" Credible "

Discussion in 'Political Opinions & Beliefs' started by Foolardi, Sep 18, 2018.

  1. Foolardi

    Foolardi Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    May 15, 2009
    Messages:
    47,987
    Likes Received:
    6,805
    Trophy Points:
    113
    The country is now being lectured to as far as the word
    " Credible ".What it means and how it applies.
    The word means > able to be believed.Convincing.
    Therefore can a convincing Liar who is trained in the art
    of fibbing be credible.Of course.Most americans are more than
    familiar with this situation.Go to most Used Car lots and experience
    it firsthand.Listen to most Pols { Politicans } and it may be very hard
    to separate truth from fiction.Or How Lies are applied.
    The country is now being weaned as to what is and what may
    not be credible.Yes,a 17 yr. old who is drinking is more than likely to
    do something stupid.Or break the law.To think otherwise is acting like
    a doding mother.Meaning shielding one from actual concern due to
    love and devotion.Or being a Momma bear.
    Which is instrinctual.Or overly protective.
    In the case of Supreme court nominee Brett Kavanaugh who has
    absolutely no skeletons hiding or not in his Life's closet.NONE.
    Not even close.Open and shut case.He's been vetted by the FBI over the
    years since his job descriptions reguire it { Overlooking classified material }.
    Then one day out of the blue { I'm like Judge Judy and don't believe in
    coincidences } his credibility as a prospective Supreme Court nominee
    is not questioned but viscerally attacked.Over something that cannot be
    proven or researched.That 35-36 yrs. ago at a party while in high school he
    was drinking and sexually assaulted a woman.Some woman { a professional }
    pens a letter where she maintaines that her identity must be kept private}
    to a Senior Senator who also happens to be the ranking democrat on the
    Judiciary committee.Both this woman and this senator live and work in
    California.Just a coincidence ? I think not.
    That this woman { Christine Blasey Ford } is a professor at a California
    University { Palo Alto } and also teaches " in consortium " with
    Stanford University { left-leaning University }.This woman also appears to
    be Left-leaning and a big Anti-Trump person.While not teaching or lecturing
    in Left-leaning California this Woman also is active in such things as
    Woman's causes wearing " ***** hats " as identified.This woman is a
    Registered Democrat and has contributed to Democrat Party Campaign
    moves.Not much is known about her contributions because she " coincidentally "
    has managed to wipe clean any of her web info and data.
    Where her list of friends who can attest and make the case for her
    honor & integrity is Nil at this point.Her apparent sexual attacker has tens
    of woman who have come forward this sommer to personally vouche for
    Brett Kavanaugh's character.
    Tens of woman { even those who dated him } Vs. Nary a single woman or
    male willing to vouche for Brett Kavanaugh's attacker { Christine Blasey Ford }
    Just a Credible " coincidence ". I don't Tink so.
    And who be this Woman's attorney.? Another " coincidence " that it be a
    Democratic Campaign donor and Prominent sexual harassment civil
    right's attorney known in the MeToo Movement.Just a coincidence,huh.
    Christine Blasey Ford signed a letter demanding an end to Trump's
    Family Seperations at the Border.
    This supposed Credible accuser signed that Letter with the abbreviated name
    Christine Blasey in which that letter was used in an ACLU lawsuit against
    the Trump Adm.
    Miss Christine Blasey Ph.D Psychologist may be a ringer.
    Her Facebook and LinkedIn page have disappeared.
    This is partly how Stalinism works.Ph.D or no.
    What was once uncredible 30-40 years ago is now incredibly " Credible "
    Say those of The least Credibility.Like a Chuckie Boy Schumer.
    Who mentored Little Anthony Weiner.Aka Carlos Danger.
     
    Last edited: Sep 18, 2018
  2. Surfer Joe

    Surfer Joe Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2008
    Messages:
    24,370
    Likes Received:
    15,492
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Your rant makes no sense, as usual.
     
    rcfoolinca288 and AZ. like this.
  3. Foolardi

    Foolardi Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    May 15, 2009
    Messages:
    47,987
    Likes Received:
    6,805
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Of course it doesn't to those of the sane persuation.
    An honorable person { so demonstrated his entire life }
    with an abject sterling { more like 24 carat gold } character
    is now to be questioned and put under duress because some
    johnny come lately Democrat Activist has the blessing of those
    like a Diane Feinstein and Barbara Boxer.2 well established California
    senior Democrats who live to ply their leftists harm on America's americans.
    No sane person buys this latest Democrat stunt.
    Unless one is to believe those like Teddy Kennedy { Lion of the Senate }
    who had not a peep to say about Bill Clintons many womanizing
    harassing and even Rape accusations while during his Impeachment.
    How does that work.It doesn't.It's a ploy.Like being " Borked "
    or Anita Hilled.
     
    Last edited: Sep 18, 2018
  4. drluggit

    drluggit Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 17, 2016
    Messages:
    31,049
    Likes Received:
    28,514
    Trophy Points:
    113
    The level of collusion that has had to happen to get this woman into the forefront of the national conversation is mind boggling. Think about this. Kavanaugh was a sitting appeals court justice at the time this woman (ford) "remembers" his alleged attack, why wasn't this trotted out then? This woman has actively worked against the president. This woman cannot be bothered with actual specifics. Like where, when, etc. Just the allegation. Screw the 4th amendment, screw rule of law, this is the method of tyranny. The off to the gulag with you crowd. The just because we said so crowd are terrified that their well laid plans for the last 5 or so decades is unraveling under their feet.

    And good riddance.

    All the committee needs to do is ask two questions. Ms Ford.. Where did the incident occur. and Ms Ford. What date did the incident occur.

    She won't answer. Because she has said she doesn't know. If "suddenly" she "remembers", she runs the risk of both a) undercutting the veracity of her previous charges, and b) opens her story up for actual verification which has no chance of corroborating her story.

    Hillary once notoriously said, "wave a $10 bill through a trailer park"... Well, (and it pains me to say) she seems to have been correct. Except, in this case, no $10 bill was actually required.
     
    TheGreatSatan likes this.
  5. Jestsayin

    Jestsayin Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Aug 1, 2016
    Messages:
    16,798
    Likes Received:
    17,571
    Trophy Points:
    113
    The rant as you call it makes perfect sense because whether you are on the left or right it is factual. Because you have a strong bias against Trump points out you are the one making no sense.
     
    TrackerSam and TheGreatSatan like this.
  6. Foolardi

    Foolardi Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    May 15, 2009
    Messages:
    47,987
    Likes Received:
    6,805
    Trophy Points:
    113
    The reasons as to why she is so " vague " is obvious.Ask any professional
    who understands traumatic rape or harassment.Those undergoing true
    rape usually remember stuff like what the place looked like where it occurred.
    That is why this woman " conveniently " both hired an expert Attorney
    specialiazing in sexual harassment and stuff.Because when asked what
    the house looked like inside { did it have doors that lock inside } many
    houses back then did not have door locks.Like Homes in the previous
    era.That used big fat skeleton keys.
    Plus who accompanied her.What girlfriends.Could she pick out the house.
    If not then she's a liar.I'd say she needs to be charged to the highest degree
    of False Rape.
    It's be real easy to find out who lived in that house and whether there was
    such a party.
    It's think it's all made up.By Professionals.That is why this Fraud { Christine }
    like the Stephen King novel/movie has an attorney who knows about this stuff.
    Therefore the reason that an Ex-FBI guy gave her a polygraph.?
    Right There ... Wham Bam ... thank you Ma'am.
    Now when was this polygraph given.That is key.
    And who is this Ex-FBI guy.The same type FBI who Framed the
    Trump campaign.James Comey WILL be indicted ... BTW !
     
  7. Foolardi

    Foolardi Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    May 15, 2009
    Messages:
    47,987
    Likes Received:
    6,805
    Trophy Points:
    113
    In the end this is gonna all make perfect sense.Like the Fact Obama
    Does have a Deep State.And Obama lied about laughing off the idea
    that Trump was spied on.How many of these Obama Deep State
    flacks are guilty and face indictment.
    This woman cannot use the cushy Lois Lerner " I'll take the 5 th "
    pledge.She also should not be granted that her lawyer sit next to her
    and dodge questions.This woman knows it's a huge mistake to go in
    front of Judiciary Committee hearing.
    I already know what's gonna happen.The exact same crap Hillary
    pulled in her Benghazi hearing.Every Democrat spent almost all their
    time Praising her service.
    Or the Peter Strzok hearing.Basically the same democrat approach.
    But we did learn something very important at the Strzok Hearing.
    Dems laughed it off as if " we learned absolutely nothing New ".
    Abject lie.We got official confirmation of who Bruce Orr was, and his role.
    He was the linchpin needed to uncover the true details and sourcing
    of the infamous - Steele Dossier - which was the vehicle used to Frame
    Donald Trump and company.
     
    Last edited: Sep 18, 2018
  8. Texas Republican

    Texas Republican Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2015
    Messages:
    28,121
    Likes Received:
    19,405
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Nothing the woman has said can be corroborated. So there is no credibility.

    Innocent until proven guilty.
     
    TrackerSam and TheGreatSatan like this.
  9. federalist50

    federalist50 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 22, 2016
    Messages:
    887
    Likes Received:
    602
    Trophy Points:
    93
    This reminds me of the Clarence Thomas hearing when Anita Hill came forward at the last minute. When you have a "she said he said situation," I tend to believe the preponderance of the evidence. In another words, what do the vast majority of have know, dated, worked for him or know him say about his character! I believed Clarence Thomas when all of the women who worked for him and were registered democrats stood behind him and praised his character!
     
    TrackerSam likes this.
  10. ImNotOliver

    ImNotOliver Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 29, 2014
    Messages:
    14,692
    Likes Received:
    6,643
    Trophy Points:
    113
    . I liked the part where Kavanaugh denied being at the party, even though no one had specified a specific party.
     
  11. Foolardi

    Foolardi Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    May 15, 2009
    Messages:
    47,987
    Likes Received:
    6,805
    Trophy Points:
    113
    This isn't a " no one " kinda allegation.Just some driven Leftist
    Professor from California who we are gonna find out was put up to this.
    Meaning a plot.Like the - Steele Dossier -.
     
    Last edited: Sep 18, 2018
    TrackerSam likes this.
  12. Foolardi

    Foolardi Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    May 15, 2009
    Messages:
    47,987
    Likes Received:
    6,805
    Trophy Points:
    113

    As of around 3 pm on this Tuesday the Accuser
    Christine Blasey Ford has yet to get back to Chuck
    Grassley as to her appearing on Monday.Grassley's office
    has reached out to her 3 or 4 times by e-mail and she
    has yet to accept the Monday invitation.







    My Original hunch was correct.Christine Blasey Ford has too much to lose
    by opening her can of worms.All it takes is some sharpie of the Judiciary
    to ask a few very key questions and she either can't remember or stated
    something totally different earlier.Like there were 4 Boys at that Party.
    How many Girls.Plus she could also open herself up to Libel and Slander
    prosecution.A civil case for Defamation.
     
  13. Just A Man

    Just A Man Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2009
    Messages:
    12,453
    Likes Received:
    9,449
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Nothing is so evil as to bear false witness against an innocent person. Even if the accusation is true, it is so old and small an act that it is not a dis-qualifier. The republicans need to hold the vote as scheduled and stop letting the evil democrats lead them around by the nose. The democrats fight dirty and the republicans follow the rules. The republicans need to take off the gloves and give it to the democrats -- just like Clarence Thomas did and like Trump does. Wake up republicans and grow a pair.
     
    therooster likes this.
  14. Foolardi

    Foolardi Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    May 15, 2009
    Messages:
    47,987
    Likes Received:
    6,805
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Both Jeff Flake and Maine Senator Susan Collins said they
    need to hear from this woman.Collins is a dependable No Vote
    for the GOP and Flake is a committed Anti-Trumper.
     
  15. Just A Man

    Just A Man Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2009
    Messages:
    12,453
    Likes Received:
    9,449
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Flaky Flake is against anything Trump is for. Good news to hear he is not running again because he knows he can't get re-elected. He is the model for an empty suit. Collins is a liberal democrat who claims to be a republican. The only way she can be relative in D.C. or with the MSM is by voting against the republicans, just like John McCain did.
     
  16. Foolardi

    Foolardi Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    May 15, 2009
    Messages:
    47,987
    Likes Received:
    6,805
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Breaking ... Christine Blasey Ford's lawyer is
    answering for her client that she will not appear Monday
    for an Open Senate Judiciary hearing UNTIL the FBI
    completes an Investigation .

     
  17. 61falcon

    61falcon Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2018
    Messages:
    21,436
    Likes Received:
    12,227
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Meanwhile Kavanaugh prep school buddy Mark Judge penned the article WASTED TALES OF A GEN X DRUNK about his prep school days with his drinking buddy Kavanaugh and how they used to get passing out and puking drunk in their teen years.Lots of drunks don't remember what they did the night before!!
     
  18. Foolardi

    Foolardi Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    May 15, 2009
    Messages:
    47,987
    Likes Received:
    6,805
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Ok ... give the Article { when and where appeared }.
     
    Last edited: Sep 18, 2018
  19. garyd

    garyd Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 18, 2012
    Messages:
    56,996
    Likes Received:
    16,791
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Dude it makes far more since than usual. Let me sort it out for you Miss Blassey-Ford has the credibility of a snake oil salesmen. So say more than a hundred different women (we are coming up on hundreds now not tens) who claim that not only have they never seen or experienced any untoward behavior on the part of Mr Kavanaugh, they have never seen him knee walking falling down drunk. This includes women whom he dated. In other words crying wolf over sexual assault is wearing thin with rational people. It worked with Roy Moore because Mr. Moore was his own worst enemy. It is failing with Judge Kavanaugh because their is zero supporting evidence.
     
    Last edited: Sep 18, 2018
  20. BarleyPopGuy

    BarleyPopGuy Banned

    Joined:
    Jun 10, 2018
    Messages:
    1,566
    Likes Received:
    1,040
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Because what happened over 30 years ago matters.
     
  21. Foolardi

    Foolardi Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    May 15, 2009
    Messages:
    47,987
    Likes Received:
    6,805
    Trophy Points:
    113
    She is already On Record stating she has explained all that
    she knows of the matter.Can't cite a house address or date of the
    Party or who exactly she recalls was there.
    So for the Dems to claim there need be an FBI Investigation is
    laughable.Also the FBI declined the offer to Investigate.
    Kavanaugh has already undergone 6 FBI investigation for his
    career jobs.This is simply a Ploy by the weasely and dishonorable
    Dems to Stall the vote.Plus they are also on record pleading they
    won't even consider voting for Kavanaugh.
    When you have someone like Ruth Bader Ginsberg openly criticizing
    that Mindset,then you know the dems are at rock bottom.
    They just feel compelled to go back to the Obama standard of
    doubling and tripling down on Unamericanism.
     
    garyd likes this.
  22. Foolardi

    Foolardi Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    May 15, 2009
    Messages:
    47,987
    Likes Received:
    6,805
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Where's the ? mark.
     
  23. BarleyPopGuy

    BarleyPopGuy Banned

    Joined:
    Jun 10, 2018
    Messages:
    1,566
    Likes Received:
    1,040
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    It wasn't a question.
     
  24. Foolardi

    Foolardi Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    May 15, 2009
    Messages:
    47,987
    Likes Received:
    6,805
    Trophy Points:
    113
    How about 40 years ago_Or at Birth.Or In the Bathroom.
    Or out on Spring Break.At the beach.
    To err is human to question is :

    " The only interesting answers are those that destroy the questions. "
    -- Susan Sontag { American novelist,critic }
     
  25. Foolardi

    Foolardi Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    May 15, 2009
    Messages:
    47,987
    Likes Received:
    6,805
    Trophy Points:
    113
    At this stage of the Kavnaugh controversy it appears that Jeff Flake
    { Republican member of the Judiciary Committee } is the lone
    sticking point.Saying days ago he was not OK with a Yes vote on
    Kavanaugh until this Woman { Christine Blasey Ford } is heard.
    The Judiciary Committee has to vote on whether or not a
    Kavanaugh Nomination vote goes forward.If Flake votes NO
    in the committee vote and all the Dems do likewise { almost guaranteed }
    then the Kavanaugh Nomination vote cannot happen.
    That is why both Mitch McConnell and even Judiciary Committee
    Chairman Grassley are playing it safe.Because Senator Jeff Flake
    is not only a Never Trumper but appears to hold malice towards
    President Trump.
    As it stands right now McConnell can expect 50 Yay votes for Kavanaugh
    from his GOP with the V.P. { Mike Pence } being the tiebreaker.
    But again Jeff Flake as of last night { after 11 pm } tweeted that
    he expects this woman to honor her YES agreement from a couple days
    as to a Monday hearing.But since then her and her activist Lawyer have
    said NO to a Monday public or private hearing.
     
    Last edited: Sep 19, 2018

Share This Page