transfusions of young peoples blood is said to help older people live longer, should we be able to force children to give blood if it will extend the lift of others?
Look at the distance you have to reach to make one of the weakest points on the issue. Its still her uterus.
It's not easy to get a life insurance policy on a baby either. That doesn't mean it doesn't still constitute a point.
I found this closing narration in an Outer Limits episode: " Commitment and loyalty are not stuffy issues of the past, but are enduring qualities that raise us above creatures that procreate without compassion or discretion. "
Still no point. Not surprised to see you , again, use fiction to attempt a point. However, "creatures without compassion" does describe those who think women should NOT have a right to their own bodies, should be forced to gestate, should be punished for having sex, should be forced to produce babies with horrible deformities who only face pain and death....Anti-Choicers.
NO, it has NEVER been debunked. One's body , and everything in it , belongs to them. If your liver doesn't belong to you then I guess anyone can force you to give it to them...right? Now here is YET ANOTHER unanswered question: If the fetus is not the woman's, whose is it? Yours? The governments? WHOSE IS IT ? C'mon! Be the first and ONLY Anti-Choicers to EVER answer that question...