Hey look at that!! You've successfully changed the topic from your pathetic misuse of the word conspiracy and failure to support your arguments about KSM, to the topic of 9/11 commission report and a personal attack against me. Your diversion techniques are getting good! Shift, redirect, and refocus.. Whoever it was who said that.. Applies great here. A bit of sleight of hand and boom, candy's epic fail forgotten!
You brought it up dear. I'm just reminding you of two truths; the 9/11 Commission Report is bulletproof on the major points and just one of your many flip flops.
Hey candycorn- Why don't you give everyone a good laugh and give your analysis of this video? [ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8YaFGSPErKU"]9/11 Incontrovertible Proof the Government is Lying - YouTube[/ame]
His posts are a major fail everyday wherever he goes with his hysterical lies the 9/11 coverup commission is bullet proof.
The report is an irrelevant POS written for the masses, who will never read it, and for the most part, are oblivious to what is going on in this country.
Okay, quote a major inaccuracy in the report. Feel free. Remember, quoting involves actually using quotation marks surrounding actual passages in the text of the document. Good luck.
Ahh, the classic twoofer cop out. I wish I could say it was unexpected. He he he... Do fetch some quotations of major inaccuracies in the 9/11 Commission Report and cease in wasting our time....if you can.
Hey candycorn- I'm still waiting for you to reply to post #103. http://www.politicalforum.com/9-11/...ter-your-fragile-mindsets-11.html#post4721521
well he has proven that in spades too many times to remember.oh and dont forget the three towers were owned by silverstein and they were the only three to collapse and others much closer to the twin towers were damaged far more extensively than bld 7 yet they remained standing.the coincidence theorists can only fling crap in defeat.
yep thats their strategy,play dumb and act dumber and dont watch and comment on videos that have evidence in them since it doesnt go along with their version of events.they of course will never look at any of those links you listed or watch any of those videos since they only see what they want to see and act dumb.
what does irreparable harm to the country is believeing in the lies and propaganda of the government allowing the real terrorists in the Bush administration to get away with their crimes,THEY are the traitorous scums and enemy sympathizers you all blindly defend.
the OCTA'S-official conspiracy theory apologists have been exposed for the shills they are in that great link you posted.thanks for posting that.
thats what the OCTA'S always do when their lies get shot down and get owned,they have no answer,so they run off with their tail between their legs and post lies before doing so.yep.
whats hysterial is his constant copouts how he changes the subject in his debates when he is losing all the time.
Actually this individual never debates, just parrots the remarks of others until it's way out of context of the original thread
Nope. Thems the rules all right. You should have looked it up. Now I know how reliable are your posts.
It doesnt take a genius to see his posts are always filled with lies and disinformation and leaves out key facts and evidence.
Yes, I will take advice on grammar from someone who uses the word, "Thems". NOT! God is a proper noun in my book. For those who haven't accepted the gift of faith, I wouldn't know.
Hey candycorn- I'm still waiting for you to address post #103. Here's a link to it. http://www.politicalforum.com/9-11/...ter-your-fragile-mindsets-11.html#post4721521
good lort, I could come up with a better conspiracy than this... to have a good conspiracy, you have to look at what people will logically accept and what factors will play for and against you. now, suppose the gubmunt comes up with an idea to go over and attack some foreign country for it's oil...and cuz they dun dissed the Prez's daddy..and wanted to plan some big diversion to make the American people all hot and bothered. it would make SENSE to plan something easily controlled...you would narrow down your chances of something going wrong, or something leaking out. Now lets just look at ONE aspect of your conspiracy: the remote controlled planes. now if the government was going to go to the trouble and take the move to attack our own people; WHY would they land the planes somewhere and fly them empty into the WTC? Obviously loss of life is not an issue to them (in this scenario) so why not just eliminate that step? Why take the chance that there MIGHT be someone on the plane with a phone or that will rebel? OR that the military people faced with executing these couple of hundred people might refuse to do so or might talk about it later? (it's a whole lot harder to kill someone face to face than to push a button) PLUS: once you blow something up, you have lost control of a situation, there is no way they could have known with one hundred percent certainty that no part of the fuselage would be salvagable or would not break off and land in the streets, so having an empty plane would be a HUGE gamble. until you can answer this most basic questions you just don't have a conspiracy theory.