No deal with it now. I barely looked at the parts about the attempted coup against Castro for several reasons. It did not interest me and I never thought overthrowing Castro's regime would be a bad thing. But I acknowledge the fact they did document those parts quite well They offered no evidence at all however that the CIA and mob killed Kennedy and that is fact. Also the parts I was most interested in.
Deal with your admitted ignorance? Thanks but no thanks By the was...do you remember what ZRifle was?
Which means you know they have no evidence concerning the Mob and CIA plot to kill Kennedy and it is all supposition.
That was non-responsive. Do you know what that term means? If you read the book you do. If you know anything about that book you know...
If you read the book you would know that they offer no evidence of any kind of a conspiracy against kennedy
No I did not I stated fact you cannot refute. Your tome has no evidence to support the claim of a conspiracy to kill Kennedy and you cannot refute that fact.
Have you figured out YET was ZRifle was about? I mean you're an expert on Ultimate Sacrifice...right?
Actually I said no such thing about being an expert. It has no evidence whatsoever of a plot to kill Kennedy as you well know and cannot refute
You admit you never read the book ...and yet make claims about what's in it? What do you think it is...the Warren Commission?
Not the entire book. Enough of it to know there is no evidence of a conspiracy to kill Kennedy contained in it
Wrong. Sicne I read enoughn to know better i am stating fact which you absolutely know you cannot challenge or refute
Because i read and fact checked enough to know it to be fact. You know it to be fact too which is why you can cite no such evidence
