Differences between males and femaies

Every one in the thread understands the phenomenon except you.

Obviously if there is an actual injury the play stops. The officials will take care of that. The difference is the way boys react to their teammates' pain and discomfort as play progresses and the way girls do.

 

The "difference" is made up and nonexistent. In either case play stops and then resumes while player is tended to. The girls don't call the game and then all go off to meditation sessions, the boys don't get the players helmet and then have a fight for it on the field

Like most all stereotypes about men and women this is bull. As was said, women have vaginas and men have penises, (unless they are herms and they're really very rare) that is the ONLY difference.
I think some of this bs we're getting about "gender dysphoria" can be traced here. "OMG, my little boy doesn't enjoy torturing small animals. He must be a closet female"

 

Every one in the thread understands the phenomenon except you.

Obviously if there is an actual injury the play stops. The difference is the way boys react to their teammates' injury and the way girls do.

You weren't there. I was.

I also played sports and my teammates didn't gather around to console me when I got hurt. The officials did, of course. Om not talking about breaking a leg or getting beaned in the head by a baseball. But for routine injuries, there's no comparison. Boys have an empathy deficit. Haven't you noticed differences between boys and girls?

 

It depends on the sport. Watch dancers one time, if one trips and falls the other girls are likely mad at her for breaking step and ruining the routine. One ot the girls in the movie "Black Swan" said the most fantastical thing in the movie wasn't the girl becoming a swan but the other girls all gathering around this one who had fallen.

One of the reasons girls are more empathetic is we let the be that way. It's a natural human tendency that we beat out of boys and then wonder why they're neurotic

 

At least you agree they are less empathetic than girls, so I guess that's something. Why you think we beat it out of them, I'm not sure I want to know.

 

The construction of gender roles is societal! They are beginning to blend a lot more. As an example more men are going into nursing because the pay is getting so much better....girls were programmed into certain professions...that is changing. But these changing roles didn’t happen in a vacuum.
I don’t know what you mean by constructivism is bad.
The fact that you think boys wouldn’t do “girl things” If encouraged , just shows you think an infant is already programmed
I wonder why boys who shunned earrings and printed shirts and jewelry and other “girlie” things changed? Do you think biology just changed?
Little toddlers of both genders would enjoy ballet..barishnikoff (sp) and other Russian males would disagree....again
So you can't see the differences between a mama's boy, a boy, a daddy's girl and a girl?
I am so glad you told me boys are not girls and girls are not boys. I had no idea
Why is behaving like a girl bad? Is a girls behaving like a boy bad. We should give them role assignments

 

In a sick mind, I agree.

 

To be called a mamas boys is received derisively..a daddy’s girls is usually met with .....”how sweet “ unless one projects his fantasy

 

That does not even mean anything.

A social construct is something that is constructed through a social interaction. Gender is constructed in the interaction with nature. What is "societal" is real, we always have to act in accordance with reality or we will go bloody mental.

Yes, it is happening because the economy is changing which causes our culture to change. Technological advancements are always the leading factors of cultural change and as social animals, we are always looking to maximise the best possible social outcome. Now our material comforts are maximised to such an extent that women are no longer bound to the household.

And I do not know what you mean by not knowing what I mean by constructivism is bad because I never said anything like that anywhere. I said that I personally regard it as a weak theory and then explained why. I never used the word "bad" anywhere.

Printed T-shirts, earrings and jewelry are fashion, fashion changes, but gender does not change.

"Encouraging" someone to do what they don't want is not "encouragement", it is force and - if pushed far enough - brainwash. If a boy wants do to ballet, sure, encourage him. But, if the boy wants to wrestle in the mud, then let him do so and do not disenourage him from doing what he likes.

Who said there are no male ballet dancers? And yes, it is true that borh girls and boys can enjoy ballet just as much as both can hate it. However, it is more likely that a little girl will be drawn to it than a little boy. It is just how things are.

No...

Well, now you know.

Who said anything about the behaviour of any of the genders being bad? Are you talking to yourself?

 

Thanks for telling me gender doesn’t change....LOL changing styles is socialization!
I have never met a parent who brought a little boy to take ballet lessons.
That’s socialization. I guess it’s just coincidence that parents buy violent dolls for boys and nurturing ones for girls. Guns for boys not girls. Etc.being girlish is taboo, being a Tom boy is cool
You misunderstood when I pointed out what boys do gets more respect, if not, boys would do girls things

 

Yeah, cultural change is indeed socialisation, so what? It is not like you can socialise outside of reality to make the change you dream of. That is just naive and wishful thinking. Socialisation happens within reality and the act of socialising happens with - and is also restricted by - nature; You cannot socialise away hunger to create a man who does not need to eat, can you?

You have never met a parent who took their son to ballet class because very few little boys ask their parents to take them to ballet class. The ones who do are miniscule minorities, social outliers. Very hard to meet.

You keep talking about "socialisation" as if it was a random, controlled phenomenon with an arbitrary definition - It is not!

Parents buy tneir kids what their kids like and kids typically like the toys stereotypical to their gender. Toy stores and toy manufacturers are not dumb, they market guns to boys because boys demand guns and dollies for girls because girls demand dollies. It is not some sort of evil conspiracy of "socialisation".

You misunderstood when I pointed out what boys do gets more respect, if not, boys would do girls things[/QUOTE]
In what corner of universe is being different cool? Tomboys are bullied to death in school by vivious girly-girls in pink dresses and shiny tiaras just as the boy who ju,ps rope with girls and let them paint his nails is bullied by the ball-playing boys.

It has never been cool to be a tomboy. Ever. When I grew up, one of my friend had a sister who was a tomboy. She always wanted to play with us and we allowed her to do so. However, I seriously doubt the other girls welcomed her in their circle. Maybe that was tje reason she wanted to be with us. Or maybe it was just that she liked "boy games" better.

I was bullied by the boys my first two years of elementary school. Probably because I was smaller and weaker than the others. My only friend was a girly girl. She was supercool to me. Of course, playing with a girl made them tease me even more.

What kind of confused upside-down logic made you draw that conclusion? The reasoning does not even make any sense.

 

It's one of the many ways we obviate women's advantages over us. If we didn't all heavily abuse the children of both or our genders the Natural Superiority of Women would show through and men would have a fairly small influence in the world

 

Sorry to hear it.

 

What is wrong with you? Did your wife hit you over the head too many times?

I don't consider women superior in the least. We have different strengths generally, but superior? Speak for yourself.

Show me how many new technologies were invented by women. How many great women scientists compared to men? And don't give me this gender bias crap. Maria Curie won the Nobel Prize in Physics in 1903. Women who could, did, even back then. And speaking as a person who has been driven by innovation my entire life, it wasn't learned. I didn't get it from my parents or anyone else. It was innate. I was driven by my nature, as are most inventors. It is a passion that cannot be denied. And I have NEVER met a woman who has the bug.

 

My wife never hits me. She just says "come to bed dear" and all argument ends.

Read the book. The author is one of the more respected anthropologists in the world. He started the book as a parody and realized half way through it was true.

https://www.amazon.com/Natural-Superiority-Women-5th/dp/076198982Xhttps://www.amazon.com/Natural-Superiority-Women-5th/dp/076198982X

 

Meh. Schoolyards are a matter of pure darwininism; if you are weak you won't survive. I beat up a bully in 3rd grade and everything changed after that.

Women are superior in that men regard them as divine Goddesses who hold the powers of beauty and the might of rejection. Men go to war to protect them, they build temples, statues, they make paintings and write poems and novels about them. Men would do anything to honour a woman. Women know this and can just quietly sit around and twirl their hair.

 

How could you type that with a straight face? I love the sarcasm, though.

 

That makes them objects of our desire, not superior. In fact, I would argue that in some ways, men are more romantic than women. Women generally don't understand the hearts of men. They look at relationships far more objectively. Which isn't news. It used to be straight forward, you had to prove you could take care of a woman before she would marry you; or before her family would allow the marriage. It was ALL about money. In fact the notion of romantic love is a fairly recent development.

However, that is changing. A lot of young men see the writing on the wall and have gone 180 degrees the other direction, and truly do view women as living masturbation machines. They have seen how men are treated in marriage and reject that. So they just get what they want and move on. Just like many women look at what they can get from men. If he can't produce the bucks, she moves on. In fact my own sister told me that she dumped her husband because he didn't make enough money! I about choked. She didn't see this as shallow at all, just practical. They had a beautiful home in an upscale neighborhood, with a pool, a boat, two late-model vehicles, and all the amenities of a nice home. But wasn't good enough for her. I always thought she was shallow but that even rocked my boat. It was so blatant.

But I agree that many men can be brought to their knees by beauty. I am certainly one of them. I'm an old school romantic.

That is one reason I do what I do. Basically, lets cut through the crap and tell me what you want. And in doing so, I end up with the hottest women. What a shock. What makes my approach somewhat unique is that I still require that we have a genuine and rewarding relationship. I don't buy gifts and provide perks for sex. I buy gifts and give perks to someone I care about. I just accept that they will eventually dump me.

 

In two words: B.. S! I don't care what he says. I've known too many women to buy that nonsense. They have strengths and we have strengths. You can't talk about one being superior to the other because we are talking apples and oranges. Are women better at some things than men generally, sure. But there are plenty of traits where men are generally superior to women. That is why men have always run the world, with just a handful of female leaders.

You and Ritter both remind me of someone who spent too much time with women, growing up. Too much influence from mother and not enough from male role models. Your minds have been warped. I had a very strong mother and a weak father, and it took me decades to escape the damage. I once thought like you do. It was all but beaten into our heads by our mothers.

Was this author ever married? What was his personal bias? Tesla was quoted earlier and it turns out he never even had a wife.

 

Allow me to introduce you to Simone.

https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC3KEoMzNz8eYnwBC34RaKCQ

 

There must be more to it than "tell me what you want." Any cuck can do that. You are either very good looking or you make them feel secure somehow, probably with self confidence.

Or maybe you tell them you know me. Is that it?

 

We should not generalize. There is brilliance and talent among both sexes.

There are more male than female scientists and inventors. I think women just have other things on their mind. Some modern inventions, like the bomb and the leaf blower, we'd be better off without. Probably gun powder and the transistor as well.

 

Most you g women don't need men for for their money...they’re now making it themselves ..as far as your sister, I would love to hear her side...maybe she didn’t love him? Maybe there was more you didn’t know? Is she so sure she could find someone richer who would marry her? Sorry that you see that buying gifts and providing perks to get sex. You act as though sex is for men only...

 

So having a strong mother and weak father is damaging? What about a strong father and weak mother?

 

No ..for generations girls were discouraged from science and engineering, and now medical schools are more than half female, did they suddenly like science.?