Could the Holy Spirit - Holy Ghost = God the Mother?

Let's start this off with a quotation from Leonary Nimoy:

Dr. Chaim Henry Tejman's writings have made me wonder if the masculine thought and behavior patterns may have evolved out of Super Strings and perhaps feminine thought and behavior emerged out of Super Waves or as he terms it..... Super Energetic Matter?

 

Near death experiencer Christian Andreason also felt that our losing touch with the Divine Feminine was playing a role in messing up life on earth.

http://www.allaboutchristian.com/spirituality/

- - - Updated - - -

The masculine and feminine thought and behaviour patterns appear to have a basis in theoretical physics.

http://www.grandunifiedtheory.org.il/gender/g1.htm

 

There is quite a bit of background to this idea over in this other thread that I posted in the Science forum:

http://www.politicalforum.com/scien...ionary-theory-divine-feminine-god-mother.html
Theistic Evolutionary Theory and The Divine Feminine/God The Mother??!!
The masculine and feminine thought and behaviour patterns may have a basis in theoretical physics.

http://www.grandunifiedtheory.org.il/gender/g1.htm

http://www.grandunifiedtheory.org.il/book/life1.htm

 

And this certainly seems to be an example of the humour of G-d in action:

http://www.politicalforum.com/polit...en-may-have-30-more-connections-than-men.html
Corpus callosum in women may have 30% more connections than men!!!!!!

I personally am a guy who is not at all offended by the following statistic....and I am kind of wondering why it would be either surprising or offensive that women may have a significantly larger corpus callosum than we guys do????!!!

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Corpus_callosum&oldid=427333904

 

The idea of G-d the Mother is an important one......
that needs to be looked at in light of new information that is available.

 

I think that some of the new members here may appreciate this topic.

 

I can't go for the mother god thing. Why? Because Christ called the Almighty, father. He called Mary, mother.

 

Messiah Yeshua - Jesus stated clearly that the Ancient of Days the FAther was greater than him..... and was actually doing the miracles through him.

John 14:10

Believest thou not that I am in the Father, and the Fatherin me? the words that I speak unto you I speak not of myself: but the Father that dwelleth in me, he doeth the works."

Jhn 14:16

And I will pray the Father, and he shall give you another Comforter, that he may abide with you for ever;



Jhn 14:26

But the Comforter, which is the Holy Ghost, whom the Father will send in my name, he shall teach you all things, and bring all things to your remembrance, whatsoever I have said unto you.


Jhn 15:26

But when the Comforter is come, whom I will send unto you from the Father, even the Spirit of truth, which proceedeth from the Father, he shall testify of me:

Jhn 16:7

Nevertheless I tell you the truth; It is expedient for you that I go away: for if I go not away, the Comforter will not come unto you; but if I depart, I will send him unto you.

 

Sorry but it is just plain moronic to imagine that if there was a God it would take the guise of a mother or a father. That is just silly humans who can't imagine a superior being that is outside our pathetic self referential concepts.

 

There was once a time that I might have tended to agree with you........

http://www.near-death.com/experiences/notable/christian-andreason.html#a11a

 

All that has alrady been debunked.

 

Obviously to your satisfaction......
but not to mine...... the debunkers seem to be intellectual cowards terrified of the idea that we humans are probably not the most powerful or technologically advanced species in the universe / Multiverse.

 

And.... he called the Holy Spirit / Holy Ghost.....
the Comforter........ and the implications of his statements that the church was better off with The Comforter / the Holy Spirit..... than to have him still there in the flesh....... has major league implications.

 

There is perhaps no way for the human brain to imagine what God is, the qualities, etc. One reason is because God as the creator is probably outside of this universe. He is not of it, but outside of it. So, the brain being inside it, being in time, cannot imagine that which is of a timeless state. But still the human brain wants an image, and the brain creates it, various images depending upon the religion. For that is all that it can do. And it then relates to this self created image. And this is really not different from the graven images god commanded man not to worship. So, perhaps we should never create some mental image of that which we can never ever know here in this universe?

The NDE of Dr. Eben Alexander brought him into the presence of God, in a void, a deep darkness where God was a light exuding love, which permeated the very being of the Dr. God was not a male nor female. But humans can relate to a male or a female better than something which we just cannot understand. At least here, on this plane of existence, in this universe.

The Jews were a pateralistic culture, and so of course their god would be a male. JC carried this tradition forth, referring to god as a father who loved his children. And many christians believe god is a man with white robes and a long beard, and yet, no one is supposed to be able to look upon God with our eyes. We cannot endure what he or it is in these physical bodies. Only in a spiritual body.

 

I have a rather strange theory on the riddle / dark saying of the wise that no man can see the FACE of G-d and live.............

I suspect that G-d is so astonishingly empathetic that when G-d looks directly at the real One Mind or the real Dennis Tate....... G-d....... might appear to us.....................
as us...... except much much much older........... but of course more energetic?!

Exodus 33:20

And he said, Thou canst not see my face: for there shall no man see me, and live.



http://www.politicalforum.com/index...onal-being-in-the-universe-multiverse.368603/

Could God the Father be the most emotional being in the universe/ multiverse?

 

Of course, a decent image of god, if you must create one, is IT is both male and female, a Creator, requiring both. For god being outside of the universe he created, manifested it like a woman giving birth to a new being. We might try to understand it in this manner, since we depend upon images. It is not important what image one has unless it causes you to hurt your fellow man. The image that does allow you to hurt others is not worthy of God.

 

If God is Love then I think love is an emotion, so yes.

Personally Dennis, I think God, Big C Consciousness, is the light of the world, hidden in people, each of us have a fragment of it. If you ever realize this, not intellectually, but on a much deeper level, in the heart, something happens to our ego consciousness. A change happens. And Love can now manifest, even for one's enemies. A much deeper understanding of reality. And I think that the universe we live in is a school which provides the way to this realization, through joy, and through suffering. And eventually we are absorbed back into God. And more than this is just beyond understanding, at least in this meat sack with its limitations. But the goal for each human being is Perfect Love. To be one with God. I cannot prove a bit of it. But nothing wrong with thinking it. And at death, we will find out something, or as atheists believe, there is just nothing. Like turning off a light.

 

No if God was empathetic it might actually be a god. No evidence of empathy whatsoever in the reality of the universe.

 

There is evidence for Karma........
which in a sense is evidence for empathy......
combined with eventual justice.

https://www.near-death.com/reincarnation/research/ian-stevenson.html

 

That is exactly what near death experiencer Christian Andreason reported being shown.

http://www.politicalforum.com/index...reason-is-he-onto-something-important.401732/


The Man on the Throne by Christian Andreason.... is he onto something important?


http://www.allaboutchristian.com/spirituality/

The Man on the Throne

 

Sorry but near death experiences are evidence of nothing except near death experiences.

 

I have difficulty imagining that you are correct on that point.............
How did all those near death experiencers come up with accounts that seem to fit so well with many
of the implications of String Theory......

www.CarbonBias.blogspot.ca/

 

How do all the flying saucer sightings seem to end up so similar.

And near death experiences have no relation to string theory at all. Suggest you actually study string theory instead of reading that babble.

 

http://www.near-death.com/experiences/notable/george-ritchie.html

His Observations of the Temple of Wisdom

 

Even when the near death experiencer experiences a surge in IQ and other mental gifts afterwards?