Does Biden have the cognitive ability to be president?

Putting blame on his subordinates for all Biden's end-on-end fugg-ups is probably accurate ... and, it gives Geriatric Joe the added benefit of 'plausible deniability' when critics say he's too befuddled to know what's going on right in front of him....

Make book on this: it's a gaggle of backstage 'woke' creeps who're running Biden's shitshow, led (if that's the word that really applies) by Joe's Jamaican Voodoo Queen, masquerading as a Black woman....

It fools NOBODY but those who want to be fooled.

 

I doubt the DNC lets him choose any of them. They put him there for a reason.

 

That would be pretty sad if true. Do you think that is because he is old or just incompetent? Would they have been able to do the same thing to him 30 years ago?

 

Very likely, yes. Biden's been a lock-step, East Coast, go-along-to-get-along, liberal stooge since he first rolled in back in 1973....

 

So are you saying that Biden has never had the will or personality necessary to stand up to the DNC even in his prime?

 

Same old propaganda, new Democratic target.

 

'Never'...? I don't watch clowns like Biden closely enough over more than four DECADES to say, "never". But, my appraisal of him is, in my opinion, accurate overall.

Biden served a useful purpose during the Obama regime by being one of the few politicians around who could make a jive-ass nothingness like "the Messiah" look sensible by comparison....

 

I think he is both old and incompetent. I understand the old part since I'm only a year younger than he is. I do not think this would have worked 30 years ago. In fact I remember telling my wife in 2016 that I thought the democrats should have run Biden instead of Clinton. I think he would have beat Trump. Even though he beat Trump last year, he couldn't beat him today. He has shown his incompetence to the world.

 

I agree that 2016 should have been Biden's year. After a run of the Vice Presidency and before the decline was obvious, he likely would have won. However, his son had just died and it would be a difficult task to run under such a load of grief. Anyway, the circumstances worked out that he could run in 2020 without actively campaigning so it was better for him than a lot of constant run in's with reporters and making stupid comments on a daily basis that a real campaign would have required.

 

Joe's got a number of years on me, but I am a retired 'senior-citizen', and, I'm well aware of little events and anomalies that occur in my own life which remind me that, yeah, NOBODY my age should be shouldering the responsibility associated with being THE most important, powerful person in the world. Probable 'best' age for a president? Somewhere between about 45 and 55....

It's more -- much more -- than occasionally forgetting where you left your car keys, or forgetting to turn the water off on the backyard sprinkler. Believe me, there's a REASON why Germany, Great Britain, and France demand mandatory retirement for all their 'federal' judges at age SEVENTY. We should seriously consider a mandatory retirement age, too... especially for Supreme Court Justices...!

 

No argument there. I would say the best age for a president would be between 50 and 65 - enough life experience to benefit and enough youth to do the job.

 

Has there ever been a President who was completely independent? Who made his own decisions with no outside advice or direction?

 

I can’t recall a single president who in their own words said they would get in trouble for answering questions. If he gets in trouble there is obviously someone of higher power scolding him.

I've also never seen a president hire child actors in order to make his VP look good.

I’ve also never heard of a blunder on the foreign policy front like Biden created in Afghanistan.


no he’s not fit for president in my opinion