Don gets a pass...........for everything. One could argue it began here.

I've seen non-specific, fatuous word salad like that before. If you've got something to say why not say it?

 

Any reaction by The Following to President Flip Flop's flip flopping on tariffs on Mexico, an air strike against Iran, the citizenship question (what classic buffoonery that was), and the on again off again on again ICE raids on illegal immigrants (it's time to gin up the base)? Is that what "strong, decisive leadership" looks like in the error......sorry.......era of Trumpery? Or, as always, does he get a pass?

 

The correct and truthful response to the OP's nonsense would have resulted in a rules violation.

 

Newsflash. I spent lots of years in locker rooms and the types of people you speak of were known as A holes and were ignored by anyone except the weak stooges who WISHED they could do those things.

Trumpers are those fawning stooges

 

I'm guessing Don will get a pass on the farcical "social media summit" for which social media giants Facebook and Twitter were not invited. Why? Because the "summit" was really a collection of right wing trolls and hacks to whom the Tweeter-in-Chief gave a big attaboy for flogging his idiocy with abandon.
At one point he lied about a lie he told, claiming his lie about being wiretapped by Obama wasn't a lie at all.........when in fact it was. But then, The Following has no interest in whether Capt. Chaos tells the truth. It seems they actually prefer to be lied to. You know what they say about a little sugar helping the medicine go down.
Trump makes 6 false claims during his 'social media summit'
https://www.cnn.com/2019/07/11/poli...ial-media-summit-census-fact-check/index.html

Heck, what's 6 more when he's received a pass for thousands.

 

You have to realize that Trumpers see women as things, not humans...they have no respect for women so they can't see abuse as "wrong"...

 

It's on a taped video.

 

tRump and Epstein also had a private party in 2002 with a group of centerfolds and it's been reported tRump warned the person supplying the centerfolds about Epstein's history of "young women." It's also my understanding the person arranging the centerfold visit was surprised when only tRump and Epstein were at the party.

Together with the October 28, 2002 interview were tRump also made remarks about Epstein liking beautiful women on the younger side, it seems tRump knew things about Epstein's activities.

tRump is credited for being helpful in the Epstein investigation.

 

Trump's behavior has left Trumpette's with two choices. 1. Deny reality. 2. Accept reality but not care about it.
So.......either they say he never abused all those women, option #1, or they excuse it away with a variety of methods, option #2.

The place they can't get to is admitting their abject hypocrisy for holding Dems accountable for all manner of things while never, ever, finding fault with Trump for anything. Given his impulsive, inconsistent proclivities they have no idea what he will say or do today, tomorrow, or the next day. They just know they'll agree with it, whatever it is.

 

<Rule 2>

In case you didn't know...Trump sold the casino but the new owners retained the Trump name after agreeing to pay a royalty for it. Then when Carl Icahn took it over after the first bankruptcy, Trump sued to get his name removed but wasn't able to break the contract....so the name stayed. Then Carl Icahn took the casino into bankruptcy again.

 

Most troubling of all is how the Bigot-in-Chief gets a pass for the inhumane treatment of immigrants. Cuz he not only gets a pass.....Trumpette's like it.
Here Is Just Some of the Hateful Abuse Immigrants Face in Detention Centers
https://www.thenation.com/article/just-hateful-abuse-immigrants-face-detention-centers/

 

You're saying that someone cannot lie on taped video?

 

Think about how utterly horrible the Democrat Party has to be to lose to a candidate with these problems! The problem is that the Democratic Party is actually much worse now than two years ago. Their motto appears to be "lets burn your house down". I certainly have not heard a single Democratic candidate propose ANY policy that would do anything other than harm the white middle class. (One exception would be Tusli and her idea of getting out of the Middle East).

 

Typical Trumpers despite you claiming you don't like him:

""If what he says is bad, he's lying, if what he says sounds good, he's not lying"""....hilarious...

 

A couple of things. One, who is your source for the ridiculous claim about CNN? Second, what terminology would you use for Paul Manafort giving an operative of the Russian government internal polling data? Or for that matter an attempt to obtain dirt on Hillary from the Russian government that failed? One that was not prosecuted due to ignorance of the law according to Mueller's report.
We should all be skeptical about what the media reports since so much of it these days is delivered with a perspective. But thousands of stories about an economic collapse Trump would cause? I recall seeing pre-election articles about how the market would not like seeing someone so reckless and unpredictable get elected. Those articles reflected what was being said on Wall St. There is concern about a recession since all economic expansions come to an end. And there is justified concern Trump's policies will make it more difficult to deal with once it comes.
While we're at it, how about not blaming Trump's detractors for being skeptical about every single word he utters given his track record of inveterate lying?

 

You are blaming the Dems for the ignorance of Trump voters. It's time to accept responsibility for your mistake.

 

I am blaming the Democrat candidates for not proposing a single idea that would benefit the white middle class. If they have proposed such an idea, please tell me what is.

 

No, we're saying the logical conclusion one can draw when person A is accused of unwanted touching by 24 women, and then person A is seen on tape admitting he touches women in an inappropriate, unwanted way, it's reasonable to assume both the accusations and the admission are true.

 

In reviewing Hillary's positions I can't find one that would not help the white middle class. Though they are only one constituency.

 

Name one (I am only asking for one) policy proposed by any of the front running Democratic candidates that would benefit the white middle class OR..... be honest and admit that they are specifically targeted to HARM the white middle class. I double dog dare you.

 

BTW, just because what the Trumpers engaged in with respect to a conspiracy (as Mueller notes there is no law covering collusion) did not rise to the level of criminal activity does not mean it was not a serious breach of trust and a damning indictment of the president’s commitment to the health of our legal and political system.

 

I invite you to do as I did. Google "Clinton's policy positions in 2016 campaign." Then find one that, in your opinion, is targeted to harm the white middle class.

 

Actually, let me take that back. If you wanted to discuss this on another thread please start one. This thread is about how Trumpers give Don a pass on everything.