Dancing Israelis on 9/11 CONFIRMED to be Mossad Agents!

Discussion in '9/11' started by Conspiracy Herald, Jan 25, 2012.

You are viewing posts in the Conspiracy Theory forum. PF does not allow misinformation. However, please note that posts could occasionally contain content in violation of our policies prior to our staff intervening.

  1. suede

    suede Banned

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2011
    Messages:
    1,718
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I'm sure the respected Jewish newspaper, the Forward, always callously reports rumors that Israeli citizens in the U.S. doing detestable things are agents of the highly controversial Mossad, especially related to an earth shattering event like the 9/11 attacks. Yeah, that makes so much sense. :roll:
     
  2. Hannibal

    Hannibal New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2009
    Messages:
    10,624
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    0
    You didn't answer the question.
     
  3. Patriot911

    Patriot911 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2008
    Messages:
    9,312
    Likes Received:
    40
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Why can't you answer the very simple yes no question presented to you by fangbeer? Do you think people don't notice you running away scared? We do. Anyone too stupid to see it now knows. :lol:
     
  4. Fangbeer

    Fangbeer Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Apr 13, 2011
    Messages:
    10,670
    Likes Received:
    3,709
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Okay then, to clarify:

    1. An unnamed source with former FBI credentials says 2 men were Mossad.
    2. Vincent Cannistraro says the FBI suspected links to Israeli intelligence.
    3. Coverage in a Jewish Newspaper.

    This is your evidence that, for you, confirms that these men were operating as Mossad agents?

    Is there anything else? Now would be the time to add it to the list.
     
  5. suede

    suede Banned

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2011
    Messages:
    1,718
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Not only confirms for me, but for just about every rational person with common sense I show this evidence to thinks they obviously were Mossad, or some kind of Israeli agents, thus making it obvious they had some kind of prior knowledge and they were celebrating for a job well done.

    Job well done. A job well done.
     
  6. Fangbeer

    Fangbeer Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Apr 13, 2011
    Messages:
    10,670
    Likes Received:
    3,709
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Okay great, so those 3 things constitute enough evidence for you to come to a conclusion. Let's look at the three again, shall we?

    The first is an unnamed source who used to work at the FBI. Since we don't know who this person is, we can't check with him to see if he/she was accurately quoted by the various media sources. This would include the Jewish media source unless of course you can show that they used some other source for confirmation. The last source is kind of a stretch because he doesn't say that the men were Mossad. He says it was suspected they were working for Israeli intelligence. To me that's a bit wishy washy but it certainly would help to corroborate other peices of evidence. All in all, it seems like the three items you referenced all rest on the credibility of the unnamed source. How do you know this unnamed source is telling the truth? Why is this FBI source credible, but the FBI source from the Shanksville site is not credible?


    Oh, are you trying to add in a fourth piece of evidence? I'm not sure what flicking cigarette lighters has to do with working for Mossad, but if you can produce these photos I'll certainly take a look.
     
  7. suede

    suede Banned

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2011
    Messages:
    1,718
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I trust the respected Jewish newspaper, the Forward, to not callously post rumors that some of ISRAELI's who were CHEERING when filming the WTC getting attacked where Mossad or other Israeli agents if they really weren't.

    If you don't want to trust a Jewish publication, that is your choice.

    Are you really that dense to think I think ALL in the FBI are corrupt and in on conspiracies? I really hope not.

    Sure, here's the "source" for seeing those pics: http://www.fbi.gov

    Put your money where your mouth is, sorta speak.
     
  8. Patriot911

    Patriot911 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2008
    Messages:
    9,312
    Likes Received:
    40
    Trophy Points:
    0
    In other words, suede gets to pick and choose what he is going to believe based on his own overwhelming bias and not because of any other reason like they are telling the truth. :lol:

    See, most people demand EVIDENCE that someone is lying, not some truther pretending he psychically knows when the FBI is lying and when they are telling the truth.

    I will remember this little piece of douchbaggery and use it whenever you ask for a source or evidence or pictures. :lol: From now on, all you'll get is the high level link. If it is good enough for you to use, it is good enough for you to receive. Very fitting.
     
  9. Fangbeer

    Fangbeer Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Apr 13, 2011
    Messages:
    10,670
    Likes Received:
    3,709
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Their source is the unnamed FBI agent, yes?

    This has nothing to do with what I think, and everything to do with what you think. I have not stated a position on this Mossad thing after all. I simply asked for your evidence and you provided it.

    In the case of this Mossad thing, and in the case of Flight 93's crash, for you, both claims rest in the credibility of a single FBI source. One you believe. One you don't believe. Why is that? Obviously you're making this decision based on some other factor that you haven't yet provided. What could it be?

    So you haven't seen these photographs, you just trust they exist, correct?
     
  10. suede

    suede Banned

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2011
    Messages:
    1,718
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    0
    That's what the media deals with a large part of the time, sources.

    And it's up to you to accept it or not and I don't care if you don't.

    What's the single FBI source for the Flight 93 thing again? Just making sure we are on the same page.

    Logic. Try it sometime.

    Yes, unless you can come up with a rational and logical explanation why the U.S. would make up a story that implicates our "best friend" Israel, the country we spend BILLIONS of dollars on and say we will go to war for them, with the WORST ATTACKS in U.S. history.

    Btw, when should we expect you to call the FBI and ask for these photos like you keep begging us to about Shanksville? Wouldn't want you to be a hypocrite or anything.
     
  11. NAB

    NAB Active Member

    Joined:
    Oct 6, 2009
    Messages:
    1,821
    Likes Received:
    14
    Trophy Points:
    38
  12. Fangbeer

    Fangbeer Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Apr 13, 2011
    Messages:
    10,670
    Likes Received:
    3,709
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Certainly. I just want you to realize that everything seems to be pointing back to this single unnamed FBI source, which you seem to trust.

    Again, this is not about what I accept or don't accept. I have not stated a position on this Mossad thing.

    I'm not exactly sure to be honest. You have yet to post your source for the claim that the FBI claims most of the plane was buried. I've personally seen a source in which an FBI spokesman claims 95% of the plane was recovered. I have to assume you think that is a lie as well.

    The claim that dancing Israelis were Mossad agents is supported by a single FBI source.

    The claim that most of the plane was buried (according to you) is supported by a single unnamed FBI source.

    The Israeli claim you believe. The Flight 93 claim you don't believe. This is not logical.

    Implicates them in what? You've only shown evidence that some of the men were Mossad agents. Do you have evidence of involvement? The FBI said they didn't have such evidence in the stories you posted.

    Yet again, this is about what you believe. You believe these photos exist and you haven't seen them.
     
  13. RtWngaFraud

    RtWngaFraud Banned

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2011
    Messages:
    20,420
    Likes Received:
    106
    Trophy Points:
    0





    Present a photo, versus snappy responses....that's all you have to do. (stand by for snappy response...but no photo).
     
  14. Patriot911

    Patriot911 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2008
    Messages:
    9,312
    Likes Received:
    40
    Trophy Points:
    0
    [​IMG]

    Prepare for the truther denial show!
     
  15. suede

    suede Banned

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2011
    Messages:
    1,718
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    0
    You don't trust the FBI, or Jewish newspapers?

    Oh, so Flight 93 didn't mostly bury?

    Have you seen anywhere close to them collecting that amount?

    So the FBI can only be all corrupt, or none of them corrupt?

    Seriously?

    Please come up with a rational and logical explanation why the U.S. would make up a story that implicates our "best friend" Israel, the country we spend BILLIONS of dollars on and say we will go to war for them, with the WORST ATTACKS in U.S. history.
     
  16. RtWngaFraud

    RtWngaFraud Banned

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2011
    Messages:
    20,420
    Likes Received:
    106
    Trophy Points:
    0

    No others huh? Just a hole, a piece of rusted something placed on top. We're seen this one a thousand times. That's it huh? That's the complete verification that 93 was buried? Yes or no is all that is required.
     
  17. Patriot911

    Patriot911 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2008
    Messages:
    9,312
    Likes Received:
    40
    Trophy Points:
    0
    You asked for one picture. You received one picture. You can't refute the picture no matter what your lamassed claims are. Sucks to be you.
     
  18. RtWngaFraud

    RtWngaFraud Banned

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2011
    Messages:
    20,420
    Likes Received:
    106
    Trophy Points:
    0
    "Sucks to be me". Another insult. :popcorn:
     
  19. suede

    suede Banned

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2011
    Messages:
    1,718
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Apparently "Donors" can get away with it.
     
  20. RtWngaFraud

    RtWngaFraud Banned

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2011
    Messages:
    20,420
    Likes Received:
    106
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Seems to be the case.
     
  21. NAB

    NAB Active Member

    Joined:
    Oct 6, 2009
    Messages:
    1,821
    Likes Received:
    14
    Trophy Points:
    38
    Put down a tarp, there appears to be a reach-around in progress.
     
  22. RtWngaFraud

    RtWngaFraud Banned

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2011
    Messages:
    20,420
    Likes Received:
    106
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Sexual connotations used an an insult. Perfectly acceptable, apparently.
     
  23. NAB

    NAB Active Member

    Joined:
    Oct 6, 2009
    Messages:
    1,821
    Likes Received:
    14
    Trophy Points:
    38
    Only the best for Chinese agents posing as Truthers.
     
  24. RtWngaFraud

    RtWngaFraud Banned

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2011
    Messages:
    20,420
    Likes Received:
    106
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I'm Chinese. I consider that an insult.

    TOS...."address the message...NOT the messenger".
     
  25. NAB

    NAB Active Member

    Joined:
    Oct 6, 2009
    Messages:
    1,821
    Likes Received:
    14
    Trophy Points:
    38
    Of course, you've never called someone a government agent in this forum. Never.....

    TOS indeed.
     

Share This Page