Do most people agree on ACGCC ?

What is about about "no freeloading" that you find so baffling?

We get it. You really, really want to freeload. But no, we still won't allow you to freeload. You're reaping the benefits of civilization, so you're expected to join in and pay to keep it up.

 

You're impotent. There's nothing you can do without us. There's simply too few of you. We don't believe you. We don't believe that you believe you. We're not playing along. We are going to call your bluff. We are not going to do any of the things that you say must be done to save the planet.

When is eco-doomsday? 10 years, 20 years, 100 years ?
When can I expect a mass exodus from Martha's Vineyard?
When can I swoop in and buy beachfront property for pennies on the dollar as woke people sell-off ahead of rising sea level?

 

Eco-doomsayers are perfectly willing to let the world burn if they cannot compel the few remaining climate denying hold outs to do what they say must be done to save the planet.

We are going to call their bluff because we are not going to do even the absolute minimum of what they say must be done to save the planet. We'll see their doomsday predictions come and go.

The ONLY thing that eco-doomsayers agree on is that the solutions must be compulsory.

 

So you're bragging about your ability to freeload due to the power of your corrupt political cult? Interesting defense.

In the thread that you bailed on, I asked you for examples of hard data that could disprpve your beliefs. You didn't respond. That's because there literally is no hard data that could disprove your beliefs. Religious beliefs can't be disproved with data, and your beliefs, including your belief in your divine right to freeload, are purely religious.

As your cult has been predicting doomsday constantly for 40+ years running now, it's your responsibility to answer that. We normal people don't know what doomsday cultists believe.

Why do you think that current real estate values disprove long term sea level rise? That's just dumb. But then, it is just one of the mindless talking points that you use as a deflection from the hard data.

 

We are going to do things my way not yours. Deal with it.

 

That is the point. Religious fanatics believe they have a divine mandate to force everyone else to obey their holy edicts, as you just announced there.

Thank you for confirming my point. If I need any more of my points proven conclusively, I'll be in touch.

 

Yes. That is exactly the point. Global Warming religionists want to force their holy edicts upon all of us.

If that cult truly believes, why aren't they practicing their religion?

Why does their religion demand that they only try to force others to comply?

 

Aren't you then "forcing" the 20,000 children who die from respiratory failure each year to breath the polluted air of your decision. It's not a zero sum
game. Your "choices" also negatively impact other human beings.

 

We are being quite scientific indeed. We are going to test your theory. We are not going to do any of the things that you say must be done to save the planet. None of it! That's the ultimate test. If you're right, we'll have eco-doom. If you're wrong, you'll just keep on saying that it's yet to come.

We're running the experiment. We're calling your bluff. We will see. One way or the other, we're not going to do what you say must be done, so we will see.

 

Oh, the drama!

Support your statements please. I highly doubt that the children who died from respiratory failure that you claim, can pinpoint it to polluted air.
Remember the 20,000 children that died from diesel fumes because of Volkswagen's cheating on omissions?

Believing one can change a natural cycle, possibly exacerbated by man, by taxing it, is not a rational train of thought.

 

You're quite flippant about possibly killing many millions. There's a strong streak of psychopathy among deniers. The weird thing is that most claim to be Christian, yet they seem unconcerned about the warm afterlife that they're heading for.

You seen confused. The reason that we on the rational side have so much credibility because we earned it by getting all the predictions correct. We've never had a prediction fail before in regards to climate science. In stark contrast, your cult has failed every single time with its nonstop predictions of imminent cooling. That's why you're world laughingstocks.

 

If you are a 97% majority, why do you choose to do nothing unless you can compel the remaining 3% to do something?
Are you really willing to do nothing voluntarily, and let the world burn, if you cannot compel the few remaining climate denying hold outs to do what you claim you're eager to do?

 

Why do you keep telling that lie?

Please tell everyone the sad story of what you've been compelled to do. Be specific. Methinks you just like being a professional victim.

 

Nothing, that's my point. We're not going to do anything that you say must be done to save the planet. We're calling your bluff. When exactly is that eco-doomsday scheduled? I've read so many, most have come and gone; what's the latest?

 

except we, including you, are and will continue doing the things that need done to save the planet. Were you under the false impression that you can dump toxic chemicals into the nearest creek to your home?