Dems are officially a national disgrace.

I would give that award to Kavanaugh especially his guy-tears and crying and all.

At least Clarence Thomas was dignified throughout his own ordeal the last time the DEMs pulled this stunt.

 

He'll never clear his name, @Smartmouthwoman .

He will live with this the rest of his life same as Thomas has had to.

 

Kind of like at the UN when the assembled delegates and their staffers were laughing at Trump.

 

Is that your opinion? Attack the pic?

 

Wonder if you would feel the same if it was your son or husband being destroyed by vicious lies?

 

Well, I have groped a girl or two in my time so therefore I can never run for Federal public office.

They live in another state so if I want to become the new Gov that might still be ok though.

 

His name will only be clouded by the liars trying to destroy him. Like Clarence Thomas, he'll always be known as a survivor of yet another failed Dem witchhunt.

 

Nothing obvious about how you should prove beyond a reasonable doubt to put somebody in prison and deprive them of liberty, but that it doesn't require that level of certainty of guilt to not offer somebody an important job... really?

 

they aren't smart enough to think that far ahead. all political expedience of the moment all the time. which is why they are constantly having to ignore, deny, derail and deflect from their endless double standards.

 

This isn't politics as usual...this is what depravity democrats are capable of.

 

Actually, you wouldn't have to grope anybody by democratic standards. All that's required is somebody saying you did, and they'll believe it. Wait until the guys start showing up and saying that you had a particularly wide stance in a public restroom, and they recognized you by the nazi tattoo on your penis...

No evidence required, no witnesses, just some guy with a lisp says it happened, and you'll find yourself forced to defend yourself against it nonetheless, and then you're required to defend yourself against absolutely no evidence.

I guess a penis pic might be admitted to congress as proof that you don't have any tattoos of that particular nature on your manhood, but that would turn it from a three ring into a four ring circus.

Democrats don't have a problem with this, and I think this reversal of the roles where anybody on the right who is alleged to have done something is now required to prove their innocence without people on the left speaking out against this is where things might just prove to be the point of no return. We simply can't live with each other. It's now down to sheer hatred of each other, so it's time for the diplomats to be recalled...

 

Sarah "death panels" Palin. Just another republican hack.

 

Really if there is doubt that he did, and there is plenty denying him the job, is the moral equivalent of sending him to jail.

 

No it really isn't. You're going to compare going to jail to not being promoted? Imagine how ridiculous it would be if you were looking to fill a position, and somebody voiced concerns about somebody you're considering promoting to that position from a lower but still prestigious position. Now, it's reasonable to look into those concerns rather than just taking one person's word or not, but they are under no obligation to do so and can make whatever decision they think is safest/best for the company - UNLIKE a criminal trial.

 

rather than abide by 'innocent until proven guilty', the dems have decided to bash the crap out of him, so much so, that the verdict won't matter...

i'll have to remember that the next time on jury duty and the accused belongs to the 'other side'...

 

Yes I am. And it is exactly so. If you let people undermine other people in your company through false innuendo and false accusations you will not long have a functioning company. You check it out if there is anything there you act if there is nothing there and it is clear that accuser is little more than issuing sour grapes my first choice if to lay off the accuser. And you are going to have to have a hell of a lot better story any of these women have produced to get me to even listen in the first place.

 

I only start threads about topics I feel passionate about. Sorry if that bothers you.

 

Wrong is wrong and right is right. Whether being falsely accused costs a man his reputation & livelihood or freedom is immaterial. Both are wrong!

 

TRUTH

 

You'd have to prove they were lying in a court of law, where they will have the presumption of innocence and those accusing them of lying will have the burden of proof. We already have that.

 

Not sure if joking or doesn't understand consent.

 

Thank you very much for defending us!

The only chance for men to be saved from Presumption of Guilt is by the good will of some women. Women are the majority -- and The Will of the Majority is The Law. Men's only hope is that some women will defend men's Presumption of Innocence.

 

In a Democracy the Will of the Majority is the Law.

For a long time African Americans were enslaved and discriminated by the White Majority.

One of the fearful prospects of the last century was the Majority expropriating all capital of rich people.

In USSR, Jews were discriminated by The Majority in 1968 -- 1986.

Now The Majority may impose Presumption of Guilt on all men. Our human rights depend on the Will of the Majority. We hope some women will defend our Presumption of Innocence.

 

I would add that this is not something that women are bringing to the table of the law, but rather just something they hope we buy into.

This is something that women either rail against, or they'll be found wanting when it comes to whether or not they even deserve a vote.

All votes are currently counted as equal, but if girls want that to remain, they need to fight for that equality. They need to step up and be heard, or.... to hell with them and their demands for more idiots like the canadians are currently saddled with. The ability to vote isn't just based on your humanity, but rather your ability to vote for our right to sovereignty.

So far, I've seen precious little evidence that women are all that concerned with national borders and security. I think they're only concerned with men paying for their numerous health care expenses.