This statement: DOES NOT refer to mothers as breeding stock. Do you ever post without lies and distortion?
it most certainly does! You can try to pretend otherwise but anyone with the most limited logical thinking ability understands that is exactly what you said. YOU said that women that have babies are breeding stock.
What was said was that forcing women to have babies is treating them like breeding stock. It reduces them to the status of breeding stock. Only two possible scenarios from your distorting posts: 1. You lie, or 2. you are an extremely poor reader. Most women WANT to have one or two babies regardless of the damage it does to their bodies. Doing something risky when it is your choice is quite different from being forced to do it. Do you get that simple concept?
Not at all, like I said, the word feminazi was coined by a moron to be used by other morons. So a "womanizer" - according to you - affords a derogatory summation aimed at the woman, and none whatsoever to the "womanizer". Perhaps in your world womanizers can frolic and screw around to their heart and dicks content... but O... those "exceptionally gullible" women... those "not smart enough to recognise a player" women... I mean, the poor womanizer... not being seen for what he really is... by those "exceptionally gullible" women. Yes, the women are to blame of course... and not the dickhead irresponsible "womanizers" that are responsible for being irresponsible about sex.
Ah the clueless leftist. They are so difficult to have a rational discussion with. Are you claiming that the term "womanizer" does not denote that women are exceptionally gullible? The fact that the term exists does just that. "Feminists" want to claim that women are just as capable in every way as men are on teh one hand, then claim to be more vulnerable and less intellectually capable by coining terms like "womanizer". Just another example of leftist irrationality and hypocricy.
The fact that "womanizing men" exist says nothing about women's capabilities. If a woman falls for a man who is not sincere, it doesn't mean there is anything lacking in her judgement, since such men can be very convincing. Men actually are quite gullible in dealing with predatory women, haven't you ever heard the old phrase, "There's no fool like an old fool."? Oh, and BTW, most men pursue women lecherously at one time or another. http://www.thefreedictionary.com/womanizer wom·an·ize (wm-nz) v. woman·ized, woman·iz·ing, woman·iz·es v.intr. To pursue women lecherously.
YOU just said in THIS post that you view mothers as breeding stock..>YOUR words, Granny. You can't run from it. You can keep whining but there it is. Having babies reduces women to breeding stock...that is exactly what your second sentence says when you substitute the 'it' and 'them' with the factual activity we are talking about. You think because you are feebly attempting to be subtle, you can get away with it but no, I won't let you. AND no one is being forced to have a baby, all you have to do is close your legs and you won't get pregnant.
Because only an intelligent person would understand that "womanizer" is a term that reflects the gullibility of women, and nothing negative about the man who womanizes... (I'm beginning to understand the workings of the conservative mind)
Those are YOUR WORDS, injest. My words are that being forced to bear children reduces women to breeding stock. You do need to know, dear, that you can get pregnant with your legs closed.
Denote? The term "womanizer" is a term DENOTING and referring to the "womanizer". You know, the one who womanizes. An ENORMOUS deflection here from you. VAST and HUGE. And irrelevant. This is like the misogyny of olden days when every bad thing / every bad character trait a man had, he tried to dump his bad ways onto a woman. You're doing just that now. Breathtaking irresponsibility towards your own gender. You go on and on about women that shouldn't have sex so they won't get pregnant... and look at you here - giving the irresponsible men that screw around a huge pass and blaming their screwing around on the woman. No wonder you're on the abortion threads dumping on women. Your attitude/s towards women is sexist, antiquated, and irrational. Ignorant blind nonsense. Irrationality? I'll tell you what's irrational - you rail against abortions yet you want to protect and talk-up the irresponsible men that screw around and create very many pregnancies. If God were to make the womanizers pregnant... instead of women... I'm sure we wouldn't hear a SINGLE PEEP from you on these abortion threads. YOU are the hypocrite.
another Lib referring to babies as 'parasite'..something Granny claims that they NEVER do... http://www.politicalforum.com/newreply.php?do=newreply&p=4377516 I will wait patiently for my apology, Granny...KTHNX!!
AH, you had to go off the abortion boards to find that quote. BTW, your link doesn't mention anything about parasites. You just cannot help distorting what is said.....the comment was I had not seen anyone BUT YOU call a zef a parasite; it is parasitical or parasitic, but NOT a parasite. You really have to be more careful about reading and quoting, those mistakes make you appear to be a liar.
yes, it does, don't LIE. I posted the actual quote here. YOU need to be careful about reading and quoting, these mistakes make you appear to be a liar. and he said the same thing a page later.
This is YOUR LINK, and it says nothing about parasites whatsoever. I would like to know how you came to get someone's new reply. MONITORS please, can you explain how injest has access to someone's new reply? http://www.politicalforum.com/newreply.php?do=newreply&p=4377516
