Could Feminists(and male suppporters) be Angry because they are ugly?

Back in the 1960's (in US), the upstart of the woman's movement was taking shape.
And I can remember distinctly, being a young teen then, that women were having these "bar burning" demonstrations.

As men became enthralled and cheered them on, they suddenly realized that they had to stop the practice. It as never their intention to make men happy, it was thought up as a way to anger men and it backfired.

right *there*, I realized these women were male-hating bigots.
what I did not know then was they were mostly lesbians. I do *now* LOL - the high princesses of NOW, they're all lezzies.

here is my *opinion* - and I do mean *opinion*,

I think that the majority of women who are active in "women's rights" politics, the gender feminists (whatever that is), the NOW's, whoever,, they were born "male brained" and they know that they can never quite be male.

whatever women say, they know deep inside them they have never quite been up to the standard of their male counterpart and never will be. they don't quite enough testicular fortitude because...

.. . THEY HAVE NO BALLZ

twue, dat

 

WOW, BALLZ!!

AND THEY HAVE NO UTERUS

Let's see you push a baby out of those balls, lol!!

 

All kidding aside, just looking at history - even recent history, "there is a difference".
you cannot expect the two genders to be "the same".

politically correct people just don't see it that way.

they will grow bored some day.

 

Unnattractive females don't get the same luxuries as attractive ones, so they are oppressed.

The capitalists are generous to pretty women, and give them equal rights because they do something for them.

The ugly women suffer in unemployment and low pay, and its not fair, so they must become feminists for equal rights.

 

Lesbians don't have male brains.You're looking a bit ignorant now, aren't you?