Dimples, and Diebold, and Russia....OH MY

Discussion in 'Political Opinions & Beliefs' started by FAW, Apr 23, 2018.

  1. FAW

    FAW Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Sep 25, 2008
    Messages:
    13,233
    Likes Received:
    3,930
    Trophy Points:
    113
    In my adult life, the Democrats have lost 3 presidential elections

    2000- Because of dimpled and pregnant chads, the will of the voter was not ascertained. Despite the best efforts of Democrats, they were not allowed to cherry pick specific Democrat counties in order to further ascertain the will of THEIR voters. Despite the fact that at no point during any of the recounts, did they lead in Florida, the Democrats shrilly cried that they were the actual winner. Cries rang out from sea to sea from angry Democrats that we need to switch to a digital voting system, so that the real intent of their voters can be ascertained. The Democrats didnt REALLY lose, it was wrongfully stolen.

    2004- The very voting machines that Democrats demanded as a result of not being able to ascertain the will of their voters in 2000, were blamed for rigging the election and falsely stealing it from John Kerry, the rightful winner. All that is needed for proof of this assertion is that the exit polling in Ohio differed from the exit poll statistical sampling, because we all know that statistical sampling is NEVER wrong. The Democrats didnt REALLY lose, it was wrongfully stolen

    2016- The Democrats didnt lose. Russia stole the election for Trump. They did so because a couple million dollars was spent by Russia to put out false information. It doesnt matter that there was $6.5 billion spent to win hearts and minds in this election, what matters is that $2 million and it is irrelevant that at least part of that $2 million was spent on pro Hillary outreach. The fact that the $2 million only represents about 1/3000 of the total amount of money spent, this is what made the difference in an election that electorally, wasnt even close. Apparently, while every Democracy expert in the United States was convinced that Hillary was going to win, The Russians being so much better at electoral politics were able to achieve the unthinkable with such a small ad buy. Undoubtedly going forward, we need to get our campaign managers out of Russia because lets face it, they know how to get a lot of bang for their buck. At any rate, ONCE AGAIN, the Democrats didnt REALLY lose, it was wrongfully stolen.


    Does anyone see a pattern?....hmmm
     
  2. Lee Atwater

    Lee Atwater Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Nov 15, 2017
    Messages:
    45,662
    Likes Received:
    26,746
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Yes. In 2000 and 2016 the Dem candidate won the popular vote. In 2004, Karl Rove use of social wedge issues and the Swift Boat Liars helped secure a victory greatly aided by Bush being advantaged by the US being at war.

    https://www.swarthmore.edu/writing/a-supremely-bad-decision-majority-ruling-bush-v-gore
     
    Lesh likes this.
  3. FAW

    FAW Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Sep 25, 2008
    Messages:
    13,233
    Likes Received:
    3,930
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Yes, Democrats never lose (At least according to the vocal, shrill far left). We get it. Come hell or high water, they will find a way to claim that they were robbed. The only thing surprising is that you dont understand why people summarily dismiss your all too predictable claims. It is as if you never learned the lessons from "The Boy Who Cried Wolf".
     
    Last edited: Apr 23, 2018
  4. Lee Atwater

    Lee Atwater Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Nov 15, 2017
    Messages:
    45,662
    Likes Received:
    26,746
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Predictable claims? Are you saying you believe the Orange Fraud that if it wasn't for all those fraudulent votes he would have won the popular vote?

    Judge finds Kansas' Kris Kobach in contempt of court

    https://www.reuters.com/article/us-...ris-kobach-in-contempt-of-court-idUSKBN1HQ0AX
     
    Last edited: Apr 23, 2018
  5. FAW

    FAW Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Sep 25, 2008
    Messages:
    13,233
    Likes Received:
    3,930
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Hmm....wow. I said nothing of the sort. It does sound though that you are desperately trying to change the subject. I wonder why?
     
    Last edited: Apr 23, 2018
  6. FAW

    FAW Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Sep 25, 2008
    Messages:
    13,233
    Likes Received:
    3,930
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I wonder what the excuse will be in 2020?
     

Share This Page