Messages:
    78,908
    Likes Received:
    19,944
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Follow the law.
    I am not for abortion, but I am for freedom of rights, guaranteed by the constitution.
    I am not female, so I will never be physically affected.
    Are you female? Does the laws of abortion affect you physically?
    You know, you have the choice of carrying or aborting. There is not force one way or the other.
     
  8. kazenatsu

    kazenatsu Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    May 15, 2017
    Messages:
    34,665
    Likes Received:
    11,236
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I know, but abortion isn't in the constitution.
     
  9. dairyair

    dairyair Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 20, 2010
    Messages:
    78,908
    Likes Received:
    19,944
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Are the cojoined twins born and considered human beings by the law?
    And I am no expert on cojoined twins, but I bet there may be special laws for them. But I don't know that for sure.
     
  10. dairyair

    dairyair Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 20, 2010
    Messages:
    78,908
    Likes Received:
    19,944
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    No, it's not. But human rights are. As of now, the unborn only have the rights the mother affords. As I've told you, and I'm sure you've been informed hundreds and hundreds of times.
    You seem to be very very emotional about the lives of others that have no impact on you.

    I noticed the dodge of the rest of my post. Why is that?
     
    Last edited: Jan 28, 2019
  11. kazenatsu

    kazenatsu Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    May 15, 2017
    Messages:
    34,665
    Likes Received:
    11,236
    Trophy Points:
    113
    What do you mean?
     
    Last edited: Jan 28, 2019
  12. kazenatsu

    kazenatsu Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    May 15, 2017
    Messages:
    34,665
    Likes Received:
    11,236
    Trophy Points:
    113
    As Ronald Reagan once quipped: "I've noticed that everyone who is for abortion has already been born"
     
    Last edited: Jan 28, 2019
  13. dairyair

    dairyair Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 20, 2010
    Messages:
    78,908
    Likes Received:
    19,944
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Well, when the unborn quip something, we'll take what they have to say into account.
     
    Last edited: Jan 28, 2019
  14. dairyair

    dairyair Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 20, 2010
    Messages:
    78,908
    Likes Received:
    19,944
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    No idea, quote the entire post. So I can put the post in context.
    To alter quotes is against the TOS. Do you do that often to muddle things up?

    Perhaps its from my edited post, to correct my meaning.
     
    Last edited: Jan 28, 2019
  15. kazenatsu

    kazenatsu Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    May 15, 2017
    Messages:
    34,665
    Likes Received:
    11,236
    Trophy Points:
    113
    If you believe those who don't have a voice don't have rights.
     
    Last edited: Jan 28, 2019
  16. kazenatsu

    kazenatsu Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    May 15, 2017
    Messages:
    34,665
    Likes Received:
    11,236
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I only quoted the relevent parts of your post for clarity.
    If I quoted lots of things that weren't relevant, that would be muddling things up.

    Maybe you'd prefer I modify your text to put the less important parts into a lighter grey color?

    Like this:


    Anyway, the post I quoted of yours was the one right above (posts #35 and #36 ), so it shouldn't have been that difficult. Although I can see how it might have been confusing for you.​
     
    Last edited: Jan 28, 2019
  17. kazenatsu

    kazenatsu Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    May 15, 2017
    Messages:
    34,665
    Likes Received:
    11,236
    Trophy Points:
    113
    So what you're saying is abortion is simultaneously both ethically wrong and right ? Like Schrödinger's cat?
     
    Last edited: Jan 28, 2019
  18. FoxHastings

    FoxHastings Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 29, 2014
    Messages:
    56,891
    Likes Received:
    21,025
    Trophy Points:
    113

    Yes, cherry picking to avoid inconvenient questions can be confusing.
     
  19. FoxHastings

    FoxHastings Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 29, 2014
    Messages:
    56,891
    Likes Received:
    21,025
    Trophy Points:
    113

    It doesn't have to be....there are rights that are not specifically enumerated in the Constitution.

    Do you think NO one should have a right to their own body?

    You don't want the right to your own body?



    You want government or nosy busybodies to control you??? Force you to give up say, body parts, to sustain the life of whomever they choose?
     
  20. FoxHastings

    FoxHastings Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 29, 2014
    Messages:
    56,891
    Likes Received:
    21,025
    Trophy Points:
    113


    No, those who aren't BORN don't have rights.
     
    WillReadmore likes this.
  21. FreshAir

    FreshAir Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Mar 2, 2012
    Messages:
    150,625
    Likes Received:
    63,060
    Trophy Points:
    113
    no one has the right to use another human as a host to keep themselves alive, they can offer their fluids, you can't take them without consent
     
    FoxHastings likes this.
  22. FreshAir

    FreshAir Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Mar 2, 2012
    Messages:
    150,625
    Likes Received:
    63,060
    Trophy Points:
    113
    yes, if it's in my body, I can expel it anytime I want
     
  23. FoxHastings

    FoxHastings Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 29, 2014
    Messages:
    56,891
    Likes Received:
    21,025
    Trophy Points:
    113
    dairyair said: ↑
    Human nature, as well as most every other living creature on earth has sex. It's inbred into the species, including humans.






    NO, that's your skewed interpretation of what was posted. It certainly and definitely wasn't what was posted.


    No, women shouldn't be forced to gestate like livestock.
     
  24. FoxHastings

    FoxHastings Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 29, 2014
    Messages:
    56,891
    Likes Received:
    21,025
    Trophy Points:
    113
    No.....you certainly could NOT be forced to.
     
    FreshAir likes this.
  25. FoxHastings

    FoxHastings Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 29, 2014
    Messages:
    56,891
    Likes Received:
    21,025
    Trophy Points:
    113
    NO, it has NEVER been debunked.



    One's body , and everything in it , belongs to them.

    If your liver doesn't belong to you then I guess anyone can force you to give it to them...right?



    Now here is YET ANOTHER unanswered question:


    If the fetus is not the woman's, whose is it? Yours? The governments?


    WHOSE IS IT ?
     
    FreshAir likes this.

Share This Page