Do you believe 9/11 was an inside job and why?

Discussion in '9/11' started by LiberalHypocrisy, Apr 22, 2014.

?

Was 9/11 an inside job?

  1. Yes

    24 vote(s)
    28.9%
  2. No

    60 vote(s)
    72.3%
Multiple votes are allowed.
  1. Hannibal

    Hannibal New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2009
    Messages:
    10,624
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Um ... no.

    F=M*A The object's mass PLUS the acceleration, not minus.
    You must have flunked Grade school physics, eh?
     
  2. genericBob

    genericBob New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2014
    Messages:
    2,831
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    The ONLY way for that "F=M*A" formula to be used would be if the mass in question were to slow down or stop, while it is descending at constant acceleration its NOT doing ( and could not possibly be doing ) the work that you allege that it must.
     
  3. Hannibal

    Hannibal New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2009
    Messages:
    10,624
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Why not? Show your math.
     
  4. genericBob

    genericBob New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2014
    Messages:
    2,831
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Right after you produce the documentation that explosives were looked for and not found at ground zero.....

    The lurkers, the casual observer to this forum will be able to discern what is really going on and really the facts speak for themselves, this isn't rocket science its very basic applied physics with a bit of probability thrown in for good measure. The events of 9/11/2001 are NOT as described in the official "reports" on the subject.
     
  5. LoneStrSt8

    LoneStrSt8 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2011
    Messages:
    9,012
    Likes Received:
    32
    Trophy Points:
    0
    So you can't<and won't> show the math,then.
     
  6. genericBob

    genericBob New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2014
    Messages:
    2,831
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    This bit does NOT need "math" to prove the obvious,
    WTC1, 2 & 7 were destroyed by controlled demolition.
    the fact that some people still defend the official story
    speaks volumes!
     
  7. LoneStrSt8

    LoneStrSt8 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2011
    Messages:
    9,012
    Likes Received:
    32
    Trophy Points:
    0
    So,No math STILL.
     
  8. genericBob

    genericBob New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2014
    Messages:
    2,831
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    "math" isn't necessary to see that the destruction of WTC1, 2 & 7
    was most definitely controlled demolition.
     
  9. LoneStrSt8

    LoneStrSt8 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2011
    Messages:
    9,012
    Likes Received:
    32
    Trophy Points:
    0
    And STILL he refuses to show the math...
     
  10. Hannibal

    Hannibal New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2009
    Messages:
    10,624
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Argument from incredulity.
     
  11. genericBob

    genericBob New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2014
    Messages:
    2,831
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Is it more like common sense or "argument from incredulity"?
    I know "Hannibal" doesn't want to know, but I'll leave it to the lurkers to make up their own minds.

    have a nice day........

    : )
     
  12. Hannibal

    Hannibal New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2009
    Messages:
    10,624
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    0
    G
    Making wild claims without supporting evidence, and ignoring facts and science is arguing from incredulity. So far, it's all you've done.
     
  13. genericBob

    genericBob New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2014
    Messages:
    2,831
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    To address the INSIDE JOB definition,
    I would have to say NO, I'm not saying that 9/11 was an inside job,
    that is if by definition, INSIDE JOB, is and insistence upon the explanation that the GOVERNMENT DID IT, however, I can not say that the GOVERNMENT DID IT, and really I don't care if it really turns out to be the Symbionese Liberation Army! I KNOW that the official story is WRONG! there is something very, very WRONG with the whole official explanation.
     
  14. Hannibal

    Hannibal New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2009
    Messages:
    10,624
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Argument from incredulity.
     
  15. genericBob

    genericBob New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2014
    Messages:
    2,831
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    OH MY! and of course anything that invokes "INCREDULITY"
    must be completely bogus and not worth taking time to examine.
    right

    or is it not true
    that where there is smoke, there is fire ......

    Can U dig it?
     
  16. Hannibal

    Hannibal New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2009
    Messages:
    10,624
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Have you examined your own incredulity and found the facts? I've looked into your claims and found them severely lacking in scientific fact.
    Even when shown the math and physics behind it you continue to parrot the same falsehoods over and over.

    You are merely arguing. Incredulously. Without facts to support you.
     
  17. genericBob

    genericBob New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2014
    Messages:
    2,831
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Is it not a fact that 4 airliners were alleged to have crashed
    however not one wing, tail or vertical stabilizer was recovered.
    The jet engines that were alleged to have been from the fights, were never forensically ID'd to make certain of what we are dealing with here. and there is no accounting for the wreckage of any of the 4 airliners. WHY?

    is it not a fact also that 3 steel framed skyscrapers were completely destroyed on 9/11/2001 and in a manner very suggestive of controlled demolition, so much so, that the TV commentator who was on that morning, said that the buildings LOOKED like a building intentionally destroyed.

    + the total FRAUD published at taxpayer expense that boldly states
    "total collapse was inevitable ........ "
    Right, inevitable as soon as the collapse event stated.
    whats up with that?

    if you are not outraged, you are not paying attention.
     
  18. LoneStrSt8

    LoneStrSt8 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2011
    Messages:
    9,012
    Likes Received:
    32
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I see plenty of opinion....no evidence,still
     
  19. genericBob

    genericBob New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2014
    Messages:
    2,831
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    And I suppose that you consider it "opinion"
    that WTC7 "collapsed" in a manner that is identical to a Controlled Demolition?
     
  20. LoneStrSt8

    LoneStrSt8 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2011
    Messages:
    9,012
    Likes Received:
    32
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Yes.

    You can't claim it was identical,because you didn't see the entire collapse
     
  21. 9/11 was an inside job

    9/11 was an inside job Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 8, 2011
    Messages:
    6,492
    Likes Received:
    102
    Trophy Points:
    63
    of course it was an inside job.these facts in these two videos prove it. the 9/11 apologists have never been able to debunk these facts or ever has any answers for them.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GD_vwzjdTi4

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=68LUHa_-OlA

    nor do they ever have any answers for the facts in these two posts here on this thread by scott and maria either.

    http://www.politicalforum.com/showthread.php?t=348380&p=1063729867#post1063729867
     
  22. LoneStrSt8

    LoneStrSt8 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2011
    Messages:
    9,012
    Likes Received:
    32
    Trophy Points:
    0

    NO they DON'T,

    Just opinion,nothing more.
     
  23. Jango

    Jango New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2012
    Messages:
    2,683
    Likes Received:
    16
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Upper echelon upper management types, yes, but the minions were out and about doing what they do for a living: surveillance, spying, surreptitious entry, interdiction, etc etc. The hijackers were blown operatives of a known sleeper cell that had attended flight school in the U.S., that hijacking aircraft was their MO, that crashing or otherwise destroying the planes was their MO and whose passports into the U.S., by regulations, should have been denied, not to mention, that the knowledge of them using forged passports was also known.

    There's red flags all throughout the 9/11 narrative and not a whole lot of an information flow to address the various red flags.
     
  24. Natty Bumpo

    Natty Bumpo Banned

    Joined:
    Nov 28, 2012
    Messages:
    33,645
    Likes Received:
    9,532
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Any nefarious cabal would obviously be far more diligent - the sort that would plant WMD stockpiles in Iraq with nary a qualm rather than have their embarrassing, fraudulent pretexts exposed.

    Hidden agendas, gross callousness, and glaring incompetence amount to the sort of fare upon which conspiracy enthusiasts invariably feed.

    They inevitably give far too much credit to their imagined dastards. Dub was a genuinely hapless, smirking stumblebum, not the wily criminal mastermind some paranoids would make of him.

    [​IMG]
     
  25. LoneStrSt8

    LoneStrSt8 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2011
    Messages:
    9,012
    Likes Received:
    32
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Actually he was neither
     

Share This Page